Implementation of trauma unit guidance for inpatient management of adult traumatic brain injury: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
British Journal of Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-05 DOI:10.1080/02688697.2025.2594517
Prabhjot Singh Malhotra, Siddarth Kannan, Matthew Kingham, Conor Gillespie, Matt Targett, Naomi D Deakin, Robina Robbie Singh, Vikesh Patel, Ivan Timofeev, Fahim Anwar, Andrea Lavinio, Peter Hutchinson, Adel Helmy
{"title":"Implementation of trauma unit guidance for inpatient management of adult traumatic brain injury: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Prabhjot Singh Malhotra, Siddarth Kannan, Matthew Kingham, Conor Gillespie, Matt Targett, Naomi D Deakin, Robina Robbie Singh, Vikesh Patel, Ivan Timofeev, Fahim Anwar, Andrea Lavinio, Peter Hutchinson, Adel Helmy","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2025.2594517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in adults, with a substantial number managed in non-specialist trauma units. Despite national guidance, variability persists in inpatient TBI management. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a newly developed regional guideline for the inpatient care of adult TBI patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary team developed a structured inpatient guideline addressing neurological observation, medication safety, imaging, escalation to neurosurgery, and discharge criteria. The guideline was disseminated across 12 Trauma Units in the East of England Trauma Network. The launch of the guideline was conducted over Microsoft Teams, with invitations sent to all specialties and disciplines across the Trauma Network. To assess its perceived impact, an online survey evaluating confidence, knowledge, and current practice was conducted among clinicians pre- and post-guideline implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 clinicians responded to the initial survey. Prior to the launch of the guideline, 39% of respondents reported the lack of clear guidance on when to perform repeat CT imaging for TBI, 78% were unsure of restarting anticoagulation, 55% were unclear on discharge criteria, and 83% were unaware of local neurorehabilitation pathways. Only 19% reported confidence in prescribing anti-epileptic drugs, and 8% in reversing anticoagulation. While GCS and pupil checks were commonly used, only 58% assessed limb power-a key sign of neurological deterioration. Overall, 90% supported the introduction of a structured inpatient guideline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight substantial gaps in clinician confidence and variability in practice for TBI patients managed in trauma units. The implementation of a regionally tailored inpatient guideline was well-received and has the potential to improve safety, consistency, and quality of TBI care outside specialist centres.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"645-651"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2025.2594517","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in adults, with a substantial number managed in non-specialist trauma units. Despite national guidance, variability persists in inpatient TBI management. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a newly developed regional guideline for the inpatient care of adult TBI patients.

Materials and methods: A multidisciplinary team developed a structured inpatient guideline addressing neurological observation, medication safety, imaging, escalation to neurosurgery, and discharge criteria. The guideline was disseminated across 12 Trauma Units in the East of England Trauma Network. The launch of the guideline was conducted over Microsoft Teams, with invitations sent to all specialties and disciplines across the Trauma Network. To assess its perceived impact, an online survey evaluating confidence, knowledge, and current practice was conducted among clinicians pre- and post-guideline implementation.

Results: A total of 64 clinicians responded to the initial survey. Prior to the launch of the guideline, 39% of respondents reported the lack of clear guidance on when to perform repeat CT imaging for TBI, 78% were unsure of restarting anticoagulation, 55% were unclear on discharge criteria, and 83% were unaware of local neurorehabilitation pathways. Only 19% reported confidence in prescribing anti-epileptic drugs, and 8% in reversing anticoagulation. While GCS and pupil checks were commonly used, only 58% assessed limb power-a key sign of neurological deterioration. Overall, 90% supported the introduction of a structured inpatient guideline.

Conclusions: The findings highlight substantial gaps in clinician confidence and variability in practice for TBI patients managed in trauma units. The implementation of a regionally tailored inpatient guideline was well-received and has the potential to improve safety, consistency, and quality of TBI care outside specialist centres.

实施创伤单位指导的住院管理成人创伤性脑损伤:横断面调查。
目的:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是成人发病率和死亡率的主要原因,有相当数量的非专科创伤单位管理。尽管有国家指导,住院患者TBI管理的可变性仍然存在。本研究旨在评估新制定的区域性指南对成人TBI患者住院治疗的影响。材料和方法:一个多学科团队制定了一个结构化的住院指南,涉及神经观察、药物安全、影像学、升级到神经外科和出院标准。该指南在英格兰东部创伤网络的12个创伤单位传播。该指南的发布是由微软团队进行的,并向创伤网络的所有专业和学科发出了邀请。为了评估其感知到的影响,在实施指南前后的临床医生中进行了一项在线调查,评估信心、知识和当前实践。结果:共有64名临床医生回应了初步调查。在该指南发布之前,39%的受访者表示缺乏关于何时对TBI进行重复CT成像的明确指导,78%的受访者不确定重新开始抗凝治疗,55%的受访者不清楚出院标准,83%的受访者不知道局部神经康复途径。只有19%的人对处方抗癫痫药物有信心,8%的人对逆转抗凝药物有信心。虽然GCS和瞳孔检查是常用的,但只有58%的人评估肢体力量——这是神经系统恶化的关键标志。总体而言,90%的人支持引入结构化住院指南。结论:研究结果突出了临床医生的信心和可变性在创伤单位管理的TBI患者实践中的实质性差距。区域定制住院指南的实施广受欢迎,并有可能提高专科中心以外TBI护理的安全性、一致性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书