Calculations skills and patient safety: Motivational design for an undergraduate health sciences calculations course

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Camille E. Beauduy, Anna S. Milone, Angie T. Vollbrecht, Jody L. Lounsbery
{"title":"Calculations skills and patient safety: Motivational design for an undergraduate health sciences calculations course","authors":"Camille E. Beauduy,&nbsp;Anna S. Milone,&nbsp;Angie T. Vollbrecht,&nbsp;Jody L. Lounsbery","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pharmacists and other healthcare professionals must perform accurate calculations to prevent medication errors; however, studies have identified deficiency in PharmD student calculations skills, and data from the North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) show a consistent decline in calculations performance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To address this, an undergraduate-level, asynchronous online health sciences calculations course was developed, integrating patient safety concepts with foundational math skills. The course was designed using the ARCS motivation model, which includes the following components: attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction. These elements informed the course design, which intended to overcome challenges with student engagement in online learning environments. This study evaluated the motivational impact of the course using the validated Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) and open-ended questions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 32 students enrolled, 81 % completed the IMMS and 78 % answered the open-ended questions. Quantitative results showed high levels of student motivation, with an average IMMS score of 155.7 (out of 180) and all individual ARCS components scoring above the successful motivation threshold of 3.5. Qualitative analysis revealed several themes which positively influenced the ARCS components, including use of real-life examples, an organized and predictable course structure, scaffolded learning activities, and formative feedback.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The findings suggest that incorporating motivational design principles can be an effective strategy for developing engaging online courses that build calculations skills and enhance confidence in undergraduate students. This approach may better prepare students to apply knowledge in a PharmD curriculum and other professional programs for students pursuing health-related careers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"18 3","pages":"Article 102544"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129725002655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Pharmacists and other healthcare professionals must perform accurate calculations to prevent medication errors; however, studies have identified deficiency in PharmD student calculations skills, and data from the North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) show a consistent decline in calculations performance.

Methods

To address this, an undergraduate-level, asynchronous online health sciences calculations course was developed, integrating patient safety concepts with foundational math skills. The course was designed using the ARCS motivation model, which includes the following components: attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction. These elements informed the course design, which intended to overcome challenges with student engagement in online learning environments. This study evaluated the motivational impact of the course using the validated Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) and open-ended questions.

Results

Of the 32 students enrolled, 81 % completed the IMMS and 78 % answered the open-ended questions. Quantitative results showed high levels of student motivation, with an average IMMS score of 155.7 (out of 180) and all individual ARCS components scoring above the successful motivation threshold of 3.5. Qualitative analysis revealed several themes which positively influenced the ARCS components, including use of real-life examples, an organized and predictable course structure, scaffolded learning activities, and formative feedback.

Discussion

The findings suggest that incorporating motivational design principles can be an effective strategy for developing engaging online courses that build calculations skills and enhance confidence in undergraduate students. This approach may better prepare students to apply knowledge in a PharmD curriculum and other professional programs for students pursuing health-related careers.
计算技巧和病人安全:本科健康科学计算课程的动机设计。
药剂师和其他医疗保健专业人员必须执行准确的计算,以防止用药错误;然而,研究已经确定了药学博士学生计算能力的不足,北美药剂师执照考试(NAPLEX)的数据显示,计算能力持续下降。方法:为了解决这个问题,开发了一门本科水平的异步在线健康科学计算课程,将患者安全概念与基础数学技能相结合。本课程采用ARCS动机模型设计,该模型包括以下组成部分:注意力、相关性、信心和满意度。这些元素为课程设计提供了依据,旨在克服学生参与在线学习环境的挑战。本研究使用经过验证的教学材料动机调查(IMMS)和开放式问题来评估课程的动机影响。结果:32名学生中,81%的人完成了IMMS, 78%的人回答了开放式问题。定量结果显示,学生的动机水平很高,IMMS平均得分为155.7分(总分180分),所有单独的ARCS成分得分均高于3.5分的成功动机阈值。定性分析揭示了几个对ARCS组成部分有积极影响的主题,包括使用现实生活中的例子、有组织和可预测的课程结构、框架式学习活动和形成性反馈。讨论:研究结果表明,结合动机设计原则可以成为开发引人入胜的在线课程的有效策略,这些课程可以培养大学生的计算技能,增强他们的信心。这种方法可以更好地为学生在药学博士课程和其他专业课程中应用知识做好准备,为追求健康相关职业的学生提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书