Current expected credit loss model adoption

IF 4.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Aurelius Aaron, Xiaoli Jia, Jeffrey Ng, Janus Jian Zhang
{"title":"Current expected credit loss model adoption","authors":"Aurelius Aaron,&nbsp;Xiaoli Jia,&nbsp;Jeffrey Ng,&nbsp;Janus Jian Zhang","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.13078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The mandatory switch from the incurred loss model to the more forward-looking current expected credit loss (CECL) model was originally scheduled to begin in 2020. However, when the COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, US regulators made the switch voluntary. Our study investigates how banks' exposure to the pandemic affects their decision to adopt CECL as well as adopting banks' pandemic-era pattern of loan loss provisions. First, consistent with pandemic-driven economic uncertainty reducing banks' willingness to adopt the new model, we find a negative association between banks' pandemic exposure and their CECL adoption. This association is more pronounced for banks with more lending opportunities, more lending competition, and worse loan quality. Second, compared with non-adopters, CECL adopters report more loan loss provisions during the pandemic's early period, and less or even negative loan loss provisions during the late period. The latter scenario reflects a reversal of earlier loan loss reserves and is more pronounced for banks with more exposure to states with a higher level of vaccination, consistent with banks having a more positive economic outlook because of improving pandemic conditions. Overall, our study offers useful insights into the adoption and implementation of accounting standards during periods of economic uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":10595,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Accounting Research","volume":"42 4","pages":"2915-2948"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1911-3846.13078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mandatory switch from the incurred loss model to the more forward-looking current expected credit loss (CECL) model was originally scheduled to begin in 2020. However, when the COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, US regulators made the switch voluntary. Our study investigates how banks' exposure to the pandemic affects their decision to adopt CECL as well as adopting banks' pandemic-era pattern of loan loss provisions. First, consistent with pandemic-driven economic uncertainty reducing banks' willingness to adopt the new model, we find a negative association between banks' pandemic exposure and their CECL adoption. This association is more pronounced for banks with more lending opportunities, more lending competition, and worse loan quality. Second, compared with non-adopters, CECL adopters report more loan loss provisions during the pandemic's early period, and less or even negative loan loss provisions during the late period. The latter scenario reflects a reversal of earlier loan loss reserves and is more pronounced for banks with more exposure to states with a higher level of vaccination, consistent with banks having a more positive economic outlook because of improving pandemic conditions. Overall, our study offers useful insights into the adoption and implementation of accounting standards during periods of economic uncertainty.

采用当前预期信用损失模型
从已发生损失模型到更具前瞻性的当前预期信用损失(CECL)模型的强制性转换原定于2020年开始。然而,当2019冠状病毒病大流行于2020年初开始时,美国监管机构自愿做出了这一转变。我们的研究调查了银行对大流行的敞口如何影响他们采用CECL的决定,以及采用银行大流行时期的贷款损失拨备模式。首先,与流行病驱动的经济不确定性降低了银行采用新模型的意愿一致,我们发现银行的流行病风险敞口与其采用CECL之间存在负相关关系。对于贷款机会更多、贷款竞争更激烈、贷款质量更差的银行来说,这种关联更为明显。其次,与未采用CECL的国家相比,采用CECL的国家在大流行早期报告的贷款损失拨备更多,而在后期报告的贷款损失拨备更少,甚至为负。后一种情况反映了早先贷款损失准备金的逆转,对于那些在疫苗接种水平较高的国家有更多风险敞口的银行来说,这种情况更为明显,这与由于大流行病条件改善而对经济前景持更积极看法的银行相一致。总的来说,我们的研究为经济不确定时期会计准则的采用和实施提供了有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) is the premiere research journal of the Canadian Academic Accounting Association, which publishes leading- edge research that contributes to our understanding of all aspects of accounting"s role within organizations, markets or society. Canadian based, increasingly global in scope, CAR seeks to reflect the geographical and intellectual diversity in accounting research. To accomplish this, CAR will continue to publish in its traditional areas of excellence, while seeking to more fully represent other research streams in its pages, so as to continue and expand its tradition of excellence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书