Use of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for wounds and musculoskeletal treatment: a systematic review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Tanner J Howard, Leah Amir, Matthew J Regulski, John D Mullins
{"title":"Use of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for wounds and musculoskeletal treatment: a systematic review.","authors":"Tanner J Howard, Leah Amir, Matthew J Regulski, John D Mullins","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2024.0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review was to assess the healing performance of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on integumentary wounds and musculoskeletal tissue injury.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using PubMed and Google Scholar, a systematic search was conducted in June 2021 on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed treatment efficacy of ESWT on wounds or musculoskeletal tissue injuries. Reviewed studies were stratified by target tissue and energy density level, and assessed for risk of bias. Outcome measures reported in more than one reviewed study on the same target tissue were pooled and graded for quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 296 records were considered and 14 eligible studies reviewed. Experimental design varied across studies, with ESWT applied at energy densities ranging from 0.08-0.58mJ/mm<sup>2</sup>. The performance of ESWT matched or exceeded that of placebo-controlled treatments and/or standard of care in all reviewed studies. In addition, 12 studies-including all studies on wounds-reported significantly faster tissue healing and/or greater pain reduction with ESWT compared with the comparator treatment(s). Evidence from pooled analyses favoured ESWT and ranged from very low to moderate in quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this systematic review suggested that ESWT supported wound healing and is a promising treatment method for musculoskeletal tissue injuries. An implementation of standardised, tissue-specific ESWT protocols will benefit future evidence-based investigations that compare findings between studies on the same targeted tissue. Additional results from well-designed, appropriately powered RCTs will aid decision-making and further inform the clinical evidence of the tissue healing benefits provided by ESWT.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 Sup12a","pages":"S5-S16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the healing performance of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on integumentary wounds and musculoskeletal tissue injury.

Method: Using PubMed and Google Scholar, a systematic search was conducted in June 2021 on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed treatment efficacy of ESWT on wounds or musculoskeletal tissue injuries. Reviewed studies were stratified by target tissue and energy density level, and assessed for risk of bias. Outcome measures reported in more than one reviewed study on the same target tissue were pooled and graded for quality of evidence.

Results: A total of 296 records were considered and 14 eligible studies reviewed. Experimental design varied across studies, with ESWT applied at energy densities ranging from 0.08-0.58mJ/mm2. The performance of ESWT matched or exceeded that of placebo-controlled treatments and/or standard of care in all reviewed studies. In addition, 12 studies-including all studies on wounds-reported significantly faster tissue healing and/or greater pain reduction with ESWT compared with the comparator treatment(s). Evidence from pooled analyses favoured ESWT and ranged from very low to moderate in quality.

Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review suggested that ESWT supported wound healing and is a promising treatment method for musculoskeletal tissue injuries. An implementation of standardised, tissue-specific ESWT protocols will benefit future evidence-based investigations that compare findings between studies on the same targeted tissue. Additional results from well-designed, appropriately powered RCTs will aid decision-making and further inform the clinical evidence of the tissue healing benefits provided by ESWT.

使用体外冲击波治疗伤口和肌肉骨骼治疗:系统回顾。
目的:本系统综述的目的是评估体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)对皮肤损伤和肌肉骨骼组织损伤的愈合效果。方法:使用PubMed和b谷歌Scholar,于2021年6月对评估ESWT对伤口或肌肉骨骼组织损伤治疗效果的随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统检索。回顾的研究按靶组织和能量密度水平分层,并评估偏倚风险。对同一目标组织的多个回顾性研究报告的结果测量进行汇总并根据证据质量进行分级。结果:共纳入296项记录,并审查了14项符合条件的研究。不同研究的实验设计各不相同,ESWT应用的能量密度范围为0.08-0.58mJ/mm2。在所有回顾的研究中,ESWT的表现与安慰剂对照治疗和/或标准护理相匹配或超过。此外,12项研究(包括所有关于伤口的研究)报告,与对照治疗相比,ESWT的组织愈合和/或疼痛减轻明显更快。来自综合分析的证据支持ESWT,其质量范围从非常低到中等。结论:本系统综述的研究结果表明,ESWT支持伤口愈合,是一种很有前途的治疗肌肉骨骼组织损伤的方法。标准化的组织特异性ESWT协议的实施将有利于未来基于证据的研究,比较同一目标组织的研究结果。设计良好、动力适当的随机对照试验的其他结果将有助于决策,并进一步为ESWT提供的组织愈合益处提供临床证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书