Reasoning bureaucracy in professional organisations: Enabling conditions for professional and bureaucratic values to merge in hospitals

IF 2.5 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Scandinavian Journal of Management Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-19 DOI:10.1016/j.scaman.2025.101435
Thim Prætorius , Peter Hasle
{"title":"Reasoning bureaucracy in professional organisations: Enabling conditions for professional and bureaucratic values to merge in hospitals","authors":"Thim Prætorius ,&nbsp;Peter Hasle","doi":"10.1016/j.scaman.2025.101435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bureaucratic values are routinely believed to clash with professional values in professional organisations, and bureaucratisation is equated with being a top-down phenomenon. In contrast, this article contributes to theory on bureaucracy by analysing hospital departments where frontline professionals have actively implemented bureaucratic elements, thereby limiting their individual professional autonomy. For this type of frontline bureaucracy to take place, we identify two enabling conditions for bureaucratic and professional values to merge: healthcare professionals perceive the bureaucratic element as appropriate (make clinical sense, serve a specific end and involve key stakeholders) and effective (improve care coordination and support work relations). Our analysis shows that frontline professionals implement the bureaucratic elements to build a scaffold for collaboration. This type of bottom-up, micro-level bureaucracy aligns and breaks with a top-down, macro-level understanding of bureaucracy. Our study has theoretical implications for the understanding of hybrid bureaucracy in professional organisations and holds practical insights for how frontline professionals can simultaneously harness bureaucratic and professional values.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47759,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","volume":"41 4","pages":"Article 101435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522125000405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bureaucratic values are routinely believed to clash with professional values in professional organisations, and bureaucratisation is equated with being a top-down phenomenon. In contrast, this article contributes to theory on bureaucracy by analysing hospital departments where frontline professionals have actively implemented bureaucratic elements, thereby limiting their individual professional autonomy. For this type of frontline bureaucracy to take place, we identify two enabling conditions for bureaucratic and professional values to merge: healthcare professionals perceive the bureaucratic element as appropriate (make clinical sense, serve a specific end and involve key stakeholders) and effective (improve care coordination and support work relations). Our analysis shows that frontline professionals implement the bureaucratic elements to build a scaffold for collaboration. This type of bottom-up, micro-level bureaucracy aligns and breaks with a top-down, macro-level understanding of bureaucracy. Our study has theoretical implications for the understanding of hybrid bureaucracy in professional organisations and holds practical insights for how frontline professionals can simultaneously harness bureaucratic and professional values.
专业组织中的官僚主义推理:医院中专业价值观与官僚价值观融合的有利条件
官僚价值观通常被认为与专业组织中的专业价值观相冲突,官僚化被等同于一种自上而下的现象。相比之下,本文通过分析一线专业人员积极实施官僚主义因素从而限制其个人专业自主权的医院部门来贡献官僚主义理论。为了实现这种类型的一线官僚主义,我们确定了官僚主义和专业价值观融合的两个有利条件:医疗保健专业人员认为官僚主义元素是适当的(具有临床意义,服务于特定目的并涉及关键利益相关者)和有效的(改善护理协调和支持工作关系)。我们的分析显示,一线专业人员执行官僚主义元素,以建立合作的框架。这种自下而上的、微观层面的官僚主义与自上而下的、宏观层面的官僚主义理解是一致的,并且是打破的。我们的研究对理解专业组织中的混合型官僚主义具有理论意义,并为一线专业人员如何同时利用官僚主义和专业价值观提供了实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Management (SJM) provides an international forum for innovative and carefully crafted research on different aspects of management. We promote dialogue and new thinking around theory and practice, based on conceptual creativity, reasoned reflexivity and contextual awareness. We have a passion for empirical inquiry. We promote constructive dialogue among researchers as well as between researchers and practitioners. We encourage new approaches to the study of management and we aim to foster new thinking around management theory and practice. We publish original empirical and theoretical material, which contributes to understanding management in private and public organizations. Full-length articles and book reviews form the core of the journal, but focused discussion-type texts (around 3.000-5.000 words), empirically or theoretically oriented, can also be considered for publication. The Scandinavian Journal of Management is open to different research approaches in terms of methodology and epistemology. We are open to different fields of management application, but narrow technical discussions relevant only to specific sub-fields will not be given priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书