End-to-end interactive joint model: Clause-phrase multi-task learning for suicidal ideation cause extraction (SICE) in Chinese Weibo text

IF 3.5 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Pattern Recognition Letters Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.patrec.2025.11.036
Qi Fu , Yuhao Zhang , Dexi Liu , Liyuan Zhang , Wenzhong Peng
{"title":"End-to-end interactive joint model: Clause-phrase multi-task learning for suicidal ideation cause extraction (SICE) in Chinese Weibo text","authors":"Qi Fu ,&nbsp;Yuhao Zhang ,&nbsp;Dexi Liu ,&nbsp;Liyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenzhong Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.patrec.2025.11.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Suicide prevention has been a critical research focus for governments, mental health professionals, and social work researchers worldwide. With the increasing number of individuals seeking help through social networks and psychological counseling platforms, timely analysis of the causes of Suicidal Ideation (SI) in help-seeking texts can provide scientific evidence and actionable insights for suicide prevention efforts. Existing approaches face challenges: (i) SIC clause extraction is coarse-grained and thus imprecise in localization; (ii) SIC phrase extraction is more precise but inherently harder. To address this, we propose an end-to-end interactive joint model (EIJM) based on a clause-phrase multi-task learning (MTL) framework, where SIC phrase extraction serves as the main task and SIC clause extraction as the auxiliary task. By leveraging joint learning, EIJM enhances extraction accuracy while reducing task difficulty. Experimental results demonstrate that EIJM outperforms the two-stage independent multi-task (2SIM) approach across multiple evaluation metrics. Specifically, in the SIC phrase extraction task, EIJM achieves a 1.1 % improvement in recall over 2SIM without compromising precision. In the SIC clause extraction task, EIJM improves precision, recall, and F1-score by 0.4 %, 0.9 %, and 0.7 %, respectively. Furthermore, in 2SIM, incorporating clause-level representations from the auxiliary task into the main task enhances local matching and fuzzy matching metrics, with the Fuzzy Match method improving the most by 0.9 %. However, it yielded limited improvement in exact matching performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54638,"journal":{"name":"Pattern Recognition Letters","volume":"200 ","pages":"Pages 1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pattern Recognition Letters","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167865525003927","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suicide prevention has been a critical research focus for governments, mental health professionals, and social work researchers worldwide. With the increasing number of individuals seeking help through social networks and psychological counseling platforms, timely analysis of the causes of Suicidal Ideation (SI) in help-seeking texts can provide scientific evidence and actionable insights for suicide prevention efforts. Existing approaches face challenges: (i) SIC clause extraction is coarse-grained and thus imprecise in localization; (ii) SIC phrase extraction is more precise but inherently harder. To address this, we propose an end-to-end interactive joint model (EIJM) based on a clause-phrase multi-task learning (MTL) framework, where SIC phrase extraction serves as the main task and SIC clause extraction as the auxiliary task. By leveraging joint learning, EIJM enhances extraction accuracy while reducing task difficulty. Experimental results demonstrate that EIJM outperforms the two-stage independent multi-task (2SIM) approach across multiple evaluation metrics. Specifically, in the SIC phrase extraction task, EIJM achieves a 1.1 % improvement in recall over 2SIM without compromising precision. In the SIC clause extraction task, EIJM improves precision, recall, and F1-score by 0.4 %, 0.9 %, and 0.7 %, respectively. Furthermore, in 2SIM, incorporating clause-level representations from the auxiliary task into the main task enhances local matching and fuzzy matching metrics, with the Fuzzy Match method improving the most by 0.9 %. However, it yielded limited improvement in exact matching performance.
端到端交互联合模型:中文微博文本自杀意念原因抽取的子句-短语多任务学习
自杀预防一直是世界各国政府、精神卫生专业人员和社会工作研究人员的重要研究重点。随着越来越多的人通过社交网络和心理咨询平台寻求帮助,及时分析求助文本中自杀意念(SI)的原因可以为自杀预防工作提供科学依据和可操作的见解。现有的方法面临挑战:(1)SIC子句提取是粗粒度的,因此定位不精确;(ii) SIC短语提取更精确,但本质上更困难。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一个基于子句-短语多任务学习(MTL)框架的端到端交互联合模型(EIJM),其中SIC短语提取作为主任务,SIC小句提取作为辅助任务。通过利用联合学习,EIJM提高了提取的准确性,同时降低了任务难度。实验结果表明,EIJM在多个评价指标上优于两阶段独立多任务(2SIM)方法。具体来说,在SIC短语提取任务中,EIJM在不影响精度的情况下,在2SIM的召回率上提高了1.1%。在SIC子句提取任务中,EIJM分别将准确率、召回率和f1分数提高了0.4%、0.9%和0.7%。此外,在2SIM中,将辅助任务的子句级表示合并到主任务中可以增强局部匹配和模糊匹配度量,其中模糊匹配方法的改进幅度最大,提高了0.9%。然而,它在精确匹配性能方面的改进有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pattern Recognition Letters
Pattern Recognition Letters 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
9.1 months
期刊介绍: Pattern Recognition Letters aims at rapid publication of concise articles of a broad interest in pattern recognition. Subject areas include all the current fields of interest represented by the Technical Committees of the International Association of Pattern Recognition, and other developing themes involving learning and recognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书