{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 on Invasive Pneumococcal Disease: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Features and Antibiotic Resistance across Pandemic Periods.","authors":"Enes Kasım Tekgül, Güzin Cinel, Saliha Kanık-Yüksek, Tuğba Erat, Seval Özen, Aslınur Özkaya Parlakay, Aysun Yahşi, Bedia Dinç, Belgin Gülhan, Gülsüm İclal Bayhan","doi":"10.3947/ic.2025.0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and associated infection control measures (lockdowns, masking) dramatically altered infectious disease epidemiology, including reduced invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) incidence. This study aimed to assess the pandemic effects on IPD clinical features, outcomes, and antibiotic resistance in children.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included pediatric patients (1 month to 18 years) diagnosed with IPD, comparing two distinct periods: the pre-pandemic era (March 2014-February 2020) and pandemic/post-pandemic era (March 2020-March 2024). Clinical characteristics and antibiotic resistance patterns of IPD patients were compared between the pre-pandemic and pandemic/post-pandemic periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 61 cases (27 pre-pandemic, 34 pandemic/post-pandemic), age distribution remained similar (median 46 <i>vs.</i> 49 months, <i>P</i>=0.799). The distribution of IPD manifestations and vaccine failure rates (70.4% <i>vs.</i> 76.5%) were consistent between periods. Comparative analysis revealed significantly reduced susceptibility rates during the pandemic/post-pandemic period versus pre-pandemic for penicillin, ceftriaxone, and fluoroquinolones.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPD remains a significant pediatric health concern. IPD continues to disproportionately affect children under five years of age, with no significant pandemic-related changes in age distribution, disease manifestations, or clinical outcomes. The concerning rise in resistance to first-line antibiotics during the pandemic underscores the urgent need for robust antimicrobial stewardship programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51616,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"531-540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2025.0068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and associated infection control measures (lockdowns, masking) dramatically altered infectious disease epidemiology, including reduced invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) incidence. This study aimed to assess the pandemic effects on IPD clinical features, outcomes, and antibiotic resistance in children.
Materials and methods: This study included pediatric patients (1 month to 18 years) diagnosed with IPD, comparing two distinct periods: the pre-pandemic era (March 2014-February 2020) and pandemic/post-pandemic era (March 2020-March 2024). Clinical characteristics and antibiotic resistance patterns of IPD patients were compared between the pre-pandemic and pandemic/post-pandemic periods.
Results: Among 61 cases (27 pre-pandemic, 34 pandemic/post-pandemic), age distribution remained similar (median 46 vs. 49 months, P=0.799). The distribution of IPD manifestations and vaccine failure rates (70.4% vs. 76.5%) were consistent between periods. Comparative analysis revealed significantly reduced susceptibility rates during the pandemic/post-pandemic period versus pre-pandemic for penicillin, ceftriaxone, and fluoroquinolones.
Conclusion: IPD remains a significant pediatric health concern. IPD continues to disproportionately affect children under five years of age, with no significant pandemic-related changes in age distribution, disease manifestations, or clinical outcomes. The concerning rise in resistance to first-line antibiotics during the pandemic underscores the urgent need for robust antimicrobial stewardship programs.
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行和相关的感染控制措施(封锁、掩蔽)显著改变了传染病流行病学,包括降低了侵袭性肺炎球菌病(IPD)的发病率。本研究旨在评估大流行对儿童IPD临床特征、结局和抗生素耐药性的影响。材料和方法:本研究纳入诊断为IPD的儿科患者(1个月至18岁),比较两个不同时期:大流行前时代(2014年3月至2020年2月)和大流行/大流行后时代(2020年3月至2024年3月)。比较大流行前和大流行/大流行后期间IPD患者的临床特征和抗生素耐药性模式。结果:在61例病例中(27例为大流行前,34例为大流行/大流行后),年龄分布保持相似(中位数为46个月vs. 49个月,P=0.799)。不同时期IPD表现和疫苗失败率的分布(70.4% vs. 76.5%)是一致的。比较分析显示,与大流行前相比,大流行期间/大流行后对青霉素、头孢曲松和氟喹诺酮类药物的易感性显著降低。结论:IPD仍然是一个重要的儿科健康问题。IPD对5岁以下儿童的影响仍然不成比例,在年龄分布、疾病表现或临床结果方面没有与大流行相关的重大变化。大流行期间一线抗生素耐药性的上升令人担忧,这突出表明迫切需要强有力的抗微生物药物管理规划。