Did COVID-19 impact perinatal outcomes differently in public and private maternity hospitals in Brazil?

IF 1.4
Ellen Machado Arlindo, Renato Teixeira Souza, Maria Laura Costa, Jose Guilherme Cecatti, Edson Vieira da Cunha, Janete Vettorazzi
{"title":"Did COVID-19 impact perinatal outcomes differently in public and private maternity hospitals in Brazil?","authors":"Ellen Machado Arlindo, Renato Teixeira Souza, Maria Laura Costa, Jose Guilherme Cecatti, Edson Vieira da Cunha, Janete Vettorazzi","doi":"10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) infection among admissions in public and private maternity hospitals before COVID-19 vaccination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis of the REBRACO (in Portuguese, the Brazilian Network of COVID-19 During Pregnancy) initiative, a national multicenter cohort study in Brazil, considering pregnant and postpartum women with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections (from February 2020 to February 2021) in 15 maternity centers (2 private and 13 public facilities). Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics were compared according to the type of hospital care. The clinical and laboratory findings and maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. The prevalence ratio and its 95% confidence interval for each predictor and outcome were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 559 symptomatic cases tested, 289 confirmed COVID-19 cases were included, with 213 (72.7%) and 76 (27.3%) women in public and private hospitals, respectively. The frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection did not differ significantly between the groups. Women treated at public hospitals had lower education levels (p<0.001), and 50% declared that their pregnancy was unplanned. We recorded 13 maternal deaths among women treated at public hospitals and no maternal deaths among pregnant women treated at private hospitals (p=0.024). Pregnant women in public hospitals had higher rates of fever (p=0.041), tachypnea (p=0.003), abnormal laboratory findings of liver enzymes (p=0.005), and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) (p=0.014), and their neonates presented with more neonatal respiratory distress (p=0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes were worse in the public hospital group, with increased rates of SARS and neonatal respiratory distress. The alarming difference in the number of deaths between patients treated in the public and private sectors highlights the urgency of better understanding the social determinants of health and calls the attention of leaders and policymakers to take action in mitigating their impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":74699,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":"47 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12671685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) infection among admissions in public and private maternity hospitals before COVID-19 vaccination.

Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the REBRACO (in Portuguese, the Brazilian Network of COVID-19 During Pregnancy) initiative, a national multicenter cohort study in Brazil, considering pregnant and postpartum women with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections (from February 2020 to February 2021) in 15 maternity centers (2 private and 13 public facilities). Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics were compared according to the type of hospital care. The clinical and laboratory findings and maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. The prevalence ratio and its 95% confidence interval for each predictor and outcome were calculated.

Results: Of the 559 symptomatic cases tested, 289 confirmed COVID-19 cases were included, with 213 (72.7%) and 76 (27.3%) women in public and private hospitals, respectively. The frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection did not differ significantly between the groups. Women treated at public hospitals had lower education levels (p<0.001), and 50% declared that their pregnancy was unplanned. We recorded 13 maternal deaths among women treated at public hospitals and no maternal deaths among pregnant women treated at private hospitals (p=0.024). Pregnant women in public hospitals had higher rates of fever (p=0.041), tachypnea (p=0.003), abnormal laboratory findings of liver enzymes (p=0.005), and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) (p=0.014), and their neonates presented with more neonatal respiratory distress (p=0.020).

Conclusion: Adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes were worse in the public hospital group, with increased rates of SARS and neonatal respiratory distress. The alarming difference in the number of deaths between patients treated in the public and private sectors highlights the urgency of better understanding the social determinants of health and calls the attention of leaders and policymakers to take action in mitigating their impact.

Abstract Image

COVID-19对巴西公立和私立妇产医院围产期结局的影响是否不同?
目的:比较公立和私立妇产医院收治的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS- CoV-2)感染孕妇和产后妇女在接种COVID-19疫苗前的孕产妇和围产期结局。方法:我们对REBRACO(葡萄牙语,巴西妊娠期间COVID-19网络)倡议进行了二次分析,这是巴西的一项全国性多中心队列研究,考虑了15个产科中心(2个私人和13个公共设施)疑似或确诊SARS-CoV-2感染的孕妇和产后妇女(2020年2月至2021年2月)。根据医院护理的类型比较了社会人口统计学和产科特征。比较两组患者的临床和实验室检查结果以及产妇和围产期结局。计算每个预测因子和结果的患病率及其95%置信区间。结果:559例有症状病例中,确诊病例289例,其中公立医院和私立医院女性分别占213例(72.7%)和76例(27.3%)。两组间SARS-CoV-2感染频率无显著差异。结论:在公立医院就诊的妇女受教育程度较低(结论:公立医院组的孕产妇和围产期不良结局更差,SARS和新生儿呼吸窘迫发生率增加。在公共部门和私营部门接受治疗的患者之间的死亡人数存在惊人差异,这突出表明迫切需要更好地了解健康的社会决定因素,并呼吁领导人和决策者注意采取行动,减轻其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书