Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns and Prevalence of Salmonella Species in Blood Samples: Insights From a Tertiary Care Center in Nepal.

Q3 Immunology and Microbiology
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-11-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ipid/9167226
Shiv Kumar Sah, Dhruba Dhungana, Shiva Pandeya, Arjun Budthapa, Deepak Basyal, Balmukunda Regmi, Junu Ricchinbung Rai
{"title":"Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns and Prevalence of <i>Salmonella</i> Species in Blood Samples: Insights From a Tertiary Care Center in Nepal.","authors":"Shiv Kumar Sah, Dhruba Dhungana, Shiva Pandeya, Arjun Budthapa, Deepak Basyal, Balmukunda Regmi, Junu Ricchinbung Rai","doi":"10.1155/ipid/9167226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Typhoidal <i>Salmonella</i> infections remain a significant public health concern in low- and middle-income countries, with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) posing a major challenge. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and AMR patterns of <i>Salmonella</i> species in clinical samples from a tertiary care center in Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted at the microbiology department in the country's largest public tertiary care hospital, TUTH, Nepal. A retrospective analysis was performed on 16,579 clinical specimens with culture-confirmed <i>Salmonella</i> isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Resistance and susceptibility trends were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 16,579 clinical samples analyzed, enteric fever was identified in 114 cases (0.7%). Of these, <i>Salmonella</i> Typhi accounted for 77.2%, while <i>Salmonella</i> Paratyphi comprised 22.8%. No multidrug resistance was observed, and all isolates were susceptible to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (e.g., cefixime, ceftriaxone, and cefepime) and β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam).<i>Salmonella</i> Paratyphi showed 100% sensitivity to ampicillin, amoxicillin, and cotrimoxazole, while susceptibility to chloramphenicol was high for both <i>S.</i> Typhi (88.9%) and <i>S.</i> Paratyphi (92.9%). Gentamicin exhibited comparatively lower sensitivity, with rates of 78.3% for <i>S.</i> Typhi and 80% for <i>S.</i> Paratyphi. Ciprofloxacin showed the lowest susceptibility, at 47.6% for <i>S.</i> Typhi and 60% for <i>S.</i> Paratyphi.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified a lower prevalence of culture-confirmed typhoidal <i>Salmonella</i> infections, with <i>Salmonella</i> Typhi predominating over <i>Salmonella</i> Paratyphi. High resistance to ciprofloxacin and gentamicin was observed, while susceptibility to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole re-emerged, suggesting their potential for reintroduction in treatment. No multidrug resistance or resistance to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (e.g., cefixime, ceftriaxone, cefepime) and β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam) was noted, supporting their reliability for empirical therapy. These findings underscore the need for ongoing antimicrobial surveillance to guide effective treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":39128,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9167226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12672062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ipid/9167226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Typhoidal Salmonella infections remain a significant public health concern in low- and middle-income countries, with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) posing a major challenge. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and AMR patterns of Salmonella species in clinical samples from a tertiary care center in Nepal.

Methods: The study was conducted at the microbiology department in the country's largest public tertiary care hospital, TUTH, Nepal. A retrospective analysis was performed on 16,579 clinical specimens with culture-confirmed Salmonella isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Resistance and susceptibility trends were analyzed.

Results: Among 16,579 clinical samples analyzed, enteric fever was identified in 114 cases (0.7%). Of these, Salmonella Typhi accounted for 77.2%, while Salmonella Paratyphi comprised 22.8%. No multidrug resistance was observed, and all isolates were susceptible to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (e.g., cefixime, ceftriaxone, and cefepime) and β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam).Salmonella Paratyphi showed 100% sensitivity to ampicillin, amoxicillin, and cotrimoxazole, while susceptibility to chloramphenicol was high for both S. Typhi (88.9%) and S. Paratyphi (92.9%). Gentamicin exhibited comparatively lower sensitivity, with rates of 78.3% for S. Typhi and 80% for S. Paratyphi. Ciprofloxacin showed the lowest susceptibility, at 47.6% for S. Typhi and 60% for S. Paratyphi.

Conclusion: Our study identified a lower prevalence of culture-confirmed typhoidal Salmonella infections, with Salmonella Typhi predominating over Salmonella Paratyphi. High resistance to ciprofloxacin and gentamicin was observed, while susceptibility to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole re-emerged, suggesting their potential for reintroduction in treatment. No multidrug resistance or resistance to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (e.g., cefixime, ceftriaxone, cefepime) and β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam) was noted, supporting their reliability for empirical therapy. These findings underscore the need for ongoing antimicrobial surveillance to guide effective treatment strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

抗菌素耐药性模式和沙门氏菌在血液样本中的流行:来自尼泊尔三级保健中心的见解。
背景:伤寒沙门氏菌感染仍然是低收入和中等收入国家的一个重大公共卫生问题,抗菌素耐药性(AMR)构成了一个重大挑战。本研究旨在评估尼泊尔某三级保健中心临床样本中沙门氏菌的流行情况和耐药性模式。方法:该研究在尼泊尔最大的公立三级保健医院(TUTH)的微生物科进行。回顾性分析了16579例经培养确认的沙门氏菌临床标本。采用Kirby-Bauer纸片扩散法进行药敏试验。抗性和敏感性趋势分析。结果:16579例临床标本中,有114例(0.7%)出现肠热。其中,伤寒沙门氏菌占77.2%,副伤寒沙门氏菌占22.8%。未观察到多药耐药,所有分离株均对第三代和第四代头孢菌素(如头孢克肟、头孢曲松和头孢吡肟)和β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(如哌拉西林-他唑巴坦)敏感。副伤寒沙门菌对氨苄西林、阿莫西林和复方新诺明的敏感性均为100%,而伤寒沙门菌和副伤寒沙门菌对氯霉素的敏感性均较高(88.9%)。庆大霉素对伤寒链球菌和副伤寒链球菌的敏感性相对较低,分别为78.3%和80%。环丙沙星对伤寒链球菌和副伤寒链球菌的易感性最低,分别为47.6%和60%。结论:我们的研究确定了培养确认的伤寒沙门氏菌感染的患病率较低,伤寒沙门氏菌比副伤寒沙门氏菌占主导地位。观察到对环丙沙星和庆大霉素的高耐药性,而对氨苄西林、氯霉素和复方新诺明的敏感性再次出现,表明它们有可能被重新引入治疗。未发现对第三代和第四代头孢菌素(如头孢克肟、头孢曲松、头孢吡肟)和β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(如哌拉西林-他唑巴坦)的多药耐药或耐药,支持其经验治疗的可靠性。这些发现强调需要进行持续的抗微生物监测,以指导有效的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书