Direct vs indirect ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolics from wild sumac (Rhus tripartita): Optimization by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and LC-MS profiling

IF 10.2 1区 化学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2025.107604
Nejib Hasnaoui , Amel Hamdi , Rocío Rodríguez-Arcos , Rafael Guillén-Bejarano , Ana Jiménez-Araujo
{"title":"Direct vs indirect ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolics from wild sumac (Rhus tripartita): Optimization by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and LC-MS profiling","authors":"Nejib Hasnaoui ,&nbsp;Amel Hamdi ,&nbsp;Rocío Rodríguez-Arcos ,&nbsp;Rafael Guillén-Bejarano ,&nbsp;Ana Jiménez-Araujo","doi":"10.1016/j.ultsonch.2025.107604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the potential of wild sumac (<em>Rhus tripartita</em>) fruits as a rich source of antioxidants. To achieve this, two ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) techniques—indirect (IUAE) and direct (DUAE)—were employed under predefined conditions to optimize antioxidant recovery. The extraction parameters for each method were investigated using response surface methodology (RSM) and Box-Behnken Design (BBD), focusing on three key factors for each method. The total phenolic content, quantified by the Folin-Ciocalteu method (TP-FC), was defined as the response variable. TP-FC values ranged from ∼ 6 to ∼ 12 mg GA eq./g DW for IUAE, and from 11 to 30 mg GA eq./g DW for DUAE. Quadratic models were developed and the determination coefficients exceeded 0.9 for both methods, confirming models’ reliability. ANOVA results indicated that temperature and time were the most influential factors in IUAE, while power and time were most impactful in DUAE. Overall, DUAE proved more efficiency than IUAE, yielding up to 26.74 mg GA eq./g DW under optimal conditions (53 %, 30 min, and 80 for power, time, and liquid/solid ratio, respectively). Furthermore, the DUAE obtained <em>R. tripartita</em> extract was profiled for its phenolic composition. LC-MS was used for initial identification of major phenolic compounds, followed by HPLC quantification using corresponding standards. Ten compounds were unequivocally identified. Notably, masazinoflavanone, first identified in 2005, was systematically quantified for the first time in <em>R. tripartita</em>, emerging as the predominant compound at 36.6 mg/g DW, which accounted for 82 % of total phenolics. Other identified compounds included more common molecules, like amentoflavone, myricetin, and quercetin derivatives, with contents ranging from 0.21 and 3.47 mg/g DW.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":442,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasonics Sonochemistry","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 107604"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasonics Sonochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350417725003839","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the potential of wild sumac (Rhus tripartita) fruits as a rich source of antioxidants. To achieve this, two ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) techniques—indirect (IUAE) and direct (DUAE)—were employed under predefined conditions to optimize antioxidant recovery. The extraction parameters for each method were investigated using response surface methodology (RSM) and Box-Behnken Design (BBD), focusing on three key factors for each method. The total phenolic content, quantified by the Folin-Ciocalteu method (TP-FC), was defined as the response variable. TP-FC values ranged from ∼ 6 to ∼ 12 mg GA eq./g DW for IUAE, and from 11 to 30 mg GA eq./g DW for DUAE. Quadratic models were developed and the determination coefficients exceeded 0.9 for both methods, confirming models’ reliability. ANOVA results indicated that temperature and time were the most influential factors in IUAE, while power and time were most impactful in DUAE. Overall, DUAE proved more efficiency than IUAE, yielding up to 26.74 mg GA eq./g DW under optimal conditions (53 %, 30 min, and 80 for power, time, and liquid/solid ratio, respectively). Furthermore, the DUAE obtained R. tripartita extract was profiled for its phenolic composition. LC-MS was used for initial identification of major phenolic compounds, followed by HPLC quantification using corresponding standards. Ten compounds were unequivocally identified. Notably, masazinoflavanone, first identified in 2005, was systematically quantified for the first time in R. tripartita, emerging as the predominant compound at 36.6 mg/g DW, which accounted for 82 % of total phenolics. Other identified compounds included more common molecules, like amentoflavone, myricetin, and quercetin derivatives, with contents ranging from 0.21 and 3.47 mg/g DW.
直接与间接超声辅助提取野生漆树酚类物质:响应面法和LC-MS优化
本研究探讨了野生漆树(Rhus tripartita)果实作为抗氧化剂的丰富来源。为了实现这一目标,在预先设定的条件下,采用间接(IUAE)和直接(DUAE)两种超声辅助提取(UAE)技术来优化抗氧化回收率。采用响应面法(RSM)和Box-Behnken设计(BBD)对每种方法的提取参数进行了研究,重点研究了每种方法的三个关键因素。以Folin-Ciocalteu法(TP-FC)测定的总酚含量为响应变量。IUAE的TP-FC值为~ 6 ~ ~ 12 mg GA当量/g DW, DUAE的TP-FC值为11 ~ 30 mg GA当量/g DW。建立了二次模型,两种方法的决定系数均大于0.9,验证了模型的可靠性。方差分析结果显示,温度和时间是影响IUAE的主要因素,而功率和时间是影响DUAE的主要因素。总的来说,DUAE比IUAE更有效,在最佳条件下(分别为53%,30分钟和80分钟的功率,时间和液固比),DUAE的产率高达26.74 mg GA当量/g DW。此外,还对DUAE得到的三叶草提取物的酚类成分进行了表征。采用液相色谱-质谱法对主要酚类化合物进行初步鉴定,然后采用相应的标准品进行HPLC定量。明确鉴定了10个化合物。值得注意的是,2005年首次在三叶草中系统地定量鉴定出了马萨兹黄酮,其含量为36.6 mg/g DW,占总酚类物质的82%。其他鉴定出的化合物包括更常见的分子,如阿门托黄酮、杨梅素和槲皮素衍生物,其含量在0.21至3.47毫克/克DW之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
361
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasonics Sonochemistry stands as a premier international journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality research articles primarily focusing on chemical reactions and reactors induced by ultrasonic waves, known as sonochemistry. Beyond chemical reactions, the journal also welcomes contributions related to cavitation-induced events and processing, including sonoluminescence, and the transformation of materials on chemical, physical, and biological levels. Since its inception in 1994, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry has consistently maintained a top ranking in the "Acoustics" category, reflecting its esteemed reputation in the field. The journal publishes exceptional papers covering various areas of ultrasonics and sonochemistry. Its contributions are highly regarded by both academia and industry stakeholders, demonstrating its relevance and impact in advancing research and innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书