Quantifying concrete recarbonation potential: A life cycle approach to carbon uptake

IF 12.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108300
Yulin Patrisia , David W. Law , Jingxuan Zhang
{"title":"Quantifying concrete recarbonation potential: A life cycle approach to carbon uptake","authors":"Yulin Patrisia ,&nbsp;David W. Law ,&nbsp;Jingxuan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Concrete production is a major source of carbon emissions, but carbonation of concrete throughout its life is also a natural process that results in the sequestration of atmospheric CO₂ into the concrete. To understand the relationship between emission and sequestrations this study quantifies the carbonation potential of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) across its full lifecycle, encompassing both service life and end-of-life, including stockpiling, recycling, and secondary use. An Empirical CO₂ Uptake Model for Concrete developed by IVL is used to predict carbonation depths in natural and the recycled concrete utilized as aggregate. This model assesses the carbonation uptake relative to both the CO<sub>2</sub> generated from cement production and from concrete production in a standard bridge structure. The data shows limited carbonation occurs during the primary service life over 100 years, capturing only up to 2.99 % (5.85 kg CO<sub>2</sub>/m<sup>3</sup>) of calcination emission, while secondary applications add up to 2.66 % (5.19 kg CO<sub>2</sub>/m<sup>3</sup>). In contrast, the recycling and stockpiling phase achieves a higher rate of carbonation over a 12-month period, ranging from 31 to 65 % (61–128 kg CO₂/m<sup>3</sup>), depending on stockpile configuration and duration. Shallow, spread-out stockpiles maximize CO₂ absorption by increasing surface exposure and airflow. Dust particles fully carbonate within weeks (31 % of calcination emission), whereas larger particles carbonate progressively over time. Secondary use of RCA in new concrete further enhances its carbon sink potential due to its residual reactivity and increased porosity. Overall, concrete demonstrates substantial carbonation potential, with total CO₂ uptake ranging from 35 % to 68 % of calcination emission.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 108300"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525004974","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concrete production is a major source of carbon emissions, but carbonation of concrete throughout its life is also a natural process that results in the sequestration of atmospheric CO₂ into the concrete. To understand the relationship between emission and sequestrations this study quantifies the carbonation potential of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) across its full lifecycle, encompassing both service life and end-of-life, including stockpiling, recycling, and secondary use. An Empirical CO₂ Uptake Model for Concrete developed by IVL is used to predict carbonation depths in natural and the recycled concrete utilized as aggregate. This model assesses the carbonation uptake relative to both the CO2 generated from cement production and from concrete production in a standard bridge structure. The data shows limited carbonation occurs during the primary service life over 100 years, capturing only up to 2.99 % (5.85 kg CO2/m3) of calcination emission, while secondary applications add up to 2.66 % (5.19 kg CO2/m3). In contrast, the recycling and stockpiling phase achieves a higher rate of carbonation over a 12-month period, ranging from 31 to 65 % (61–128 kg CO₂/m3), depending on stockpile configuration and duration. Shallow, spread-out stockpiles maximize CO₂ absorption by increasing surface exposure and airflow. Dust particles fully carbonate within weeks (31 % of calcination emission), whereas larger particles carbonate progressively over time. Secondary use of RCA in new concrete further enhances its carbon sink potential due to its residual reactivity and increased porosity. Overall, concrete demonstrates substantial carbonation potential, with total CO₂ uptake ranging from 35 % to 68 % of calcination emission.
量化具体的再碳化潜力:碳吸收的生命周期方法
混凝土生产是碳排放的主要来源,但混凝土在其整个生命周期中的碳化也是一个自然过程,导致大气中的二氧化碳被隔离到混凝土中。为了了解排放和封存之间的关系,本研究量化了再生混凝土骨料(RCA)在其整个生命周期内的碳化潜力,包括使用寿命和报废寿命,包括储存、回收和二次利用。IVL开发的混凝土经验CO₂吸收模型用于预测用作骨料的天然和再生混凝土的碳化深度。该模型评估了在标准桥梁结构中,相对于水泥生产和混凝土生产产生的二氧化碳的碳化吸收。数据显示,在100年以上的主要使用寿命期间,碳化作用有限,仅捕获了高达2.99% (5.85 kg CO2/m3)的煅烧排放,而二次应用合计高达2.66% (5.19 kg CO2/m3)。相比之下,回收和储存阶段在12个月的时间内实现了更高的碳化率,范围从31%到65%(61-128千克二氧化碳/立方米),具体取决于储存配置和持续时间。浅层铺开的储层通过增加表面暴露和气流来最大限度地吸收二氧化碳。粉尘颗粒在几周内完全碳酸盐化(煅烧排放的31%),而较大的颗粒随着时间的推移逐渐碳酸盐化。二次使用RCA在新混凝土进一步提高其碳汇潜力,由于其残余的反应性和增加的孔隙率。总体而言,混凝土具有巨大的碳化潜力,其二氧化碳吸收总量占煅烧排放总量的35%至68%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书