Real-world evidence supporting orphan drugs approvals for rare neuromuscular disorders in the European Union and the United States: Review of public assessment reports (2015–2025)

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Current Opinion in Pharmacology Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.coph.2025.102586
Beliu García-Parra , Josep M. Guiu , Mónica Povedano , Pilar Modamio
{"title":"Real-world evidence supporting orphan drugs approvals for rare neuromuscular disorders in the European Union and the United States: Review of public assessment reports (2015–2025)","authors":"Beliu García-Parra ,&nbsp;Josep M. Guiu ,&nbsp;Mónica Povedano ,&nbsp;Pilar Modamio","doi":"10.1016/j.coph.2025.102586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) are becoming essential complements to conventional clinical trials for drug assessment, particularly for rare neuromuscular disorders where small patient populations heighten outcome uncertainty. Robust RWE could reduce that uncertainty and inform regulatory decisions on orphan drugs (ODs). To review how the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have incorporated RWE into OD approvals for neuromuscular diseases from January 2015 to January 2025. We reviewed all publicly available EMA European Public Assessment Reports and FDA review packages for ODs targeting neuromuscular indications. Each document was screened for mention of RWD sources and by the regulatory weight assigned to the resulting RWE. We identified 14 OD approvals by the EMA and 13 by the FDA, with greater use of RWE by the FDA. Indications comprised spinal muscular atrophy (3/3 EMA/FDA), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (1/3), amyloid neuropathies (2/2), Friedreich ataxia (1/1), Lambert–Eaton syndrome (1/1), myasthenia gravis (2/2), myotonic disorders (1/0), and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (2/1). Among 18 evaluable dossiers, clinical outcome assessments (COA) were reported as follows: patient-reported outcomes - 39.1%, clinician-reported outcomes - 34.7%, observer-reported outcomes - 13.1 %, and performance outcomes - 13.1%. Only tofersen incorporated all COA types. The use of RWE for the evaluation of ODs is increasing for both the FDA and the EMA, more so for the former than for the latter. Harmonized methodological standards and transparent reporting frameworks are urgently needed to generate quality evidence that benefits stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50603,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pharmacology","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 102586"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471489225000827","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) are becoming essential complements to conventional clinical trials for drug assessment, particularly for rare neuromuscular disorders where small patient populations heighten outcome uncertainty. Robust RWE could reduce that uncertainty and inform regulatory decisions on orphan drugs (ODs). To review how the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have incorporated RWE into OD approvals for neuromuscular diseases from January 2015 to January 2025. We reviewed all publicly available EMA European Public Assessment Reports and FDA review packages for ODs targeting neuromuscular indications. Each document was screened for mention of RWD sources and by the regulatory weight assigned to the resulting RWE. We identified 14 OD approvals by the EMA and 13 by the FDA, with greater use of RWE by the FDA. Indications comprised spinal muscular atrophy (3/3 EMA/FDA), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (1/3), amyloid neuropathies (2/2), Friedreich ataxia (1/1), Lambert–Eaton syndrome (1/1), myasthenia gravis (2/2), myotonic disorders (1/0), and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (2/1). Among 18 evaluable dossiers, clinical outcome assessments (COA) were reported as follows: patient-reported outcomes - 39.1%, clinician-reported outcomes - 34.7%, observer-reported outcomes - 13.1 %, and performance outcomes - 13.1%. Only tofersen incorporated all COA types. The use of RWE for the evaluation of ODs is increasing for both the FDA and the EMA, more so for the former than for the latter. Harmonized methodological standards and transparent reporting frameworks are urgently needed to generate quality evidence that benefits stakeholders.
支持欧盟和美国罕见神经肌肉疾病孤儿药批准的真实证据:公共评估报告回顾(2015-2025)
真实世界数据(RWD)和真实世界证据(RWE)正在成为药物评估常规临床试验的重要补充,特别是对于罕见的神经肌肉疾病,其中小患者群体增加了结果的不确定性。健全的RWE可以减少这种不确定性,并为孤儿药(ODs)的监管决策提供信息。回顾欧洲药品管理局(EMA)和美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)如何将RWE纳入2015年1月至2025年1月神经肌肉疾病的OD批准。我们审查了针对神经肌肉适应症的ODs的所有公开可用的EMA欧洲公共评估报告和FDA审查包。每份文件都经过筛选,以确定RWD来源,并根据分配给最终RWE的监管权重进行筛选。我们确定了14个由EMA批准的OD和13个由FDA批准的OD, FDA更多地使用了RWE。适应症包括脊髓性肌萎缩症(3/3 EMA/FDA)、肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(1/3)、淀粉样神经病(2/2)、弗里德赖希共济失调症(1/1)、Lambert-Eaton综合征(1/1)、重症肌无力症(2/2)、肌强直性疾病(1/0)和杜氏肌营养不良症(2/1)。在18个可评估的档案中,临床结果评估(COA)的报告如下:患者报告的结果为39.1%,临床报告的结果为34.7%,观察者报告的结果为13.1%,绩效结果为13.1%。只有tofersen合并了所有COA类型。对于FDA和EMA来说,RWE用于ODs评估的使用正在增加,前者比后者更多。迫切需要统一的方法标准和透明的报告框架,以产生有利于利益攸关方的高质量证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Pharmacology (COPHAR) publishes authoritative, comprehensive, and systematic reviews. COPHAR helps specialists keep up to date with a clear and readable synthesis on current advances in pharmacology and drug discovery. Expert authors annotate the most interesting papers from the expanding volume of information published today, saving valuable time and giving the reader insight on areas of importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书