Continuities and Changes: A Trend Analysis of Historical Sociology in the 21st Century

0 ANTHROPOLOGY
Sociology Lens Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI:10.1111/johs.70014
Zhengxin Li, Amir Karimi
{"title":"Continuities and Changes: A Trend Analysis of Historical Sociology in the 21st Century","authors":"Zhengxin Li,&nbsp;Amir Karimi","doi":"10.1111/johs.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of historical sociology from 2005 to 2025, identifying key trends and challenges within the discipline. Despite a modest annual growth rate of 10.59% and increased publication rates, a significant decline in average citations per document raises concerns about the field's impact and recognition. The authorship landscape is characterized by a predominance of single-authored works and limited international collaboration, predominantly within national contexts, with the USA and UK as leading contributors. Thematic evolution indicates a shift toward emerging topics, such as political sociology and nationalism, whereas traditional concepts appear to be waning. Influential articles addressing critical themes, such as international relations and the sociology of knowledge, highlight ongoing and relevant discussions. A notable transition from a European-centric focus to a broader examination of Asian, Oceanian, and African contexts presents new research opportunities, particularly in digital humanities and education. Methodological advancements, including quantitative methodologies and synthesis analysis techniques, enhance the discipline's adaptability. However, the study's reliance on the Scopus database limits its findings, suggesting that future research should incorporate additional databases for a more comprehensive perspective. The analysis also indicates areas for further exploration, particularly regarding the roles of countries, institutions, journals, and authors in shaping the field.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":"38 4","pages":"324-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Lens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/johs.70014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of historical sociology from 2005 to 2025, identifying key trends and challenges within the discipline. Despite a modest annual growth rate of 10.59% and increased publication rates, a significant decline in average citations per document raises concerns about the field's impact and recognition. The authorship landscape is characterized by a predominance of single-authored works and limited international collaboration, predominantly within national contexts, with the USA and UK as leading contributors. Thematic evolution indicates a shift toward emerging topics, such as political sociology and nationalism, whereas traditional concepts appear to be waning. Influential articles addressing critical themes, such as international relations and the sociology of knowledge, highlight ongoing and relevant discussions. A notable transition from a European-centric focus to a broader examination of Asian, Oceanian, and African contexts presents new research opportunities, particularly in digital humanities and education. Methodological advancements, including quantitative methodologies and synthesis analysis techniques, enhance the discipline's adaptability. However, the study's reliance on the Scopus database limits its findings, suggesting that future research should incorporate additional databases for a more comprehensive perspective. The analysis also indicates areas for further exploration, particularly regarding the roles of countries, institutions, journals, and authors in shaping the field.

延续与变迁:21世纪历史社会学的趋势分析
本文对2005年至2025年的历史社会学进行了全面分析,指出了该学科的主要趋势和挑战。尽管年增长率为10.59%,发表率也有所提高,但每篇论文的平均引用量显著下降,引发了人们对该领域影响力和认可度的担忧。作者身份格局的特点是单一作者的作品占主导地位,国际合作有限,主要是在国家背景下,美国和英国是主要贡献者。主题演变表明了向新兴主题的转变,如政治社会学和民族主义,而传统概念似乎正在减弱。涉及国际关系和知识社会学等关键主题的有影响力的文章突出了正在进行的相关讨论。从以欧洲为中心到更广泛地考察亚洲、大洋洲和非洲背景的显著转变,提供了新的研究机会,特别是在数字人文和教育方面。方法上的进步,包括定量方法和综合分析技术,增强了学科的适应性。然而,这项研究对Scopus数据库的依赖限制了它的发现,这表明未来的研究应该纳入更多的数据库,以获得更全面的视角。分析还指出了进一步探索的领域,特别是关于国家、机构、期刊和作者在塑造该领域中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书