Simultaneous diversification of cover and cash crops: Short-term agronomic and soil health outcomes

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2025.110138
Rachel Wooliver , Lori A. Duncan , Jake McNeal , Tyson B. Raper , Andrew Denton , Sindhu Jagadamma
{"title":"Simultaneous diversification of cover and cash crops: Short-term agronomic and soil health outcomes","authors":"Rachel Wooliver ,&nbsp;Lori A. Duncan ,&nbsp;Jake McNeal ,&nbsp;Tyson B. Raper ,&nbsp;Andrew Denton ,&nbsp;Sindhu Jagadamma","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.110138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Positive relationships between plant diversity and ecosystem functioning are frequent in natural systems, however research on year-round plant diversification to improve agroecosystem outcomes is limited. Challenges such as lag times for soil health benefits during the early transition years of cover cropping may be compensated by increases in crop yield from cash crop rotations. To better understand management strategies that could promote agroecosystem productivity and sustainability, we explored responses of agronomic and soil multifunctionality to simultaneous winter cover crop mixes and cash crop rotation using a three-year field experiment in western Tennessee, USA. Cover crop treatments included a no cover crop control (winter fallow), single-species winter wheat (<em>Triticum aestivum</em> L.), single-species crimson clover (<em>Trifolium incarnatum</em> L.), two-species wheat-clover mix, and five-species mix of cereal rye (<em>Secale cereale</em> L.), oat (<em>Avena sativa</em> L.), clover, hairy vetch (<em>Vicia villosa</em> Roth), and radish (<em>Raphanus sativus</em> L.). Cropping systems included continuous corn (<em>Zea mays</em> L.), continuous soybean (<em>Glycine max</em> L.), corn-soybean rotation, and corn-cotton (<em>Gossypium hirsutum</em> L.)-soybean rotation. Total agronomic and soil health multifunctionality were weakly correlated across treatment combinations. The single-species clover and both mixes led to the highest agronomic multifunctionality in all cropping systems. Single-species wheat and wheat-clover mix provided the greatest cover crop biomass inputs, but both cover crops decreased overall cash crop yields (corn, cotton, and soybean scaled within crop and year) relative to the five-species mix. This result for yield was driven by year-one reductions in corn yield by averages of 2.15 and 1.74 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> in single-species wheat and wheat-clover mix cover cropped plots (respectively) compared to all other cover crop treatments. Cash crop rotation did not influence agronomic multifunctionality, although in year three, rotation with soybean increased corn yield by 1.49 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> relative to monocropped corn, and rotation with corn and cotton increased soybean yield by 0.34 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> relative to monocropped soybean. Wheat-clover mix as a cover crop increased mineral-associated organic C relative to winter fallow in the continuous soybean system, however there were no strong overall influences of cover crop or crop rotation on soil multifunctionality. Overall, our results suggest that winter cover crops can increase agronomic benefits of cash cropping systems in the southeastern United States within three years of adoption, but soil health benefits may be more difficult to detect in this short timeframe.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"399 ","pages":"Article 110138"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092500670X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Positive relationships between plant diversity and ecosystem functioning are frequent in natural systems, however research on year-round plant diversification to improve agroecosystem outcomes is limited. Challenges such as lag times for soil health benefits during the early transition years of cover cropping may be compensated by increases in crop yield from cash crop rotations. To better understand management strategies that could promote agroecosystem productivity and sustainability, we explored responses of agronomic and soil multifunctionality to simultaneous winter cover crop mixes and cash crop rotation using a three-year field experiment in western Tennessee, USA. Cover crop treatments included a no cover crop control (winter fallow), single-species winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), single-species crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.), two-species wheat-clover mix, and five-species mix of cereal rye (Secale cereale L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), clover, hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth), and radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Cropping systems included continuous corn (Zea mays L.), continuous soybean (Glycine max L.), corn-soybean rotation, and corn-cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)-soybean rotation. Total agronomic and soil health multifunctionality were weakly correlated across treatment combinations. The single-species clover and both mixes led to the highest agronomic multifunctionality in all cropping systems. Single-species wheat and wheat-clover mix provided the greatest cover crop biomass inputs, but both cover crops decreased overall cash crop yields (corn, cotton, and soybean scaled within crop and year) relative to the five-species mix. This result for yield was driven by year-one reductions in corn yield by averages of 2.15 and 1.74 Mg ha−1 in single-species wheat and wheat-clover mix cover cropped plots (respectively) compared to all other cover crop treatments. Cash crop rotation did not influence agronomic multifunctionality, although in year three, rotation with soybean increased corn yield by 1.49 Mg ha−1 yr−1 relative to monocropped corn, and rotation with corn and cotton increased soybean yield by 0.34 Mg ha−1 yr−1 relative to monocropped soybean. Wheat-clover mix as a cover crop increased mineral-associated organic C relative to winter fallow in the continuous soybean system, however there were no strong overall influences of cover crop or crop rotation on soil multifunctionality. Overall, our results suggest that winter cover crops can increase agronomic benefits of cash cropping systems in the southeastern United States within three years of adoption, but soil health benefits may be more difficult to detect in this short timeframe.
覆盖和经济作物同时多样化:短期农艺和土壤健康成果
植物多样性与生态系统功能之间的正相关关系在自然系统中是常见的,但全年植物多样性改善农业生态系统结果的研究有限。在覆盖种植的早期过渡年间,诸如土壤健康效益滞后等挑战可通过经济作物轮作带来的作物产量增加得到补偿。为了更好地了解能够促进农业生态系统生产力和可持续性的管理策略,我们在美国田纳西州西部进行了为期三年的田间试验,探讨了农艺和土壤多功能对冬季覆盖作物混合和经济作物轮作的响应。覆盖作物处理包括无覆盖作物控制(冬季休耕)、单种冬小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)、单种深红色三叶草(Trifolium incarnatum L.)、两种小麦-三叶草混合,以及五种谷物黑麦(Secale cereale L.)、燕麦(Avena sativa L.)、三叶草、毛豌豆(Vicia villosa Roth)和萝卜(Raphanus sativus L.)混合。种植系统包括玉米连作(Zea mays L.)、大豆连作(Glycine max L.)、玉米-大豆轮作和玉米-棉花(Gossypium hirsutum L.)-大豆轮作。农艺和土壤健康综合功能在不同处理组合间呈弱相关。在所有种植制度中,单种三叶草和两种混合种植导致最高的农艺多功能。单种小麦和小麦-三叶草混合提供了最大的覆盖作物生物量投入,但与五种混合相比,这两种覆盖作物都降低了经济作物的总体产量(玉米、棉花和大豆在作物和年份内按比例计算)。与其他覆盖作物处理相比,单种小麦和小麦-三叶草混合覆盖作物地块的玉米产量(分别为2.15和1.74 Mg ha - 1)每年平均减少。经济作物轮作对农艺多功能性没有影响,尽管在第三年,与单作玉米相比,大豆轮作使玉米产量增加了1.49 Mg ha - 1 year - 1,玉米和棉花轮作使大豆产量相对于单作大豆增加了0.34 Mg ha - 1 year - 1。在大豆连作系统中,小麦-三叶草作为覆盖作物增加了与矿物质相关的有机碳,但覆盖作物和轮作对土壤多功能性的总体影响不强。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,在美国东南部采用冬季覆盖作物可以在三年内增加经济种植系统的农艺效益,但在这么短的时间内,土壤健康效益可能更难检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书