Christopher Bendkowski, Adam P Levine, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo, Laurence B Lovat, Marco Novelli, Michael Shaw
{"title":"VS-FPM: Large-Format, Label-Free Virtual Histopathology Microscopy.","authors":"Christopher Bendkowski, Adam P Levine, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo, Laurence B Lovat, Marco Novelli, Michael Shaw","doi":"10.34133/bmef.0206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This article describes a new method (VS-FPM) for analysis of unstained tissues based on the application of supervised machine learning to generate brightfield hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images from phase images recovered using Fourier ptychographic microscopy (FPM). <b>Impact Statement:</b> VS-FPM has several advantages for label-free digital pathology. Capture of complex image information simplifies model training and allows post-capture refocusing. FPM images combine high resolution with a large field of view, and the hardware is low-cost and compatible with many existing brightfield microscope systems. <b>Introduction:</b> By generating realistic histologically stained images from label-free image data, virtual staining (VS) methods have the potential to streamline clinical workflows, improve image consistency, and enable new ways of visualizing and analyzing histological tissues. <b>Methods:</b> We trained a conditional generative adversarial network to translate high-resolution FPM images of unstained tissues to brightfield H&E images and assessed the method using diagnosis of colonic polyps as a test case. <b>Results:</b> We found no statistically significant difference between the spatial resolution of FPM images captured at 4× magnification and images from a pathology slide scanner at 20× magnification. Visual assessment and image similarity metrics showed that VS-FPM images of unstained tissues closely resemble images of chemically H&E-stained tissues. However, the spatial resolution of virtual H&E images was approximately 20% lower than equivalent images of chemically stained tissues. Using VS-FPM, board-certified pathologists were able to accurately distinguish normal from dysplastic tissues and derive correct pathological diagnoses. <b>Conclusion:</b> VS-FPM is a reliable, accessible VS method that also overcomes many other limitations inherent to histopathology microscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":72430,"journal":{"name":"BME frontiers","volume":"6 ","pages":"0206"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BME frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/bmef.0206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This article describes a new method (VS-FPM) for analysis of unstained tissues based on the application of supervised machine learning to generate brightfield hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images from phase images recovered using Fourier ptychographic microscopy (FPM). Impact Statement: VS-FPM has several advantages for label-free digital pathology. Capture of complex image information simplifies model training and allows post-capture refocusing. FPM images combine high resolution with a large field of view, and the hardware is low-cost and compatible with many existing brightfield microscope systems. Introduction: By generating realistic histologically stained images from label-free image data, virtual staining (VS) methods have the potential to streamline clinical workflows, improve image consistency, and enable new ways of visualizing and analyzing histological tissues. Methods: We trained a conditional generative adversarial network to translate high-resolution FPM images of unstained tissues to brightfield H&E images and assessed the method using diagnosis of colonic polyps as a test case. Results: We found no statistically significant difference between the spatial resolution of FPM images captured at 4× magnification and images from a pathology slide scanner at 20× magnification. Visual assessment and image similarity metrics showed that VS-FPM images of unstained tissues closely resemble images of chemically H&E-stained tissues. However, the spatial resolution of virtual H&E images was approximately 20% lower than equivalent images of chemically stained tissues. Using VS-FPM, board-certified pathologists were able to accurately distinguish normal from dysplastic tissues and derive correct pathological diagnoses. Conclusion: VS-FPM is a reliable, accessible VS method that also overcomes many other limitations inherent to histopathology microscopy.