Newborn clavicle fractures: 5 year-review of a tertiary-care hospital.

IF 1.4
Joana Rita Pinto Galvão, Mariana da Silva Leal, Margarida Neves Maciel da Silva, Nuno Miguel Sanches de Almeida, Carla Isabel Pereira Faustino Ferreira, Inês Maria Moreira Guedes Maia Nunes de Melo Seco
{"title":"Newborn clavicle fractures: 5 year-review of a tertiary-care hospital.","authors":"Joana Rita Pinto Galvão, Mariana da Silva Leal, Margarida Neves Maciel da Silva, Nuno Miguel Sanches de Almeida, Carla Isabel Pereira Faustino Ferreira, Inês Maria Moreira Guedes Maia Nunes de Melo Seco","doi":"10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Clavicle fractures are the most common birth-related fractures. They may cause pain, arm mobility impairment, and brachial nerve injury (temporary or definitive). Therefore, we aimed to review the incidence, risk factors and prognosis of neonatal clavicle fractures in our hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All cases of clavicle fractures diagnosed and registered during the neonatal period between 2018 and 2022, in a tertiary-care Portuguese hospital, were reviewed. Statistical descriptive analysis, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals(95%CI) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8132 births and 91 clavicle fractures were identified (1.1% incidence) - 0.04% (1/2512) in cesarean sections and 1.7% (90/5453) in vaginal births. An instrumental vaginal birth doubled the probability of clavicle fractures (OR 2.072, 95%CI 1.365-3.145 compared to spontaneous births). In 15.4% of clavicle fractures, births were complicated by shoulder dystocia. Shoulder dystocia significantly increased the risk of clavicle fracture (OR 35.71; 95% CI 17.86-71.43). Of the 91 cases, 22% resulted from pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes; in these cases, the risk of clavicle fractures increased 76% (OR 1.761, 95%CI 1.068-2.904). Most of the cases were referred to a Neonatology follow-up appointment (92.3%). Fifteen neonates had a clinical suspicion of brachial plexus injury, but all of them regained normal arm mobility after physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of clavicle fractures in our hospital is comparable to the literature (1.1%). To reduce the incidence of clavicle fractures not only its risk factors must be reduced, but a simulation-based labor ward team training program on shoulder dystocia should also be implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":74699,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":"47 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12671675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Clavicle fractures are the most common birth-related fractures. They may cause pain, arm mobility impairment, and brachial nerve injury (temporary or definitive). Therefore, we aimed to review the incidence, risk factors and prognosis of neonatal clavicle fractures in our hospital.

Methods: All cases of clavicle fractures diagnosed and registered during the neonatal period between 2018 and 2022, in a tertiary-care Portuguese hospital, were reviewed. Statistical descriptive analysis, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals(95%CI) were calculated.

Results: A total of 8132 births and 91 clavicle fractures were identified (1.1% incidence) - 0.04% (1/2512) in cesarean sections and 1.7% (90/5453) in vaginal births. An instrumental vaginal birth doubled the probability of clavicle fractures (OR 2.072, 95%CI 1.365-3.145 compared to spontaneous births). In 15.4% of clavicle fractures, births were complicated by shoulder dystocia. Shoulder dystocia significantly increased the risk of clavicle fracture (OR 35.71; 95% CI 17.86-71.43). Of the 91 cases, 22% resulted from pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes; in these cases, the risk of clavicle fractures increased 76% (OR 1.761, 95%CI 1.068-2.904). Most of the cases were referred to a Neonatology follow-up appointment (92.3%). Fifteen neonates had a clinical suspicion of brachial plexus injury, but all of them regained normal arm mobility after physiotherapy.

Conclusion: The incidence of clavicle fractures in our hospital is comparable to the literature (1.1%). To reduce the incidence of clavicle fractures not only its risk factors must be reduced, but a simulation-based labor ward team training program on shoulder dystocia should also be implemented.

新生儿锁骨骨折:一家三级医院的5年回顾。
目的:锁骨骨折是最常见的出生相关骨折。它们可引起疼痛、手臂活动障碍和臂神经损伤(暂时性或永久性)。因此,我们旨在回顾我院新生儿锁骨骨折的发生率、危险因素及预后。方法:回顾2018年至2022年葡萄牙一家三级医院新生儿期诊断和登记的所有锁骨骨折病例。计算统计描述性分析、优势比(ORs)和95%置信区间(95% ci)。结果:共发生8132例分娩,91例锁骨骨折(发生率1.1%),其中剖宫产0.04%(1/2512),顺产1.7%(90/5453)。阴道分娩使锁骨骨折的可能性增加一倍(OR 2.072, 95%CI 1.365-3.145)。在15.4%的锁骨骨折中,分娩时并发肩难产。肩难产明显增加锁骨骨折的风险(OR 35.71; 95% CI 17.86-71.43)。91例中,22%是妊娠合并妊娠期糖尿病所致;在这些病例中,锁骨骨折的风险增加了76% (OR 1.7661, 95%CI 1.068-2.904)。大多数病例被转介到新生儿随访预约(92.3%)。15例新生儿临床怀疑臂丛神经损伤,经物理治疗后均恢复正常手臂活动能力。结论:我院锁骨骨折发生率与文献报道相当(1.1%)。为了减少锁骨骨折的发生率,不仅要减少其危险因素,而且还应实施基于模拟的产房团队肩关节难产培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书