Semantic Typicality of Affixes Facilitates Word Processing: MEG Evidence From Arabic.

IF 3.7 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Neurobiology of Language Pub Date : 2025-12-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1162/NOL.a.24
Marianne Azar, Alec Marantz
{"title":"Semantic Typicality of Affixes Facilitates Word Processing: MEG Evidence From Arabic.","authors":"Marianne Azar, Alec Marantz","doi":"10.1162/NOL.a.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Upon reading a word, we decompose it into meaningful parts-morphemes. Even if novel, we can derive a likely meaning for it based on how its parts typically behave. Given the typical meaning of affix \"-ery,\" we may guess that a bottlery is a place to make bottles, although we may alternatively guess that it is the craft of bottle making. In this study, we operationalize this feature-an affix's semantic typicality-to investigate affix semantics' role in word processing. Using a lexical decision task and a double dissociative design in an MEG setting, we took advantage of Arabic's highly productive word-pattern derivational system to investigate the role of meaning typicality for derivational morphology. We contrasted one affix typically denoting tools and atypically places with another affix having the reverse denotation pattern. We found higher activity for typical-meaning words in the temporal pole, inferior temporal gyrus, and middle temporal gyrus at an earlier time window than previously associated with semantic processing. Additionally, we replicated results on noun/verb ambiguity, where ambiguous words had higher activity in the fusiform gyrus and throughout the temporal lobe. Our results on lexicality-contrasting words versus nonwords-were also consistent with previous literature. A finer-grained distinction between pseudowords with real roots versus pseudoroots further allowed us to explore the role of affixes in processing in the temporal pole and the inferior frontal cortex. Overall, our study contributes importantly to findings on affix semantic processing and contributes generally to growing findings on different stages of morphological decomposition.</p>","PeriodicalId":34845,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Language","volume":"6 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12674548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/NOL.a.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Upon reading a word, we decompose it into meaningful parts-morphemes. Even if novel, we can derive a likely meaning for it based on how its parts typically behave. Given the typical meaning of affix "-ery," we may guess that a bottlery is a place to make bottles, although we may alternatively guess that it is the craft of bottle making. In this study, we operationalize this feature-an affix's semantic typicality-to investigate affix semantics' role in word processing. Using a lexical decision task and a double dissociative design in an MEG setting, we took advantage of Arabic's highly productive word-pattern derivational system to investigate the role of meaning typicality for derivational morphology. We contrasted one affix typically denoting tools and atypically places with another affix having the reverse denotation pattern. We found higher activity for typical-meaning words in the temporal pole, inferior temporal gyrus, and middle temporal gyrus at an earlier time window than previously associated with semantic processing. Additionally, we replicated results on noun/verb ambiguity, where ambiguous words had higher activity in the fusiform gyrus and throughout the temporal lobe. Our results on lexicality-contrasting words versus nonwords-were also consistent with previous literature. A finer-grained distinction between pseudowords with real roots versus pseudoroots further allowed us to explore the role of affixes in processing in the temporal pole and the inferior frontal cortex. Overall, our study contributes importantly to findings on affix semantic processing and contributes generally to growing findings on different stages of morphological decomposition.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

词缀的语义典型性促进了文字处理:来自阿拉伯语的MEG证据。
在阅读一个单词时,我们把它分解成有意义的部分——语素。即使它是新颖的,我们也可以根据它的各个部分的典型行为得出一个可能的含义。考虑到词缀“-ery”的典型含义,我们可能会猜测,bottery是制造瓶子的地方,尽管我们也可能猜测它是制造瓶子的工艺。在本研究中,我们运用词缀的语义典型性这一特征来研究词缀语义在文字处理中的作用。利用词汇决策任务和MEG设置中的双重解离设计,我们利用阿拉伯语高效的词模式衍生系统来研究意义典型性对衍生形态的作用。我们将一个通常表示工具和非典型地点的词缀与另一个具有相反表示模式的词缀进行了对比。我们发现,在更早的时间窗口中,颞极、下颞回和中颞回对典型意义单词的活动比之前与语义处理相关的活动要高。此外,我们重复了名词/动词歧义的结果,歧义词在梭状回和整个颞叶有更高的活动。我们在词汇量上的结果——对比单词和非单词——也与之前的文献一致。假词的真词根和假根之间的细微差别进一步使我们能够探索词缀在颞极和额叶下皮层加工过程中的作用。总的来说,我们的研究对词缀语义加工的发现做出了重要贡献,并对不同阶段形态分解的发现做出了广泛的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Language
Neurobiology of Language Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书