Understanding power change: The role of assimilation and contrast in the effect of structural power change on prosocial behavior

IF 2.5 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Scandinavian Journal of Management Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.scaman.2025.101434
Hanna Kalmanovich-Cohen
{"title":"Understanding power change: The role of assimilation and contrast in the effect of structural power change on prosocial behavior","authors":"Hanna Kalmanovich-Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.scaman.2025.101434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social power is inherently dynamic, characterized by frequent shifts throughout individuals’ careers. This paper explores the effects of these structural power shifts—specifically power gain and power loss—on individuals' psychological sense of power and the prosocial consequences of holding power. Integrating temporal comparison theory with social power research, we demonstrate that structural power changes influence prosocial behavior beyond immediate power levels. Individuals' reactions to power change depends on their engagement in contrast versus assimilation judgments. Specifically, power loss diminishes individuals' psychological sense of power in assimilation judgements, while it enhances it in contrast judgments. Conversely, the effects of power gain on psychological sense of power are more nuanced. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how power change influence prosocial behavior, emphasizing the role of temporal comparisons in shaping responses to power change. This research offers theoretical insights into the complexities of power change and suggests implications for organizational strategies aimed at effectively managing and leveraging power transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47759,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","volume":"41 4","pages":"Article 101434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522125000399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social power is inherently dynamic, characterized by frequent shifts throughout individuals’ careers. This paper explores the effects of these structural power shifts—specifically power gain and power loss—on individuals' psychological sense of power and the prosocial consequences of holding power. Integrating temporal comparison theory with social power research, we demonstrate that structural power changes influence prosocial behavior beyond immediate power levels. Individuals' reactions to power change depends on their engagement in contrast versus assimilation judgments. Specifically, power loss diminishes individuals' psychological sense of power in assimilation judgements, while it enhances it in contrast judgments. Conversely, the effects of power gain on psychological sense of power are more nuanced. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how power change influence prosocial behavior, emphasizing the role of temporal comparisons in shaping responses to power change. This research offers theoretical insights into the complexities of power change and suggests implications for organizational strategies aimed at effectively managing and leveraging power transitions.
理解权力变化:同化与对比在结构性权力变化对亲社会行为的影响中的作用
社会权力本质上是动态的,其特点是在个人的职业生涯中经常发生变化。本文探讨了这些结构性权力转移——特别是权力获得和权力丧失——对个体心理权力感和持有权力的亲社会后果的影响。本文将时间比较理论与社会权力研究相结合,论证了权力结构变化对亲社会行为的影响超越了直接权力层面。个人对权力变化的反应取决于他们的参与与同化判断的对比。具体而言,权力丧失在同化判断中削弱了个体的心理权力感,而在对比判断中增强了个体的心理权力感。相反,权力获得对心理权力感的影响则更为微妙。我们的研究结果有助于更深入地理解权力变化如何影响亲社会行为,强调时间比较在形成对权力变化的反应中的作用。本研究为权力变迁的复杂性提供了理论见解,并对旨在有效管理和利用权力变迁的组织战略提出了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Management (SJM) provides an international forum for innovative and carefully crafted research on different aspects of management. We promote dialogue and new thinking around theory and practice, based on conceptual creativity, reasoned reflexivity and contextual awareness. We have a passion for empirical inquiry. We promote constructive dialogue among researchers as well as between researchers and practitioners. We encourage new approaches to the study of management and we aim to foster new thinking around management theory and practice. We publish original empirical and theoretical material, which contributes to understanding management in private and public organizations. Full-length articles and book reviews form the core of the journal, but focused discussion-type texts (around 3.000-5.000 words), empirically or theoretically oriented, can also be considered for publication. The Scandinavian Journal of Management is open to different research approaches in terms of methodology and epistemology. We are open to different fields of management application, but narrow technical discussions relevant only to specific sub-fields will not be given priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书