Analysis of the influence of advanced maternal age on gestational and fetal outcomes.

IF 1.4
Rômulo Felipe Auler, Ramon Henrique Auler, Ana Clara Machado Teixeira, Giovanna Jost Tibolla, Vinícius Pessoa Nunes Vieira, Junior Bolsonelo, Edimárlei Gonsales Valério, Edison Capp
{"title":"Analysis of the influence of advanced maternal age on gestational and fetal outcomes.","authors":"Rômulo Felipe Auler, Ramon Henrique Auler, Ana Clara Machado Teixeira, Giovanna Jost Tibolla, Vinícius Pessoa Nunes Vieira, Junior Bolsonelo, Edimárlei Gonsales Valério, Edison Capp","doi":"10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Advanced maternal age has become more common due to factors such as increased academic preparation for women, labor market participation, delayed family planning, and advances in reproductive medicine. This phenomenon raises questions about the risks and gestational outcomes associated with advanced maternal age (AMA). This study aims to explore the gestational and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with AMA (> 35 years), comparing them with those of women aged 20 to 34 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research was conducted as an observational and retrospective analysis, examining data from 2012 to 2022 from the Hospital Production System (SIH/SUS) available on the DATAsus platform, covering all regions of Brazil. Variables analyzed included gestational duration, type of pregnancy (single or multiple), mode of delivery, Robson group, APGAR score at five minutes, birth weight, and occurrence of congenital anomalies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pregnant women with AMA showed statistically significant differences in the higher percentage of cesarean sections (63.3% AMA vs 58% non-AMA, p<0.05), higher percentage of low birth weight newborns (12.5% AMA vs 6.7% non-AMA, p<0.05), lower APGAR scores at the fifth minute (OR = 1.08, p<0.001) and a higher prevalence of any congenital anomalies (1.23% AMA vs 0.77% non-AMA, OR =OR = 1.34, p < 0.001). In addition, this group had a higher incidence of premature births (12.99% AMA vs 8.78% non-AMA) and multiple pregnancies (1.39% AMA vs 0.83% non-AMA). Furthermore, in the Robson classification, there was a predominance of older mothers in Group 5 (previous cesarean section) and in the groups with nulliparity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnant women with AMA face higher gestational and perinatal risks, such as preterm births and an increased need for cesarean sections. These findings underscore the importance of public policies and personalized management strategies to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes for older pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":74699,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":"47 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12671664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Advanced maternal age has become more common due to factors such as increased academic preparation for women, labor market participation, delayed family planning, and advances in reproductive medicine. This phenomenon raises questions about the risks and gestational outcomes associated with advanced maternal age (AMA). This study aims to explore the gestational and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with AMA (> 35 years), comparing them with those of women aged 20 to 34 years.

Methods: The research was conducted as an observational and retrospective analysis, examining data from 2012 to 2022 from the Hospital Production System (SIH/SUS) available on the DATAsus platform, covering all regions of Brazil. Variables analyzed included gestational duration, type of pregnancy (single or multiple), mode of delivery, Robson group, APGAR score at five minutes, birth weight, and occurrence of congenital anomalies.

Results: Pregnant women with AMA showed statistically significant differences in the higher percentage of cesarean sections (63.3% AMA vs 58% non-AMA, p<0.05), higher percentage of low birth weight newborns (12.5% AMA vs 6.7% non-AMA, p<0.05), lower APGAR scores at the fifth minute (OR = 1.08, p<0.001) and a higher prevalence of any congenital anomalies (1.23% AMA vs 0.77% non-AMA, OR =OR = 1.34, p < 0.001). In addition, this group had a higher incidence of premature births (12.99% AMA vs 8.78% non-AMA) and multiple pregnancies (1.39% AMA vs 0.83% non-AMA). Furthermore, in the Robson classification, there was a predominance of older mothers in Group 5 (previous cesarean section) and in the groups with nulliparity.

Conclusion: Pregnant women with AMA face higher gestational and perinatal risks, such as preterm births and an increased need for cesarean sections. These findings underscore the importance of public policies and personalized management strategies to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes for older pregnant women.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

高龄产妇对妊娠及胎儿结局的影响分析。
目的:由于妇女学业准备增加、劳动力市场参与、计划生育推迟以及生殖医学的进步等因素,高龄产妇变得越来越普遍。这种现象提出了与高龄产妇(AMA)相关的风险和妊娠结局的问题。本研究旨在探讨AMA (bb0 ~ 35岁)孕妇的妊娠和围产期结局,并将其与20 ~ 34岁妇女的妊娠和围产期结局进行比较。方法:本研究采用观察性和回顾性分析的方法,对DATAsus平台上的医院生产系统(SIH/SUS) 2012年至2022年的数据进行分析,涵盖巴西所有地区。分析的变量包括妊娠期、妊娠类型(单胎或多胎)、分娩方式、Robson组、5分钟APGAR评分、出生体重和先天性异常的发生。结果:AMA孕妇剖宫产率较高(63.3% AMA vs 58%非AMA)差异有统计学意义。结论:AMA孕妇面临更高的妊娠期和围产期风险,如早产和剖宫产需求增加。这些发现强调了公共政策和个性化管理策略对改善高龄孕妇孕产妇和新生儿结局的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书