{"title":"Reasoning bureaucracy in professional organisations: Enabling conditions for professional and bureaucratic values to merge in hospitals","authors":"Thim Prætorius , Peter Hasle","doi":"10.1016/j.scaman.2025.101435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bureaucratic values are routinely believed to clash with professional values in professional organisations, and bureaucratisation is equated with being a top-down phenomenon. In contrast, this article contributes to theory on bureaucracy by analysing hospital departments where frontline professionals have actively implemented bureaucratic elements, thereby limiting their individual professional autonomy. For this type of frontline bureaucracy to take place, we identify two enabling conditions for bureaucratic and professional values to merge: healthcare professionals perceive the bureaucratic element as appropriate (make clinical sense, serve a specific end and involve key stakeholders) and effective (improve care coordination and support work relations). Our analysis shows that frontline professionals implement the bureaucratic elements to build a scaffold for collaboration. This type of bottom-up, micro-level bureaucracy aligns and breaks with a top-down, macro-level understanding of bureaucracy. Our study has theoretical implications for the understanding of hybrid bureaucracy in professional organisations and holds practical insights for how frontline professionals can simultaneously harness bureaucratic and professional values.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47759,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","volume":"41 4","pages":"Article 101435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522125000405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bureaucratic values are routinely believed to clash with professional values in professional organisations, and bureaucratisation is equated with being a top-down phenomenon. In contrast, this article contributes to theory on bureaucracy by analysing hospital departments where frontline professionals have actively implemented bureaucratic elements, thereby limiting their individual professional autonomy. For this type of frontline bureaucracy to take place, we identify two enabling conditions for bureaucratic and professional values to merge: healthcare professionals perceive the bureaucratic element as appropriate (make clinical sense, serve a specific end and involve key stakeholders) and effective (improve care coordination and support work relations). Our analysis shows that frontline professionals implement the bureaucratic elements to build a scaffold for collaboration. This type of bottom-up, micro-level bureaucracy aligns and breaks with a top-down, macro-level understanding of bureaucracy. Our study has theoretical implications for the understanding of hybrid bureaucracy in professional organisations and holds practical insights for how frontline professionals can simultaneously harness bureaucratic and professional values.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Management (SJM) provides an international forum for innovative and carefully crafted research on different aspects of management. We promote dialogue and new thinking around theory and practice, based on conceptual creativity, reasoned reflexivity and contextual awareness. We have a passion for empirical inquiry. We promote constructive dialogue among researchers as well as between researchers and practitioners. We encourage new approaches to the study of management and we aim to foster new thinking around management theory and practice. We publish original empirical and theoretical material, which contributes to understanding management in private and public organizations. Full-length articles and book reviews form the core of the journal, but focused discussion-type texts (around 3.000-5.000 words), empirically or theoretically oriented, can also be considered for publication. The Scandinavian Journal of Management is open to different research approaches in terms of methodology and epistemology. We are open to different fields of management application, but narrow technical discussions relevant only to specific sub-fields will not be given priority.