Trust in buyer-supplier new product development teams increases Advice-Seeking—But do birds of a feather flock together?

IF 7.4 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Craig R. Carter , Lutz Kaufmann , Dawn DeLay , Rohan Korde
{"title":"Trust in buyer-supplier new product development teams increases Advice-Seeking—But do birds of a feather flock together?","authors":"Craig R. Carter ,&nbsp;Lutz Kaufmann ,&nbsp;Dawn DeLay ,&nbsp;Rohan Korde","doi":"10.1016/j.pursup.2025.101035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine team dynamics in buyer-supplier new product development<span> (NPD) projects over time, using McGrath's (1984) Input-Process-Output (IPO) model as our foundation. In this framework, a team member's trust in their NPD team and the team's composition function as inputs, while advice-seeking represents the process. To deepen our theorization and analysis, we integrate a social network perspective: trust-in-team is treated as an individual attribute, team composition—defined by organizational and functional similarity—is viewed through the lens of homophily, and advice-seeking is conceptualized as a network tie. We collected data from each member of three distinct NPD project teams at three key stages (NPD stage gates), ensuring a comprehensive analysis that spans both a focal buying organization and a strategic supplier. Using stochastic actor-oriented modeling (SAOM), we uncover an important yet often overlooked insight: changes in an individual team member's trust in their team lead to corresponding changes in advice-seeking behavior. However, team members continue to favor seeking advice from individuals within their own organization across each of the project stages. This tendency suggests that NPD team members may be missing valuable opportunities to seek advice from team members outside of their organization who could provide fresh perspectives and diverse expertise.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":47950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management","volume":"31 5","pages":"Article 101035"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1478409225000445","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine team dynamics in buyer-supplier new product development (NPD) projects over time, using McGrath's (1984) Input-Process-Output (IPO) model as our foundation. In this framework, a team member's trust in their NPD team and the team's composition function as inputs, while advice-seeking represents the process. To deepen our theorization and analysis, we integrate a social network perspective: trust-in-team is treated as an individual attribute, team composition—defined by organizational and functional similarity—is viewed through the lens of homophily, and advice-seeking is conceptualized as a network tie. We collected data from each member of three distinct NPD project teams at three key stages (NPD stage gates), ensuring a comprehensive analysis that spans both a focal buying organization and a strategic supplier. Using stochastic actor-oriented modeling (SAOM), we uncover an important yet often overlooked insight: changes in an individual team member's trust in their team lead to corresponding changes in advice-seeking behavior. However, team members continue to favor seeking advice from individuals within their own organization across each of the project stages. This tendency suggests that NPD team members may be missing valuable opportunities to seek advice from team members outside of their organization who could provide fresh perspectives and diverse expertise.
对买方和供应商新产品开发团队的信任增加了咨询——但是物以类聚吗?
我们使用McGrath(1984)的投入-过程-产出(IPO)模型作为我们的基础,研究了买方-供应商新产品开发(NPD)项目中随时间变化的团队动态。在这个框架中,团队成员对其NPD团队的信任和团队构成作为输入,而寻求建议则代表过程。为了深化我们的理论和分析,我们整合了社会网络视角:团队信任被视为个人属性,团队组成——由组织和功能相似性定义——通过同质性的视角来看待,寻求建议被概念化为网络联系。我们在三个关键阶段(NPD阶段门)从三个不同的NPD项目团队的每个成员那里收集数据,确保对重点采购组织和战略供应商进行全面分析。使用随机因素导向模型(SAOM),我们发现了一个重要但经常被忽视的洞察力:团队成员对团队信任的变化会导致咨询行为的相应变化。然而,在每个项目阶段,团队成员仍然倾向于从他们自己组织中的个人那里寻求建议。这种趋势表明,NPD团队成员可能会错过从组织外的团队成员那里寻求建议的宝贵机会,这些团队成员可以提供新鲜的观点和多样化的专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
18.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management is to publish original, high-quality research within the field of purchasing and supply management (PSM). Articles should have a significant impact on PSM theory and practice. The Journal ensures that high quality research is collected and disseminated widely to both academics and practitioners, and provides a forum for debate. It covers all subjects relating to the purchase and supply of goods and services in industry, commerce, local, national, and regional government, health and transportation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书