Yujing Huang , Zhuofei Lin , Chenglin Zhou , Yingying Wang , Mengkai Luan
{"title":"Competitive sport experience is associated with reduced off-field aggression and distinct functional brain connectivity","authors":"Yujing Huang , Zhuofei Lin , Chenglin Zhou , Yingying Wang , Mengkai Luan","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.103051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While aggression has been widely studied in clinical and forensic contexts, its expression in healthy individuals, particularly athletes, is less well understood. Competitive sport experience may be linked to trait aggression through experience-related changes in large-scale brain networks, but the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to examine whether long-term engagement in competitive athletics is associated with intrinsic functional connectivity related to trait aggression, focusing on off-field behaviors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We combined group- and individual-level analyses to examine neural correlates of trait aggression in 84 athletes and 106 non-athletes. Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) was assessed using Network-Based Statistics (NBS) for group differences and Connectome-Based Predictive Modeling (CPM) to predict aggression traits from AQ-CV scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Athletes scored lower on total aggression and four of the five subscales. NBS identified a widespread subnetwork of stronger connectivity in athletes, spanning nine brain networks. CPM revealed that total and physical aggression were predicted by distributed RSFC patterns, primarily negative associations across prefrontal, motor, and subcortical regions. Self-directed aggression was predicted by a smaller, more selective network. Notably, four overlapping edges linked NBS and CPM findings, connecting group-level differences to individual aggression variability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings suggest that competitive sport experience is associated with distinct functional integration across brain systems involved in emotion regulation and motor control, which may underlie athletes’ reduced off-field aggression. This work provides novel insights into the neural basis of aggression in non-clinical populations and highlights the value of combining multilevel connectivity analyses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54536,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 103051"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S146902922500250X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
While aggression has been widely studied in clinical and forensic contexts, its expression in healthy individuals, particularly athletes, is less well understood. Competitive sport experience may be linked to trait aggression through experience-related changes in large-scale brain networks, but the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear.
Objective
This study aimed to examine whether long-term engagement in competitive athletics is associated with intrinsic functional connectivity related to trait aggression, focusing on off-field behaviors.
Methods
We combined group- and individual-level analyses to examine neural correlates of trait aggression in 84 athletes and 106 non-athletes. Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) was assessed using Network-Based Statistics (NBS) for group differences and Connectome-Based Predictive Modeling (CPM) to predict aggression traits from AQ-CV scores.
Results
Athletes scored lower on total aggression and four of the five subscales. NBS identified a widespread subnetwork of stronger connectivity in athletes, spanning nine brain networks. CPM revealed that total and physical aggression were predicted by distributed RSFC patterns, primarily negative associations across prefrontal, motor, and subcortical regions. Self-directed aggression was predicted by a smaller, more selective network. Notably, four overlapping edges linked NBS and CPM findings, connecting group-level differences to individual aggression variability.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that competitive sport experience is associated with distinct functional integration across brain systems involved in emotion regulation and motor control, which may underlie athletes’ reduced off-field aggression. This work provides novel insights into the neural basis of aggression in non-clinical populations and highlights the value of combining multilevel connectivity analyses.
期刊介绍:
Psychology of Sport and Exercise is an international forum for scholarly reports in the psychology of sport and exercise, broadly defined. The journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Manuscripts that will be considered for publication will present results from high quality empirical research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries concerning already published PSE papers or topics of general interest for PSE readers, protocol papers for trials, and reports of professional practice (which will need to demonstrate academic rigour and go beyond mere description). The CONSORT guidelines consort-statement need to be followed for protocol papers for trials; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the CONSORT checklist. For meta-analysis, the PRISMA prisma-statement guidelines should be followed; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the PRISMA checklist. For systematic reviews it is recommended that the PRISMA guidelines are followed, although it is not compulsory. Authors interested in submitting replications of published studies need to contact the Editors-in-Chief before they start their replication. We are not interested in manuscripts that aim to test the psychometric properties of an existing scale from English to another language, unless new validation methods are used which address previously unanswered research questions.