Izabella Ilea , Dániel Jenei , István Csertő , Andrea S. Gubik , Orsolya Vincze
{"title":"Different ways of being generative. Exploring the motivational structure underlying generativity in life stories of entrepreneurial leaders","authors":"Izabella Ilea , Dániel Jenei , István Csertő , Andrea S. Gubik , Orsolya Vincze","doi":"10.1016/j.scaman.2025.101436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of agentic and communal motivations, along with the resultant potential to be generative, constitutes not merely a suggestion for present-day business actors, but a duty. Through such integration, these actors are able not only to enhance the profitability of their businesses, but also to advance the welfare of their workforce and contribute to the improvement of society. The present studies aim to demonstrate that individuals in different occupations can have a different motivational composition behind their generative aspirations. We examined this using mixed methods among three groups: entrepreneur leaders, teachers, and control groups. We used the Loyola Generativity Scale (N = 117) and life story interviews (N = 90), in which we coded themes of agency and communion, and also included the economic indicators of the companies in an exploratory manner. The control group exhibits the lowest level of generativity, whereas both teachers and entrepreneurs demonstrate higher levels of generativity. Moreover, the life narratives of teachers primarily encompass communal themes, whereas the narratives of entrepreneurial leaders focus predominantly on agentic topics. However, both groups were equally adept at integrating the two motivational aspects. The findings offer empirical support for the notion that generativity may be organized based on varying motivations. Both agentic and communal motivations may indicate elevated aspirations for generativity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47759,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","volume":"41 4","pages":"Article 101436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522125000417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The integration of agentic and communal motivations, along with the resultant potential to be generative, constitutes not merely a suggestion for present-day business actors, but a duty. Through such integration, these actors are able not only to enhance the profitability of their businesses, but also to advance the welfare of their workforce and contribute to the improvement of society. The present studies aim to demonstrate that individuals in different occupations can have a different motivational composition behind their generative aspirations. We examined this using mixed methods among three groups: entrepreneur leaders, teachers, and control groups. We used the Loyola Generativity Scale (N = 117) and life story interviews (N = 90), in which we coded themes of agency and communion, and also included the economic indicators of the companies in an exploratory manner. The control group exhibits the lowest level of generativity, whereas both teachers and entrepreneurs demonstrate higher levels of generativity. Moreover, the life narratives of teachers primarily encompass communal themes, whereas the narratives of entrepreneurial leaders focus predominantly on agentic topics. However, both groups were equally adept at integrating the two motivational aspects. The findings offer empirical support for the notion that generativity may be organized based on varying motivations. Both agentic and communal motivations may indicate elevated aspirations for generativity.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Management (SJM) provides an international forum for innovative and carefully crafted research on different aspects of management. We promote dialogue and new thinking around theory and practice, based on conceptual creativity, reasoned reflexivity and contextual awareness. We have a passion for empirical inquiry. We promote constructive dialogue among researchers as well as between researchers and practitioners. We encourage new approaches to the study of management and we aim to foster new thinking around management theory and practice. We publish original empirical and theoretical material, which contributes to understanding management in private and public organizations. Full-length articles and book reviews form the core of the journal, but focused discussion-type texts (around 3.000-5.000 words), empirically or theoretically oriented, can also be considered for publication. The Scandinavian Journal of Management is open to different research approaches in terms of methodology and epistemology. We are open to different fields of management application, but narrow technical discussions relevant only to specific sub-fields will not be given priority.