Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Quad Zygomatic, Transnasal and Pterygoid Implants for Rehabilitation of Patients with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla.

IF 1.7
Onur Şahin, Onur Odabaşı, Xhini Rizaj, Ender Akan
{"title":"Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Quad Zygomatic, Transnasal and Pterygoid Implants for Rehabilitation of Patients with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla.","authors":"Onur Şahin, Onur Odabaşı, Xhini Rizaj, Ender Akan","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the effects of different occlusal forces on quad zygoma, transnasal and pterygoid implants in patients with severely atrophic maxilla using finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using cone beam computed tomography data from a patient with a severely atrophic maxilla, a three-dimensional finite element analysis model was created. Three models were developed: Model 1, a quad zygoma model with four zygomatic implants placed using the extrasinus technique; Model 2, a combination of one zygomatic implant placed using the extrasinus technique and one transnasal implant; and Model 3, with transnasal, zygomatic and pterygoid implants. Two different forces were applied: a 150 N vertical force at the first, second premolar and the first molar region and functional force consisting of a 100 N vertical force combined with a 50 N horizontal force at the same locations. Stress values in the bone, implants, abutments and prosthetic framework were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quad zygoma model (Model 1) demonstrated the highest stress values on the implant, abutment, and prosthetic framework under both vertical and functional forces. Model 2, which included transnasal and zygomatic implants, showed lower stress values compared to Model 1. Model 3, supported by pterygoid implants, exhibited lower stress levels on the bone, implants, abutments and prostheses compared to the other models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the results of our study, the use of transnasal implants with zygomatic implants presents a method as an alternative to quad zygoma protocol. Additionally, in the model supported by pterygoid implants, the absence of cantilevers resulted in reduced stresses on the bone, implant, abutment, and prosthetic framework. We recommend the application of pterygoid implants alongside zygomatic and transnasal implants for long-term success and the prevention of biomechanical complications in the rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxilla.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of different occlusal forces on quad zygoma, transnasal and pterygoid implants in patients with severely atrophic maxilla using finite element analysis.

Materials and methods: Using cone beam computed tomography data from a patient with a severely atrophic maxilla, a three-dimensional finite element analysis model was created. Three models were developed: Model 1, a quad zygoma model with four zygomatic implants placed using the extrasinus technique; Model 2, a combination of one zygomatic implant placed using the extrasinus technique and one transnasal implant; and Model 3, with transnasal, zygomatic and pterygoid implants. Two different forces were applied: a 150 N vertical force at the first, second premolar and the first molar region and functional force consisting of a 100 N vertical force combined with a 50 N horizontal force at the same locations. Stress values in the bone, implants, abutments and prosthetic framework were evaluated.

Results: The quad zygoma model (Model 1) demonstrated the highest stress values on the implant, abutment, and prosthetic framework under both vertical and functional forces. Model 2, which included transnasal and zygomatic implants, showed lower stress values compared to Model 1. Model 3, supported by pterygoid implants, exhibited lower stress levels on the bone, implants, abutments and prostheses compared to the other models.

Conclusions: According to the results of our study, the use of transnasal implants with zygomatic implants presents a method as an alternative to quad zygoma protocol. Additionally, in the model supported by pterygoid implants, the absence of cantilevers resulted in reduced stresses on the bone, implant, abutment, and prosthetic framework. We recommend the application of pterygoid implants alongside zygomatic and transnasal implants for long-term success and the prevention of biomechanical complications in the rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxilla.

颧、经鼻、翼状四关节种植体对上颌严重萎缩患者康复的三维有限元分析。
目的:采用有限元分析方法比较不同咬合力对上颌严重萎缩患者四颧、经鼻和翼状体种植体的影响。材料与方法:利用锥束计算机断层扫描数据,建立了上颌严重萎缩患者的三维有限元分析模型。建立了三种模型:模型1,采用肌外技术放置四个颧骨植入物的四侧颧骨模型;模型2,使用肌外技术放置一个颧假体和一个经鼻假体的组合;模型3,经鼻、颧和翼状植入物。在第一、第二前磨牙和第一磨牙区域分别施加150牛的垂直力,在相同位置施加100牛的垂直力和50牛的水平力。评估骨、种植体、基台和假体框架的应力值。结果:在垂直力和功能力作用下,四头颧骨模型(模型1)对种植体、基台和假体框架的应力值最高。模型2包括经鼻和颧植入物,与模型1相比显示出更低的应力值。与其他模型相比,翼状骨种植体支撑的模型3对骨、种植体、基台和假体的应力水平较低。结论:根据我们的研究结果,使用经鼻颧骨植入物提供了一种替代四侧颧骨方案的方法。此外,在翼状假体支撑的模型中,没有悬臂导致骨、假体、基台和假体框架上的应力减少。我们推荐翼状假体与颧骨和经鼻假体一起应用,以取得长期成功,并预防严重萎缩上颌康复的生物力学并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书