Tomer Lagziel, Arya A Akhavan, Feras Shamoun, Sophie Cemaj, Joshua Yoon, Sohayla Rostami, Qingwen Kawaji, Stephanie L Martinez, Eliana F R Duraes, Julie A Caffrey, C Scott Hultman
{"title":"Optimal excision time for burn injuries of over 20% total body surface area: a retrospective review.","authors":"Tomer Lagziel, Arya A Akhavan, Feras Shamoun, Sophie Cemaj, Joshua Yoon, Sohayla Rostami, Qingwen Kawaji, Stephanie L Martinez, Eliana F R Duraes, Julie A Caffrey, C Scott Hultman","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2024.0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While early excision of burn wounds is known to improve outcomes, the precise optimal timing within the early period remains unclear. A previous study by the authors suggests possible superiority in outcomes associated with immediate/expedited excision. This study aims to assess whether there is a difference in outcomes if initial excision is performed immediately (<24 hours), expedited (24-72 hours), or early (3-6 days) in adults with burns-related injuries of >20% total body surface area (TBSA).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The authors performed a retrospective review of adults admitted to the Johns Hopkins Burn Center (Baltimore, US). The authors stratified the study groups based on pre-established definitions of time-to-excision: immediate (<24 hours); expedited (24-72 hours); and early (3-6 days). They assessed: blood-loss during the initial surgery; transfusion requirements; pain levels; daily analgesic requirements; complications; readmissions; length of stay (LoS) and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The records of 1035 adult patients were reviewed, of which 99 patients with >20% TBSA required excision. Data showed 10 patients were in the immediate group, 63 in the expedited group, and 26 in the early group. Patients in the expedited group had significantly (p<0.05) greater blood loss, transfusion requirements, pain scores, analgesic requirements, readmissions, LoS and mortality than patients in the immediate and early groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this review suggest a bimodal optimal time-to-excision of 'immediately' or 'early'. The expedited group appeared to have worse outcomes. The immediate group had favourable outcomes, possibly due to the removal of the inflammatory nidus before systemic dysfunction took place, while the early group had favourable outcomes possibly due to the resolution and stabilisation of the patients' haemodynamic and inflammatory status. Based on the authors' data, immediate (<24 hours) and early (3-6 days) excision of burns are superior to expedited excision (24-72 hours). These results strongly argue in favour of a randomised, controlled trial to help define the optimal timing of burn wound excision.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 Sup12a","pages":"S25-S30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: While early excision of burn wounds is known to improve outcomes, the precise optimal timing within the early period remains unclear. A previous study by the authors suggests possible superiority in outcomes associated with immediate/expedited excision. This study aims to assess whether there is a difference in outcomes if initial excision is performed immediately (<24 hours), expedited (24-72 hours), or early (3-6 days) in adults with burns-related injuries of >20% total body surface area (TBSA).
Method: The authors performed a retrospective review of adults admitted to the Johns Hopkins Burn Center (Baltimore, US). The authors stratified the study groups based on pre-established definitions of time-to-excision: immediate (<24 hours); expedited (24-72 hours); and early (3-6 days). They assessed: blood-loss during the initial surgery; transfusion requirements; pain levels; daily analgesic requirements; complications; readmissions; length of stay (LoS) and mortality.
Results: The records of 1035 adult patients were reviewed, of which 99 patients with >20% TBSA required excision. Data showed 10 patients were in the immediate group, 63 in the expedited group, and 26 in the early group. Patients in the expedited group had significantly (p<0.05) greater blood loss, transfusion requirements, pain scores, analgesic requirements, readmissions, LoS and mortality than patients in the immediate and early groups.
Conclusion: The findings of this review suggest a bimodal optimal time-to-excision of 'immediately' or 'early'. The expedited group appeared to have worse outcomes. The immediate group had favourable outcomes, possibly due to the removal of the inflammatory nidus before systemic dysfunction took place, while the early group had favourable outcomes possibly due to the resolution and stabilisation of the patients' haemodynamic and inflammatory status. Based on the authors' data, immediate (<24 hours) and early (3-6 days) excision of burns are superior to expedited excision (24-72 hours). These results strongly argue in favour of a randomised, controlled trial to help define the optimal timing of burn wound excision.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice.
In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers.
Specifically, JWC publishes:
High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more
The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide
In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments
Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds
Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness
Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.