Locomotion difficulty and need for home care: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista de saude publica Pub Date : 2025-12-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006939
Rogério da Silva Linhares, Elaine Thumé, Maria Laura Vidal Carrett, Everton José Fantinel, Maria Aurora Dropa Chrestani Cesar, Elaine Tomasi
{"title":"Locomotion difficulty and need for home care: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Rogério da Silva Linhares, Elaine Thumé, Maria Laura Vidal Carrett, Everton José Fantinel, Maria Aurora Dropa Chrestani Cesar, Elaine Tomasi","doi":"10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate home visits by physicians or nurses for consultations and procedures and associated factors in families with people with mobility difficulties and need for home care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was carried out with data from Ciclo III do Programa Nacional de Melhoria do Acesso e da Qualidade da Atenção Básica (Cycle III of the National Program for Access and Quality Improvement in Primary Care) from September 2017 to June 2018, interviewing over 140,000 users in 28,939 basic health units in 5,312 municipalities. This study analyzed home visits to individuals with mobility difficulties and the need for home care according to internal and external factors via a Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all primary healthcare service users, 7.8% stated that someone in their home had mobility difficulties and needed home care. About 70% received home visits. The highest prevalence of home visits, after adjusted analysis, occurred in the Brazilian Northeast. The greater the social vulnerability, the lower the prevalence of home visits in the case of mobility difficulties. Municipalities with 100% coverage from the family health strategy showed a higher prevalence of home visits than those with coverage below 50%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>External factors, such as income and social vulnerability index (which have a greater relation with macrosocial determinants), continue to point toward inequalities in care; whereas internal factors, such as family health coverage, community health agent coverage in all micro-areas, and the possibility of receiving care without prior appointments indicated better results. This study reinforces the importance of public policies that encourage complete family health teams to provide comprehensive care to the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":21230,"journal":{"name":"Revista de saude publica","volume":"59 ","pages":"e35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12673639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate home visits by physicians or nurses for consultations and procedures and associated factors in families with people with mobility difficulties and need for home care.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out with data from Ciclo III do Programa Nacional de Melhoria do Acesso e da Qualidade da Atenção Básica (Cycle III of the National Program for Access and Quality Improvement in Primary Care) from September 2017 to June 2018, interviewing over 140,000 users in 28,939 basic health units in 5,312 municipalities. This study analyzed home visits to individuals with mobility difficulties and the need for home care according to internal and external factors via a Poisson regression.

Results: Of all primary healthcare service users, 7.8% stated that someone in their home had mobility difficulties and needed home care. About 70% received home visits. The highest prevalence of home visits, after adjusted analysis, occurred in the Brazilian Northeast. The greater the social vulnerability, the lower the prevalence of home visits in the case of mobility difficulties. Municipalities with 100% coverage from the family health strategy showed a higher prevalence of home visits than those with coverage below 50%.

Conclusion: External factors, such as income and social vulnerability index (which have a greater relation with macrosocial determinants), continue to point toward inequalities in care; whereas internal factors, such as family health coverage, community health agent coverage in all micro-areas, and the possibility of receiving care without prior appointments indicated better results. This study reinforces the importance of public policies that encourage complete family health teams to provide comprehensive care to the population.

运动困难与家庭护理需求:一项横断面研究。
目的:调查有行动困难和需要家庭护理的家庭中医生或护士家访的会诊和程序及其相关因素。方法:利用2017年9月至2018年6月国家初级保健可及性和质量改善计划第三期(Ciclo III)的数据进行横断面研究,访问了5,312个城市28,939个基础卫生单位的14万多名用户。本研究利用泊松回归分析行动困难个体的家访及家庭照护需求,并根据内因与外因进行分析。结果:在所有初级卫生保健服务使用者中,7.8%的人表示他们家中有人有行动困难,需要家庭护理。约70%接受家访。经调整分析,家访的流行率最高的地区是巴西东北部。社会脆弱性越大,在行动困难的情况下,家访的盛行率就越低。家庭保健战略覆盖率为100%的城市,家访的流行率高于覆盖率低于50%的城市。结论:外部因素,如收入和社会脆弱性指数(与宏观社会决定因素有更大的关系),继续指向护理不平等;而内部因素,如家庭健康覆盖率、社区卫生机构在所有微观地区的覆盖率以及无需事先预约即可接受护理的可能性,则显示出更好的结果。这项研究强调了鼓励完整家庭保健小组向人口提供全面护理的公共政策的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de saude publica
Revista de saude publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Saúde Pública has the purpose of publishing original scientific contributions on topics of relevance to public health in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书