Different ways of being generative. Exploring the motivational structure underlying generativity in life stories of entrepreneurial leaders

IF 2.5 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Scandinavian Journal of Management Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-27 DOI:10.1016/j.scaman.2025.101436
Izabella Ilea , Dániel Jenei , István Csertő , Andrea S. Gubik , Orsolya Vincze
{"title":"Different ways of being generative. Exploring the motivational structure underlying generativity in life stories of entrepreneurial leaders","authors":"Izabella Ilea ,&nbsp;Dániel Jenei ,&nbsp;István Csertő ,&nbsp;Andrea S. Gubik ,&nbsp;Orsolya Vincze","doi":"10.1016/j.scaman.2025.101436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of agentic and communal motivations, along with the resultant potential to be generative, constitutes not merely a suggestion for present-day business actors, but a duty. Through such integration, these actors are able not only to enhance the profitability of their businesses, but also to advance the welfare of their workforce and contribute to the improvement of society. The present studies aim to demonstrate that individuals in different occupations can have a different motivational composition behind their generative aspirations. We examined this using mixed methods among three groups: entrepreneur leaders, teachers, and control groups. We used the Loyola Generativity Scale (N = 117) and life story interviews (N = 90), in which we coded themes of agency and communion, and also included the economic indicators of the companies in an exploratory manner. The control group exhibits the lowest level of generativity, whereas both teachers and entrepreneurs demonstrate higher levels of generativity. Moreover, the life narratives of teachers primarily encompass communal themes, whereas the narratives of entrepreneurial leaders focus predominantly on agentic topics. However, both groups were equally adept at integrating the two motivational aspects. The findings offer empirical support for the notion that generativity may be organized based on varying motivations. Both agentic and communal motivations may indicate elevated aspirations for generativity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47759,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","volume":"41 4","pages":"Article 101436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522125000417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of agentic and communal motivations, along with the resultant potential to be generative, constitutes not merely a suggestion for present-day business actors, but a duty. Through such integration, these actors are able not only to enhance the profitability of their businesses, but also to advance the welfare of their workforce and contribute to the improvement of society. The present studies aim to demonstrate that individuals in different occupations can have a different motivational composition behind their generative aspirations. We examined this using mixed methods among three groups: entrepreneur leaders, teachers, and control groups. We used the Loyola Generativity Scale (N = 117) and life story interviews (N = 90), in which we coded themes of agency and communion, and also included the economic indicators of the companies in an exploratory manner. The control group exhibits the lowest level of generativity, whereas both teachers and entrepreneurs demonstrate higher levels of generativity. Moreover, the life narratives of teachers primarily encompass communal themes, whereas the narratives of entrepreneurial leaders focus predominantly on agentic topics. However, both groups were equally adept at integrating the two motivational aspects. The findings offer empirical support for the notion that generativity may be organized based on varying motivations. Both agentic and communal motivations may indicate elevated aspirations for generativity.
不同的生育方式。探索创业领袖生活故事中生成性背后的动机结构
代理动机和公共动机的整合,以及由此产生的产生性潜力,不仅构成了对当今商业行为者的建议,而且构成了一种责任。通过这种整合,这些参与者不仅可以提高业务的盈利能力,还可以提高员工的福利,为社会的改善做出贡献。本研究旨在证明不同职业的个体在其生成性愿望背后可能有不同的动机构成。我们使用混合方法对三组进行了检验:企业家领导、教师和对照组。我们使用洛约拉生成量表(N = 117)和生活故事访谈(N = 90),其中我们编码了代理和共融的主题,并以探索性的方式纳入了公司的经济指标。控制组表现出最低水平的生成,而教师和企业家都表现出较高水平的生成。此外,教师的生活叙述主要包含公共主题,而企业家领袖的叙述主要关注代理主题。然而,两组人在整合两种动机方面同样熟练。这些发现为“创造性可能是基于不同的动机而组织起来的”这一概念提供了实证支持。个人动机和集体动机都可能表明对创造性的渴望有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Management (SJM) provides an international forum for innovative and carefully crafted research on different aspects of management. We promote dialogue and new thinking around theory and practice, based on conceptual creativity, reasoned reflexivity and contextual awareness. We have a passion for empirical inquiry. We promote constructive dialogue among researchers as well as between researchers and practitioners. We encourage new approaches to the study of management and we aim to foster new thinking around management theory and practice. We publish original empirical and theoretical material, which contributes to understanding management in private and public organizations. Full-length articles and book reviews form the core of the journal, but focused discussion-type texts (around 3.000-5.000 words), empirically or theoretically oriented, can also be considered for publication. The Scandinavian Journal of Management is open to different research approaches in terms of methodology and epistemology. We are open to different fields of management application, but narrow technical discussions relevant only to specific sub-fields will not be given priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书