Optimal excision time for burn injuries of over 20% total body surface area: a retrospective review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Tomer Lagziel, Arya A Akhavan, Feras Shamoun, Sophie Cemaj, Joshua Yoon, Sohayla Rostami, Qingwen Kawaji, Stephanie L Martinez, Eliana F R Duraes, Julie A Caffrey, C Scott Hultman
{"title":"Optimal excision time for burn injuries of over 20% total body surface area: a retrospective review.","authors":"Tomer Lagziel, Arya A Akhavan, Feras Shamoun, Sophie Cemaj, Joshua Yoon, Sohayla Rostami, Qingwen Kawaji, Stephanie L Martinez, Eliana F R Duraes, Julie A Caffrey, C Scott Hultman","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2024.0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While early excision of burn wounds is known to improve outcomes, the precise optimal timing within the early period remains unclear. A previous study by the authors suggests possible superiority in outcomes associated with immediate/expedited excision. This study aims to assess whether there is a difference in outcomes if initial excision is performed immediately (<24 hours), expedited (24-72 hours), or early (3-6 days) in adults with burns-related injuries of >20% total body surface area (TBSA).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The authors performed a retrospective review of adults admitted to the Johns Hopkins Burn Center (Baltimore, US). The authors stratified the study groups based on pre-established definitions of time-to-excision: immediate (<24 hours); expedited (24-72 hours); and early (3-6 days). They assessed: blood-loss during the initial surgery; transfusion requirements; pain levels; daily analgesic requirements; complications; readmissions; length of stay (LoS) and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The records of 1035 adult patients were reviewed, of which 99 patients with >20% TBSA required excision. Data showed 10 patients were in the immediate group, 63 in the expedited group, and 26 in the early group. Patients in the expedited group had significantly (p<0.05) greater blood loss, transfusion requirements, pain scores, analgesic requirements, readmissions, LoS and mortality than patients in the immediate and early groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this review suggest a bimodal optimal time-to-excision of 'immediately' or 'early'. The expedited group appeared to have worse outcomes. The immediate group had favourable outcomes, possibly due to the removal of the inflammatory nidus before systemic dysfunction took place, while the early group had favourable outcomes possibly due to the resolution and stabilisation of the patients' haemodynamic and inflammatory status. Based on the authors' data, immediate (<24 hours) and early (3-6 days) excision of burns are superior to expedited excision (24-72 hours). These results strongly argue in favour of a randomised, controlled trial to help define the optimal timing of burn wound excision.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 Sup12a","pages":"S25-S30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: While early excision of burn wounds is known to improve outcomes, the precise optimal timing within the early period remains unclear. A previous study by the authors suggests possible superiority in outcomes associated with immediate/expedited excision. This study aims to assess whether there is a difference in outcomes if initial excision is performed immediately (<24 hours), expedited (24-72 hours), or early (3-6 days) in adults with burns-related injuries of >20% total body surface area (TBSA).

Method: The authors performed a retrospective review of adults admitted to the Johns Hopkins Burn Center (Baltimore, US). The authors stratified the study groups based on pre-established definitions of time-to-excision: immediate (<24 hours); expedited (24-72 hours); and early (3-6 days). They assessed: blood-loss during the initial surgery; transfusion requirements; pain levels; daily analgesic requirements; complications; readmissions; length of stay (LoS) and mortality.

Results: The records of 1035 adult patients were reviewed, of which 99 patients with >20% TBSA required excision. Data showed 10 patients were in the immediate group, 63 in the expedited group, and 26 in the early group. Patients in the expedited group had significantly (p<0.05) greater blood loss, transfusion requirements, pain scores, analgesic requirements, readmissions, LoS and mortality than patients in the immediate and early groups.

Conclusion: The findings of this review suggest a bimodal optimal time-to-excision of 'immediately' or 'early'. The expedited group appeared to have worse outcomes. The immediate group had favourable outcomes, possibly due to the removal of the inflammatory nidus before systemic dysfunction took place, while the early group had favourable outcomes possibly due to the resolution and stabilisation of the patients' haemodynamic and inflammatory status. Based on the authors' data, immediate (<24 hours) and early (3-6 days) excision of burns are superior to expedited excision (24-72 hours). These results strongly argue in favour of a randomised, controlled trial to help define the optimal timing of burn wound excision.

烧伤面积超过体表面积20%的最佳切除时间:回顾性回顾。
目的:虽然已知早期烧伤创面切除可改善预后,但早期精确的最佳时机仍不清楚。作者先前的一项研究表明,立即/快速切除可能在预后方面具有优势。本研究旨在评估立即进行初始切除(20%体表面积(TBSA))是否会产生不同的结果。方法:作者对美国巴尔的摩约翰霍普金斯烧伤中心收治的成人进行回顾性分析。作者根据预先建立的切除时间定义对研究组进行了分层:立即(结果:回顾了1035例成年患者的记录,其中99例>20% TBSA患者需要切除。数据显示,即刻治疗组10例,加速治疗组63例,早期治疗组26例。结论:本综述的结果表明,“立即”或“早期”的双峰最佳切除时间。加急组的结果似乎更糟。即时组有良好的结果,可能是由于在全身性功能障碍发生之前清除了炎症病灶,而早期组有良好的结果,可能是由于患者血流动力学和炎症状态的解决和稳定。根据作者的数据,即时(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书