Dissatisfaction with SUS pharmaceutical services and nonadherence to medication use.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista de saude publica Pub Date : 2025-12-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006463
Poliana Vieira da Silva Menolli, Edmarlon Girotto
{"title":"Dissatisfaction with SUS pharmaceutical services and nonadherence to medication use.","authors":"Poliana Vieira da Silva Menolli, Edmarlon Girotto","doi":"10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the association between user dissatisfaction with the pharmaceutical services provided by the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) and nonadherence to medication use by patients with chronic non-communicable diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study with data from the service evaluation component of the Pesquisa Nacional sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos in Brazil, conducted from July to December 2014. In-person interviews were analyzed with SUS users aged 18 or over who had used medications for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia and had visited SUS pharmacies in the three months prior to the survey. The dependent variable was medication nonadherence, assessed through three measures: nonadherence due to lack of medication, nonadherence in the past seven days and declared nonadherence. The independent variable was dissatisfaction with the dimensions of pharmaceutical services (timeliness, availability, and accommodation), measured using item response theory. Logistic regression was performed to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,448 users were evaluated. Nonadherence due to lack of medication was 31.6%; in the past seven days was 11.5%; and declared nonadherence 13.0%. Lack of access and forgetfulness were the main reasons for nonadherence in the past seven days. In the adjusted analysis, dissatisfaction with the \"timeliness\" dimension was associated with nonadherence in the past seven days (OR = 1.489; 95%CI: 1.023-2.168) and the \"accommodation\" dimension was associated with declared nonadherence (OR = 3.132; 95%CI: 2.266-4.329).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dissatisfied users were more likely to be nonadherent to medication use across all service dimensions, and dissatisfaction with the availability and accommodation of pharmaceutical services was associated with nonadherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":21230,"journal":{"name":"Revista de saude publica","volume":"59 ","pages":"e36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12673644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the association between user dissatisfaction with the pharmaceutical services provided by the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) and nonadherence to medication use by patients with chronic non-communicable diseases.

Methods: A cross-sectional study with data from the service evaluation component of the Pesquisa Nacional sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos in Brazil, conducted from July to December 2014. In-person interviews were analyzed with SUS users aged 18 or over who had used medications for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia and had visited SUS pharmacies in the three months prior to the survey. The dependent variable was medication nonadherence, assessed through three measures: nonadherence due to lack of medication, nonadherence in the past seven days and declared nonadherence. The independent variable was dissatisfaction with the dimensions of pharmaceutical services (timeliness, availability, and accommodation), measured using item response theory. Logistic regression was performed to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR).

Results: A total of 2,448 users were evaluated. Nonadherence due to lack of medication was 31.6%; in the past seven days was 11.5%; and declared nonadherence 13.0%. Lack of access and forgetfulness were the main reasons for nonadherence in the past seven days. In the adjusted analysis, dissatisfaction with the "timeliness" dimension was associated with nonadherence in the past seven days (OR = 1.489; 95%CI: 1.023-2.168) and the "accommodation" dimension was associated with declared nonadherence (OR = 3.132; 95%CI: 2.266-4.329).

Conclusion: Dissatisfied users were more likely to be nonadherent to medication use across all service dimensions, and dissatisfaction with the availability and accommodation of pharmaceutical services was associated with nonadherence.

不满意SUS药品服务和不遵守用药。
目的:分析用户对巴西统一卫生系统(SUS)提供的药学服务的不满与慢性非传染性疾病患者不遵医嘱用药之间的关系。方法:采用2014年7 - 12月巴西国家医疗卫生服务评估机构、医疗卫生服务机构、医疗卫生服务机构、医疗卫生服务机构服务评估部分数据进行横断面研究。访谈对象为18岁或18岁以上曾使用高血压、糖尿病和血脂异常药物并在调查前3个月内去过SUS药房的SUS使用者。因变量是药物不依从,通过三种方法进行评估:由于缺乏药物的不依从,过去七天内的不依从和宣布的不依从。自变量是对药物服务维度(及时性、可用性和住宿)的不满意,使用项目反应理论测量。采用Logistic回归计算粗比值比和校正比值比(OR)。结果:共评估2448名用户。由于缺乏药物治疗导致的不依从性为31.6%;过去7天为11.5%;宣布不遵守的占13.0%。缺少通道和健忘是过去七天不遵守规定的主要原因。在调整分析中,对“及时性”维度的不满意与过去7天内的不遵守相关(OR = 1.489; 95%CI: 1.023-2.168),而“迁就性”维度与声明的不遵守相关(OR = 3.132; 95%CI: 2.266-4.329)。结论:不满意的用户更有可能在所有服务维度上不坚持用药,对药物服务的可获得性和适应性的不满意与不坚持用药有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de saude publica
Revista de saude publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Saúde Pública has the purpose of publishing original scientific contributions on topics of relevance to public health in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书