Chronic caffeine consumption on clinical TMS outcomes: A naturalistic retrospective analysis.

Jamie Kweon, Prem Ganesh, Joshua C Brown
{"title":"Chronic caffeine consumption on clinical TMS outcomes: A naturalistic retrospective analysis.","authors":"Jamie Kweon, Prem Ganesh, Joshua C Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.transm.2025.100199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health and behavioral factors likely influence repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) effectiveness, though clear support is lacking. Since habitual caffeine use has been found to impair corticomotor plasticity, we hypothesized that clinical benefits may likewise be impaired. We performed a retrospective analysis (n = 179) from the McLean Hospital TMS Clinic to explore the effect of self-reported caffeine use on TMS clinical outcomes. Self-report depression and anxiety scales from caffeine users and non-users were compared with Wilcoxon-rank-sum test and response and remission rates with chi-square; Spearman's was used to correlate correlation caffeine quantity with degree of clinical change. Both groups experienced a significant reduction in depressive symptoms as expected. Contrary to our hypothesis, however, we found no differences between caffeine users and non-users in total symptom reduction or response and remission rates, nor did we find a relationship between caffeine quantity and clinical change. This naturalistic analysis suggests that chronic caffeine consumption does not influence treatment outcomes in clinical rTMS for depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":520872,"journal":{"name":"Transcranial magnetic stimulation (2024)","volume":"5 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12674203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transcranial magnetic stimulation (2024)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transm.2025.100199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health and behavioral factors likely influence repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) effectiveness, though clear support is lacking. Since habitual caffeine use has been found to impair corticomotor plasticity, we hypothesized that clinical benefits may likewise be impaired. We performed a retrospective analysis (n = 179) from the McLean Hospital TMS Clinic to explore the effect of self-reported caffeine use on TMS clinical outcomes. Self-report depression and anxiety scales from caffeine users and non-users were compared with Wilcoxon-rank-sum test and response and remission rates with chi-square; Spearman's was used to correlate correlation caffeine quantity with degree of clinical change. Both groups experienced a significant reduction in depressive symptoms as expected. Contrary to our hypothesis, however, we found no differences between caffeine users and non-users in total symptom reduction or response and remission rates, nor did we find a relationship between caffeine quantity and clinical change. This naturalistic analysis suggests that chronic caffeine consumption does not influence treatment outcomes in clinical rTMS for depression.

Abstract Image

慢性咖啡因摄入对临床经颅磁刺激结果的影响:一项自然的回顾性分析。
健康和行为因素可能影响重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的有效性,尽管缺乏明确的支持。由于已经发现习惯性使用咖啡因会损害皮质运动的可塑性,我们假设临床益处也可能受到损害。我们从麦克莱恩医院经颅磁刺激诊所进行了回顾性分析(n = 179),以探讨自我报告的咖啡因使用对经颅磁刺激临床结果的影响。用wilcoxon秩和检验比较咖啡因使用者和非咖啡因使用者的自我报告抑郁和焦虑量表,用卡方法比较反应率和缓解率;斯皮尔曼氏法用于将咖啡因量与临床变化程度相关联。正如预期的那样,两组患者的抑郁症状都显著减轻。然而,与我们的假设相反,我们发现咖啡因使用者和非使用者在总体症状减轻或反应和缓解率方面没有差异,我们也没有发现咖啡因量与临床变化之间的关系。这一自然分析表明,长期摄入咖啡因并不影响临床rTMS治疗抑郁症的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书