Establishing non-inferiority margins in myopia management contact lens trials with an active control.

IF 2.7 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ravi Chandra Bakaraju, Daniel Tilia
{"title":"Establishing non-inferiority margins in myopia management contact lens trials with an active control.","authors":"Ravi Chandra Bakaraju, Daniel Tilia","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The myopia control field stands at an ethical crossroads. Withholding proven soft contact lens interventions in control arms of myopia management trials is increasingly viewed as ethically questionable and operationally challenging, particularly given that MiSight 1-day contact lens has demonstrated efficacy in at least four randomised controlled trials. The recent methodological evolution towards non-inferiority trials against an established control rather than a placebo (single vision) is a welcome change. However, this shift raises a critical challenge: setting non-inferiority margins that are both clinically meaningful and statistically robust.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12682156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The myopia control field stands at an ethical crossroads. Withholding proven soft contact lens interventions in control arms of myopia management trials is increasingly viewed as ethically questionable and operationally challenging, particularly given that MiSight 1-day contact lens has demonstrated efficacy in at least four randomised controlled trials. The recent methodological evolution towards non-inferiority trials against an established control rather than a placebo (single vision) is a welcome change. However, this shift raises a critical challenge: setting non-inferiority margins that are both clinically meaningful and statistically robust.

在主动对照的近视治疗隐形眼镜试验中建立非劣效边际。
近视防治领域正站在伦理的十字路口。在近视管理试验的对照组中保留已证实的软性隐形眼镜干预越来越被认为是道德上的问题和操作上的挑战,特别是考虑到MiSight 1天隐形眼镜已在至少四项随机对照试验中证明有效。最近的方法学发展趋向于针对既定对照的非劣效性试验,而不是安慰剂(单一视觉),这是一个可喜的变化。然而,这种转变提出了一个关键的挑战:设定非劣效性边缘,既具有临床意义,又具有统计稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书