Facilitation of supplementary motor area activity modulates the sense of effort: a theta burst stimulation study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuroscience Letters Pub Date : 2026-02-15 Epub Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2025.138482
Taishi Okegawa , Daiki Yamasaki , Naotsugu Kaneko , Kimitaka Nakazawa
{"title":"Facilitation of supplementary motor area activity modulates the sense of effort: a theta burst stimulation study","authors":"Taishi Okegawa ,&nbsp;Daiki Yamasaki ,&nbsp;Naotsugu Kaneko ,&nbsp;Kimitaka Nakazawa","doi":"10.1016/j.neulet.2025.138482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The sense of effort, defined as the phenomenological experience of invested physical resources in the task, is a critical component of motor control. The supplementary motor area (SMA) has been implicated in generating this sense, yet it remains unclear how modulating SMA activity affects unconscious motor output when individuals intend to exert the same level of effort. The present study aimed to investigate how inhibiting and facilitating SMA activity influences the subjective sense of effort and associated motor output.</div><div>Twelve healthy volunteers received both facilitatory and inhibitory theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) applied to the SMA. We assessed corticospinal excitability, submaximal effort force production in an index finger abduction task (at a subjective effort level of 35% without visual feedback), and force-matching performance before and after the TBS protocols.</div><div>Results showed that facilitatory TBS led to a significant reduction in the submaximal index finger abduction force, which was accompanied by decreased EMG activity. In contrast, inhibitory TBS did not produce significant changes in submaximal force. Importantly, TBS applied to the SMA did not significantly alter motor-evoked potentials, indicating that corticospinal excitability remained unchanged. These findings suggest that enhanced SMA activity increases the effort required to produce a given force. The underlying mechanism likely involves changes in efference copy signals, as the effect occurred without altering the corticospinal excitability. In addition, force-matching performance was improved at 30 min after facilitatory TBS applied to the SMA. This delayed behavioral improvement may suggest a time-dependent modulation of sensorimotor processing, possibly involving the SMA and posterior parietal cortex, although network-level mechanisms remain speculative.</div><div>This study provides causal evidence for the SMA’s role in processing effort-related signals and contributes to a growing understanding of the cortical mechanisms underlying the sense of effort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19290,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Letters","volume":"872 ","pages":"Article 138482"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304394025003714","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sense of effort, defined as the phenomenological experience of invested physical resources in the task, is a critical component of motor control. The supplementary motor area (SMA) has been implicated in generating this sense, yet it remains unclear how modulating SMA activity affects unconscious motor output when individuals intend to exert the same level of effort. The present study aimed to investigate how inhibiting and facilitating SMA activity influences the subjective sense of effort and associated motor output.
Twelve healthy volunteers received both facilitatory and inhibitory theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) applied to the SMA. We assessed corticospinal excitability, submaximal effort force production in an index finger abduction task (at a subjective effort level of 35% without visual feedback), and force-matching performance before and after the TBS protocols.
Results showed that facilitatory TBS led to a significant reduction in the submaximal index finger abduction force, which was accompanied by decreased EMG activity. In contrast, inhibitory TBS did not produce significant changes in submaximal force. Importantly, TBS applied to the SMA did not significantly alter motor-evoked potentials, indicating that corticospinal excitability remained unchanged. These findings suggest that enhanced SMA activity increases the effort required to produce a given force. The underlying mechanism likely involves changes in efference copy signals, as the effect occurred without altering the corticospinal excitability. In addition, force-matching performance was improved at 30 min after facilitatory TBS applied to the SMA. This delayed behavioral improvement may suggest a time-dependent modulation of sensorimotor processing, possibly involving the SMA and posterior parietal cortex, although network-level mechanisms remain speculative.
This study provides causal evidence for the SMA’s role in processing effort-related signals and contributes to a growing understanding of the cortical mechanisms underlying the sense of effort.
辅助运动区活动的促进调节努力感:一项θ波爆发刺激研究。
努力感被定义为在任务中投入体力资源的现象学经验,是运动控制的关键组成部分。辅助运动区(SMA)与产生这种感觉有关,但当个体打算施加相同水平的努力时,调节SMA活动如何影响无意识运动输出仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨抑制和促进SMA活动如何影响主观努力感和相关的运动输出。12名健康志愿者同时接受了促进性和抑制性经颅磁刺激(TBS)。我们评估了皮质脊髓兴奋性、食指外展任务(在没有视觉反馈的情况下主观努力水平为35%)的次最大努力力产生,以及TBS方案前后的力匹配表现。结果表明,促进性TBS可显著降低大鼠食指次最大外展力,并伴有肌电活动降低。相比之下,抑制性TBS不产生显著的亚极大力变化。重要的是,对SMA施加TBS并没有显著改变运动诱发电位,这表明皮质脊髓兴奋性保持不变。这些发现表明,增强的SMA活动增加了产生给定力所需的努力。潜在的机制可能涉及到影响复制信号的变化,因为这种效应发生时没有改变皮质脊髓的兴奋性。此外,在30 min时,将促进性TBS应用于SMA后,力匹配性能得到改善。这种延迟的行为改善可能表明感觉运动加工的时间依赖性调节,可能涉及SMA和后顶叶皮层,尽管网络层面的机制仍然是推测性的。本研究为SMA在处理努力相关信号中的作用提供了因果证据,并有助于加深对努力感背后的皮层机制的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience Letters
Neuroscience Letters 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
408
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience Letters is devoted to the rapid publication of short, high-quality papers of interest to the broad community of neuroscientists. Only papers which will make a significant addition to the literature in the field will be published. Papers in all areas of neuroscience - molecular, cellular, developmental, systems, behavioral and cognitive, as well as computational - will be considered for publication. Submission of laboratory investigations that shed light on disease mechanisms is encouraged. Special Issues, edited by Guest Editors to cover new and rapidly-moving areas, will include invited mini-reviews. Occasional mini-reviews in especially timely areas will be considered for publication, without invitation, outside of Special Issues; these un-solicited mini-reviews can be submitted without invitation but must be of very high quality. Clinical studies will also be published if they provide new information about organization or actions of the nervous system, or provide new insights into the neurobiology of disease. NSL does not publish case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书