Flattery and The Misanthrope

0 ANTHROPOLOGY
Sociology Lens Pub Date : 2025-10-29 DOI:10.1111/johs.70020
Bülent Diken, Elif Akçalı, Defne Tüzün
{"title":"Flattery and The Misanthrope","authors":"Bülent Diken,&nbsp;Elif Akçalı,&nbsp;Defne Tüzün","doi":"10.1111/johs.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Molière's Alceste is often discussed with reference to his misanthropic personality, but what he aspires to doing, truth-telling, has received relatively less attention. This is curious especially if we consider that Alceste defines flattery, the opposite of truth-telling, as his main adversary. Indeed, it is Alceste's hatred of flattery that explains his misanthropy, not the other way around. We will first discuss the significance of flattery. Then, we trace the consequences of this idea in the play drawing on Aristophanes, Plato, and Aristotle where they define flattery as a relation to untruth and in opposition to friendship. In Plato's <i>Gorgias</i>, however, a second sense of flattery transpires: distorting ideas and practices through instrumental use. We ask what a reflection on flattery in these two interrelated senses can contribute to our understanding of Molière's comedy. What frames our discussion is the relation between Alceste and Philinte (as a stand-in for the social), on the one hand, and the relation between Alceste and Célimène (as a stand-in for seduction) on the other. Alceste cuts an abject figure in relation to both Philinte and Célimène. We end with a discussion of how Alceste can, for all his abjection, continue to fascinate us.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":"38 4","pages":"383-391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Lens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/johs.70020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Molière's Alceste is often discussed with reference to his misanthropic personality, but what he aspires to doing, truth-telling, has received relatively less attention. This is curious especially if we consider that Alceste defines flattery, the opposite of truth-telling, as his main adversary. Indeed, it is Alceste's hatred of flattery that explains his misanthropy, not the other way around. We will first discuss the significance of flattery. Then, we trace the consequences of this idea in the play drawing on Aristophanes, Plato, and Aristotle where they define flattery as a relation to untruth and in opposition to friendship. In Plato's Gorgias, however, a second sense of flattery transpires: distorting ideas and practices through instrumental use. We ask what a reflection on flattery in these two interrelated senses can contribute to our understanding of Molière's comedy. What frames our discussion is the relation between Alceste and Philinte (as a stand-in for the social), on the one hand, and the relation between Alceste and Célimène (as a stand-in for seduction) on the other. Alceste cuts an abject figure in relation to both Philinte and Célimène. We end with a discussion of how Alceste can, for all his abjection, continue to fascinate us.

奉承和厌世者
人们在讨论莫里埃尔笔下的阿尔塞斯特时,经常提到他厌世的性格,但他渴望做的事情——讲真话——却相对较少受到关注。这很奇怪,尤其是当我们考虑到阿尔塞斯特将阿谀奉承——讲真话的对立面——定义为他的主要对手时。事实上,正是阿尔塞斯特对奉承的憎恨解释了他的厌世,而不是反过来。我们将首先讨论奉承的重要性。然后,我们追溯这一观点在阿里斯托芬,柏拉图和亚里士多德的戏剧中的后果,他们将奉承定义为与不诚实的关系,与友谊相对立。然而,在柏拉图的《戈尔吉亚篇》中,第二种奉承的感觉出现了:通过工具的使用扭曲了思想和实践。我们要问的是,从这两种相互关联的意义上对奉承的反思,对我们理解莫里埃尔的喜剧有什么帮助。我们讨论的框架一方面是阿尔赛斯特和菲利特(作为社会的代表)之间的关系,另一方面是阿尔赛斯特和csamim(作为诱惑的代表)之间的关系。阿尔赛斯特在Philinte和cacimlimine面前都显得很卑微。最后,我们讨论了阿尔塞斯特虽然落魄,但如何能继续吸引我们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书