Criminal record expungement and resocialisation: German experience and reflections for China

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Luyuan Bai
{"title":"Criminal record expungement and resocialisation: German experience and reflections for China","authors":"Luyuan Bai","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlcj.2025.100808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Criminal record expungement is essential to the resocialisation of former offenders, as it removes long-term barriers to education, employment, and equal civic participation. Germany offers one of the most mature models in this regard, grounded in a historical, constitutional and legislative commitment to resocialisation, and operationalised through age-differentiated treatment, a phased sealing-expungement system, a nuanced balance of public interests and individual reintegration, and strong safeguards for privacy and data protection. Drawing on these insights and the longstanding jurisprudential ties between Germany and China, the paper reflects on China's experience with juvenile record sealing and record inquiry mechanisms. Despite their contributions, the practices reveal structural weaknesses—marked by fragmentation, risk-driven orientation and weak legal effect—while the application of collateral consequences across employment, education and social welfare continues to undermine resocialisation. Against the backdrop of rising minor offences and large numbers of offenders re-entering society, this paper argues that a rights-oriented sealing regime is both normatively necessary and institutionally feasible. It rests on embedding resocialisation as a guiding principle, structuring the regime through staged legislative pathways and phased design, and reinforcing legal effects through differentiated consequences and procedural safeguards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46026,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 100808"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756061625000849","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Criminal record expungement is essential to the resocialisation of former offenders, as it removes long-term barriers to education, employment, and equal civic participation. Germany offers one of the most mature models in this regard, grounded in a historical, constitutional and legislative commitment to resocialisation, and operationalised through age-differentiated treatment, a phased sealing-expungement system, a nuanced balance of public interests and individual reintegration, and strong safeguards for privacy and data protection. Drawing on these insights and the longstanding jurisprudential ties between Germany and China, the paper reflects on China's experience with juvenile record sealing and record inquiry mechanisms. Despite their contributions, the practices reveal structural weaknesses—marked by fragmentation, risk-driven orientation and weak legal effect—while the application of collateral consequences across employment, education and social welfare continues to undermine resocialisation. Against the backdrop of rising minor offences and large numbers of offenders re-entering society, this paper argues that a rights-oriented sealing regime is both normatively necessary and institutionally feasible. It rests on embedding resocialisation as a guiding principle, structuring the regime through staged legislative pathways and phased design, and reinforcing legal effects through differentiated consequences and procedural safeguards.
犯罪记录的清除与再社会化:德国的经验与对中国的反思
清除犯罪记录对于前罪犯重新融入社会至关重要,因为它消除了教育、就业和平等公民参与方面的长期障碍。在这方面,德国提供了最成熟的模式之一,其基础是对再社会化的历史、宪法和立法承诺,并通过年龄差别待遇、分阶段密封-清除制度、公共利益和个人重返社会的微妙平衡,以及对隐私和数据保护的强有力保障来实施。基于这些见解和中德两国长期以来的法理渊源,本文反思了中国在未成年人档案封存和档案查询机制方面的经验。尽管他们做出了贡献,但实践暴露出结构性弱点——以碎片化、风险驱动导向和薄弱的法律效力为特征——而在就业、教育和社会福利领域的附带后果的应用继续破坏再社会化。在未成年人犯罪上升和大量罪犯重返社会的背景下,本文认为以权利为导向的封印制度在规范上是必要的,在制度上也是可行的。它依赖于将再社会化作为指导原则,通过分阶段立法途径和分阶段设计构建制度,并通过区别后果和程序保障加强法律效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice is an international and fully peer reviewed journal which welcomes high quality, theoretically informed papers on a wide range of fields linked to criminological research and analysis. It invites submissions relating to: Studies of crime and interpretations of forms and dimensions of criminality; Analyses of criminological debates and contested theoretical frameworks of criminological analysis; Research and analysis of criminal justice and penal policy and practices; Research and analysis of policing policies and policing forms and practices. We particularly welcome submissions relating to more recent and emerging areas of criminological enquiry including cyber-enabled crime, fraud-related crime, terrorism and hate crime.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书