Experimental study on the following behavior of pedestrians encountering those who go against the flow

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Accident; analysis and prevention Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2025.108337
Jianlin Li , Jun Zhang , Shuchao Cao , Xiangxia Ren , Weiguo Song , Eric Wai Ming Lee
{"title":"Experimental study on the following behavior of pedestrians encountering those who go against the flow","authors":"Jianlin Li ,&nbsp;Jun Zhang ,&nbsp;Shuchao Cao ,&nbsp;Xiangxia Ren ,&nbsp;Weiguo Song ,&nbsp;Eric Wai Ming Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pedestrian following behavior has a significant impact on crowd dynamics within transportation hubs, where dense and heterogeneous passenger flows pose substantial traffic risk challenges. However, empirical research on this behavior in such complex environments remains scarce, and many existing models still rely on subjective assumptions. This study bridges this gap through controlled experiments to investigate pedestrian following behavior during walking and running, which are typical movement states in transportation hub scenarios.<!--> <!-->The<!--> <!-->results demonstrate that pedestrians exhibit<!--> <!-->a<!--> <!-->lower willingness to follow others when running compared to walking. After ceasing one following behavior, more than 70% of pedestrians will initiate the next following within 0.5 s. Walking pedestrians tend to follow the individual within 2.49 m ahead with an angle rang of −53.77° to 50.25°, while the running pedestrians prefer to follow the one within 1.99 m ahead with an angle range of −80.83° to 57.21°, parameters that can inform spatial risk assessment in hub functional zones. Notably, no clear evidence shows that followers prefer pedestrians with larger speed differences or those whose movement directions align closely with their desired velocity direction. Additionally, during the following process, followers may switch their targets or cease following them. The study finds that “the distance between the follower and the leader” and “the number of pedestrians within the rectangular area formed by the positions of the follower and the leader” are the main driving factors for changes in the following behavior of followers in both walking and running states. Specifically, as these two factors increase, the probability of followers changing their following behavior also rises, which is vital for developing safety control strategies during passenger transfers. These findings are further compared with the assumptions about following behavior in previous models. This study enhances the understanding of pedestrian dynamics and aims to facilitate the integration of following behavior into crowd dynamics models, thereby improving the accuracy of evacuation models and supporting traffic risk prevention in hub systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"225 ","pages":"Article 108337"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525004257","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pedestrian following behavior has a significant impact on crowd dynamics within transportation hubs, where dense and heterogeneous passenger flows pose substantial traffic risk challenges. However, empirical research on this behavior in such complex environments remains scarce, and many existing models still rely on subjective assumptions. This study bridges this gap through controlled experiments to investigate pedestrian following behavior during walking and running, which are typical movement states in transportation hub scenarios. The results demonstrate that pedestrians exhibit a lower willingness to follow others when running compared to walking. After ceasing one following behavior, more than 70% of pedestrians will initiate the next following within 0.5 s. Walking pedestrians tend to follow the individual within 2.49 m ahead with an angle rang of −53.77° to 50.25°, while the running pedestrians prefer to follow the one within 1.99 m ahead with an angle range of −80.83° to 57.21°, parameters that can inform spatial risk assessment in hub functional zones. Notably, no clear evidence shows that followers prefer pedestrians with larger speed differences or those whose movement directions align closely with their desired velocity direction. Additionally, during the following process, followers may switch their targets or cease following them. The study finds that “the distance between the follower and the leader” and “the number of pedestrians within the rectangular area formed by the positions of the follower and the leader” are the main driving factors for changes in the following behavior of followers in both walking and running states. Specifically, as these two factors increase, the probability of followers changing their following behavior also rises, which is vital for developing safety control strategies during passenger transfers. These findings are further compared with the assumptions about following behavior in previous models. This study enhances the understanding of pedestrian dynamics and aims to facilitate the integration of following behavior into crowd dynamics models, thereby improving the accuracy of evacuation models and supporting traffic risk prevention in hub systems.
行人遇到逆行者跟随行为的实验研究。
行人跟随行为对交通枢纽内的人群动态具有重要影响,在交通枢纽内,密集和异质的客流构成了巨大的交通风险挑战。然而,在如此复杂的环境下,对这种行为的实证研究仍然很少,许多现有的模型仍然依赖于主观假设。本研究通过对照实验来研究行人在步行和跑步时的跟随行为,这是交通枢纽场景中典型的运动状态。结果表明,与步行相比,行人在跑步时表现出更低的跟随意愿。在停止一次跟随行为后,超过70%的行人会在0.5 s内发起下一次跟随。步行行人倾向于跟随前方2.49 m范围内的个体,角度范围为-53.77°~ 50.25°;跑步行人倾向于跟随前方1.99 m范围内的个体,角度范围为-80.83°~ 57.21°,这些参数可用于枢纽功能区空间风险评价。值得注意的是,没有明确的证据表明追随者更喜欢速度差异较大的行人,或者那些运动方向与他们期望的速度方向紧密一致的行人。此外,在接下来的过程中,追随者可能会改变他们的目标或停止关注他们。研究发现,“跟随者与领导者之间的距离”和“跟随者与领导者位置形成的矩形区域内的行人数量”是步行和跑步状态下跟随者跟随行为变化的主要驱动因素。具体来说,随着这两个因素的增加,跟随者改变跟随行为的概率也会增加,这对于制定乘客换乘过程中的安全控制策略至关重要。这些发现进一步与先前模型中关于跟随行为的假设进行了比较。本研究增强了对行人动力学的理解,旨在促进将跟随行为纳入人群动力学模型,从而提高疏散模型的准确性,支持枢纽系统的交通风险防范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书