{"title":"Understanding power change: The role of assimilation and contrast in the effect of structural power change on prosocial behavior","authors":"Hanna Kalmanovich-Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.scaman.2025.101434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social power is inherently dynamic, characterized by frequent shifts throughout individuals’ careers. This paper explores the effects of these structural power shifts—specifically power gain and power loss—on individuals' psychological sense of power and the prosocial consequences of holding power. Integrating temporal comparison theory with social power research, we demonstrate that structural power changes influence prosocial behavior beyond immediate power levels. Individuals' reactions to power change depends on their engagement in contrast versus assimilation judgments. Specifically, power loss diminishes individuals' psychological sense of power in assimilation judgements, while it enhances it in contrast judgments. Conversely, the effects of power gain on psychological sense of power are more nuanced. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how power change influence prosocial behavior, emphasizing the role of temporal comparisons in shaping responses to power change. This research offers theoretical insights into the complexities of power change and suggests implications for organizational strategies aimed at effectively managing and leveraging power transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47759,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","volume":"41 4","pages":"Article 101434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522125000399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Social power is inherently dynamic, characterized by frequent shifts throughout individuals’ careers. This paper explores the effects of these structural power shifts—specifically power gain and power loss—on individuals' psychological sense of power and the prosocial consequences of holding power. Integrating temporal comparison theory with social power research, we demonstrate that structural power changes influence prosocial behavior beyond immediate power levels. Individuals' reactions to power change depends on their engagement in contrast versus assimilation judgments. Specifically, power loss diminishes individuals' psychological sense of power in assimilation judgements, while it enhances it in contrast judgments. Conversely, the effects of power gain on psychological sense of power are more nuanced. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how power change influence prosocial behavior, emphasizing the role of temporal comparisons in shaping responses to power change. This research offers theoretical insights into the complexities of power change and suggests implications for organizational strategies aimed at effectively managing and leveraging power transitions.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Management (SJM) provides an international forum for innovative and carefully crafted research on different aspects of management. We promote dialogue and new thinking around theory and practice, based on conceptual creativity, reasoned reflexivity and contextual awareness. We have a passion for empirical inquiry. We promote constructive dialogue among researchers as well as between researchers and practitioners. We encourage new approaches to the study of management and we aim to foster new thinking around management theory and practice. We publish original empirical and theoretical material, which contributes to understanding management in private and public organizations. Full-length articles and book reviews form the core of the journal, but focused discussion-type texts (around 3.000-5.000 words), empirically or theoretically oriented, can also be considered for publication. The Scandinavian Journal of Management is open to different research approaches in terms of methodology and epistemology. We are open to different fields of management application, but narrow technical discussions relevant only to specific sub-fields will not be given priority.