The impact of ethnicity information in single best answer questions on student performance, item response time and psychometric properties

IF 3.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jenanan Mohan, Michaela Pishia, Duaa Alim, Patrick J. McGown, Anjali Amin, Richard J. Pinder, Omid Halse, Celia Brown, Amir H. Sam
{"title":"The impact of ethnicity information in single best answer questions on student performance, item response time and psychometric properties","authors":"Jenanan Mohan,&nbsp;Michaela Pishia,&nbsp;Duaa Alim,&nbsp;Patrick J. McGown,&nbsp;Anjali Amin,&nbsp;Richard J. Pinder,&nbsp;Omid Halse,&nbsp;Celia Brown,&nbsp;Amir H. Sam","doi":"10.1007/s10459-025-10489-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Inclusion of patient age and sex in single best answer (SBA) questions is standard practice, whereas ethnicity is typically included only when considered clinically relevant. This selective use may inadvertently cue students or introduce bias. This study examined whether including patient ethnicity in SBA questions influences student performance, response time and item psychometric properties. A prospective randomised controlled study was conducted using two versions of a final-year formative assessment. In each version, approximately half of the questions included the patient’s ethnicity, while the corresponding questions in the alternate version omitted this information. Students were randomly assigned to one of the two exam versions. Two hundred and sixty-seven final-year medical students participated in the study. The mean score for questions without ethnicity was 80.3% and for questions with ethnicity was 79.8% (mean difference = −0.5 pp, <i>p</i> = 0.12). On average, students spent 1.6 seconds longer to answer questions with ethnicity compared to questions without ethnicity (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). In SBA questions with and without ethnicity, there was no significant difference in mean facility (79.8% vs. 80.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.17) or mean item–total score point-biserial correlation (0.20 vs. 0.21, <i>p</i> = 0.63). These indicate that including patient ethnicity did not significantly impact overall student performance or mean item-level psychometric properties. However, it was associated with longer response times, suggesting a small but significant increase in cognitive load. Educators involved in assessment design should carefully consider this added cognitive burden when deciding whether to include patient ethnicity in future assessments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":"31 4","pages":"1113 - 1126"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10459-025-10489-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10459-025-10489-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inclusion of patient age and sex in single best answer (SBA) questions is standard practice, whereas ethnicity is typically included only when considered clinically relevant. This selective use may inadvertently cue students or introduce bias. This study examined whether including patient ethnicity in SBA questions influences student performance, response time and item psychometric properties. A prospective randomised controlled study was conducted using two versions of a final-year formative assessment. In each version, approximately half of the questions included the patient’s ethnicity, while the corresponding questions in the alternate version omitted this information. Students were randomly assigned to one of the two exam versions. Two hundred and sixty-seven final-year medical students participated in the study. The mean score for questions without ethnicity was 80.3% and for questions with ethnicity was 79.8% (mean difference = −0.5 pp, p = 0.12). On average, students spent 1.6 seconds longer to answer questions with ethnicity compared to questions without ethnicity (p < 0.01). In SBA questions with and without ethnicity, there was no significant difference in mean facility (79.8% vs. 80.3%, p = 0.17) or mean item–total score point-biserial correlation (0.20 vs. 0.21, p = 0.63). These indicate that including patient ethnicity did not significantly impact overall student performance or mean item-level psychometric properties. However, it was associated with longer response times, suggesting a small but significant increase in cognitive load. Educators involved in assessment design should carefully consider this added cognitive burden when deciding whether to include patient ethnicity in future assessments.

单一最佳答案问题中种族信息对学生表现、项目反应时间和心理测量属性的影响。
在单一最佳答案(SBA)问题中纳入患者年龄和性别是标准做法,而种族通常仅在被认为与临床相关时才纳入。这种选择性使用可能会无意中暗示学生或引入偏见。本研究考察了在SBA问题中加入患者种族是否会影响学生的表现、反应时间和项目心理测量特性。一项前瞻性随机对照研究使用两个版本的最后一年形成性评估进行。在每个版本中,大约一半的问题包括患者的种族,而在备用版本中相应的问题省略了这一信息。学生们被随机分配到两个考试版本中的一个。267名医学院毕业生参与了这项研究。无种族问题的平均得分为80.3%,有种族问题的平均得分为79.8%(平均差异= -0.5 pp, p = 0.12)。平均而言,学生回答带有种族的问题比回答没有种族的问题要多花1.6秒
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书