Response Evaluation Criteria in Grade 1/2 Neuroendocrine Tumors (RECIN)

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Seminars in nuclear medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-03 DOI:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2025.11.009
Piyush Aggarwal , Swayamjeet Satapathy , Kunal R. Chandekar , Ashwani Sood
{"title":"Response Evaluation Criteria in Grade 1/2 Neuroendocrine Tumors (RECIN)","authors":"Piyush Aggarwal ,&nbsp;Swayamjeet Satapathy ,&nbsp;Kunal R. Chandekar ,&nbsp;Ashwani Sood","doi":"10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2025.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate response assessment in well-differentiated grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) remains a major clinical challenge. Conventional size-based radiographic criteria such as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 often fail to capture the slow, indolent nature of NETs. In these tumors, meaningful survival benefits, particularly after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTATATE, occur without significant tumor shrinkage, while treatment-related necrotic or inflammatory changes can mimic progression. Several modified anatomical criteria, including Choi and mRECIST, have attempted to address these limitations, but results have been inconsistent and largely retrospective. Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-PET/CT with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-labeled analogues offers the opportunity to quantify biological response at the molecular level, reflecting alterations in receptor density and viable tumor burden. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Neuroendocrine Tumors (RECIN), developed from a post-hoc analysis of the phase II LuCAP trial, integrates semi-quantitative SSTR-PET parameters with conventional CT metrics. Using the summed SULpeak of up to five of the hottest lesions (up to two per organ), RECIN defines molecular partial response as a ≥25% reduction in summed SULpeak, while maintaining RECIST safeguards for progression. Applied to the prospective LuCAP trial dataset, RECIN identified additional responders, detected response earlier, and predicted progression-free survival more accurately than RECIST. By harmonizing biological and morphological information, RECIN provides a practical and reproducible framework tailored to the indolent, receptor-driven biology of NETs. Prospective multicenter validation, and correlation with longer term outcomes are needed to establish RECIN as standardized response criteria for PRRT as well as other treatment modalities for well-differentiated NETs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21643,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in nuclear medicine","volume":"56 1","pages":"Pages 22-30"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001299825001618","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate response assessment in well-differentiated grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) remains a major clinical challenge. Conventional size-based radiographic criteria such as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 often fail to capture the slow, indolent nature of NETs. In these tumors, meaningful survival benefits, particularly after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE, occur without significant tumor shrinkage, while treatment-related necrotic or inflammatory changes can mimic progression. Several modified anatomical criteria, including Choi and mRECIST, have attempted to address these limitations, but results have been inconsistent and largely retrospective. Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-PET/CT with [68Ga]Ga-labeled analogues offers the opportunity to quantify biological response at the molecular level, reflecting alterations in receptor density and viable tumor burden. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Neuroendocrine Tumors (RECIN), developed from a post-hoc analysis of the phase II LuCAP trial, integrates semi-quantitative SSTR-PET parameters with conventional CT metrics. Using the summed SULpeak of up to five of the hottest lesions (up to two per organ), RECIN defines molecular partial response as a ≥25% reduction in summed SULpeak, while maintaining RECIST safeguards for progression. Applied to the prospective LuCAP trial dataset, RECIN identified additional responders, detected response earlier, and predicted progression-free survival more accurately than RECIST. By harmonizing biological and morphological information, RECIN provides a practical and reproducible framework tailored to the indolent, receptor-driven biology of NETs. Prospective multicenter validation, and correlation with longer term outcomes are needed to establish RECIN as standardized response criteria for PRRT as well as other treatment modalities for well-differentiated NETs.
1/2级神经内分泌肿瘤疗效评价标准(RECIN)。
准确评估高分化1/2级神经内分泌肿瘤(NETs)的疗效仍然是一个主要的临床挑战。传统的基于大小的放射学标准,如实体瘤反应评价标准(RECIST) 1.1,往往无法捕捉到NETs缓慢、惰性的本质。在这些肿瘤中,特别是在使用[177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE进行肽受体放射性核素治疗(PRRT)后,没有明显的肿瘤缩小,而治疗相关的坏死或炎症变化可以模拟进展。包括Choi和mRECIST在内的一些修改的解剖学标准试图解决这些局限性,但结果不一致,而且主要是回顾性的。生长抑素受体(SSTR)-PET/CT与[68Ga] ga标记的类似物提供了在分子水平上量化生物反应的机会,反映了受体密度和活肿瘤负荷的变化。神经内分泌肿瘤反应评价标准(RECIN)是基于II期LuCAP试验的事后分析而制定的,将半定量的SSTR-PET参数与常规CT指标相结合。RECIN使用最多5个最热病变的总SULpeak(每个器官最多2个),将分子部分缓解定义为总SULpeak减少≥25%,同时维持RECIST对进展的保障。应用于前瞻性的LuCAP试验数据集,RECIN识别了额外的应答者,更早地检测到应答,并比RECIST更准确地预测无进展生存期。通过协调生物学和形态学信息,RECIN提供了一个实用的、可重复的框架,适合于惰性的、受体驱动的net生物学。需要前瞻性多中心验证,以及与长期结果的相关性,以建立RECIN作为PRRT和其他高分化NETs治疗方式的标准化反应标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in nuclear medicine
Seminars in nuclear medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
14 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Nuclear Medicine is the leading review journal in nuclear medicine. Each issue brings you expert reviews and commentary on a single topic as selected by the Editors. The journal contains extensive coverage of the field of nuclear medicine, including PET, SPECT, and other molecular imaging studies, and related imaging studies. Full-color illustrations are used throughout to highlight important findings. Seminars is included in PubMed/Medline, Thomson/ISI, and other major scientific indexes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书