Subtraction Iodine Imaging Generated from Dual-Energy CT: Optimal Energy Determination and Evaluation of Sinonasal and Nasopharyngeal Malignancies.

Takashi Hiyama, Yusuke Miyasaka, Akihito Nakajima, Hirofumi Kuno, Kotaro Sekiya, Shioto Oda, Tomoaki Sasaki, So Tsushima, Tatsushi Kobayashi
{"title":"Subtraction Iodine Imaging Generated from Dual-Energy CT: Optimal Energy Determination and Evaluation of Sinonasal and Nasopharyngeal Malignancies.","authors":"Takashi Hiyama, Yusuke Miyasaka, Akihito Nakajima, Hirofumi Kuno, Kotaro Sekiya, Shioto Oda, Tomoaki Sasaki, So Tsushima, Tatsushi Kobayashi","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A9124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Subtraction iodine imaging (SII) and dual-energy CT-derived iodine imaging (DEII) have been proposed to enhance tumor delineation in head and neck cancers. However, the optimal energy for SII and the added diagnostic value of SII or DEII combined with conventional CT (CCT) remain uncertain. We aimed to determine the optimal energy for SII and to evaluate its incremental diagnostic benefits, as well as those of DEII.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-nine patients with histologically confirmed sinonasal or nasopharyngeal malignancies who underwent dual-energy CT (DECT) and contrast-enhanced MRI were included in this retrospective study. SII was generated by subtracting pre- and postcontrast virtual monochromatic images from the DECT images (45-75 keV, in 5-keV increments). Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were measured in the brain, prevertebral muscles, and skull base. Tumor delineation was assessed on a 5-point scale by 2 blinded radiologists, and the diagnostic performance for local tumor extension was evaluated using clustered receiver operating characteristic analysis with bootstrap resampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest CNR across all anatomic sites was consistently achieved with SII at 65 keV. Tumor delineation scores were significantly higher with SII than with DEII (median, 4.5 versus 2.0; <i>P</i> < .001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that CCT combined with SII yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC], 0.954), significantly outperforming CCT alone (AUC, 0.929; difference in AUC = 0.024; <i>P</i> = .02). The CCT combined with DEII did not show any significant improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SII at 65 keV provided optimal image quality, superior tumor delineation, and significantly improved diagnostic accuracy more than CCT did. Incorporating this imaging technique into CCT protocols may enhance the evaluation of tumor extension in sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A9124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Subtraction iodine imaging (SII) and dual-energy CT-derived iodine imaging (DEII) have been proposed to enhance tumor delineation in head and neck cancers. However, the optimal energy for SII and the added diagnostic value of SII or DEII combined with conventional CT (CCT) remain uncertain. We aimed to determine the optimal energy for SII and to evaluate its incremental diagnostic benefits, as well as those of DEII.

Materials and methods: Thirty-nine patients with histologically confirmed sinonasal or nasopharyngeal malignancies who underwent dual-energy CT (DECT) and contrast-enhanced MRI were included in this retrospective study. SII was generated by subtracting pre- and postcontrast virtual monochromatic images from the DECT images (45-75 keV, in 5-keV increments). Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were measured in the brain, prevertebral muscles, and skull base. Tumor delineation was assessed on a 5-point scale by 2 blinded radiologists, and the diagnostic performance for local tumor extension was evaluated using clustered receiver operating characteristic analysis with bootstrap resampling.

Results: The highest CNR across all anatomic sites was consistently achieved with SII at 65 keV. Tumor delineation scores were significantly higher with SII than with DEII (median, 4.5 versus 2.0; P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that CCT combined with SII yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC], 0.954), significantly outperforming CCT alone (AUC, 0.929; difference in AUC = 0.024; P = .02). The CCT combined with DEII did not show any significant improvements.

Conclusions: SII at 65 keV provided optimal image quality, superior tumor delineation, and significantly improved diagnostic accuracy more than CCT did. Incorporating this imaging technique into CCT protocols may enhance the evaluation of tumor extension in sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancies.

双能计算机断层扫描产生的减碘成像:鼻窦和鼻咽恶性肿瘤的最佳能量测定和评估。
背景与目的:减影碘成像(SII)和双能ct衍生碘成像(DEII)已被提出用于增强头颈部肿瘤的描绘。然而,SII的最佳能量以及SII或DEII联合常规CT (CCT)的附加诊断价值仍不确定。我们的目的是确定SII的最佳能量,并评估其增量诊断益处,以及DEII的益处。材料和方法:回顾性研究39例经组织学证实的鼻窦或鼻咽恶性肿瘤患者,均行双能CT和增强MRI检查。SII是通过从双能CT图像(45-75 keV,以5 keV为增量)中减去对比度前和对比度后的虚拟单色图像来生成的。测量脑、椎前肌肉和颅底的对比噪声比(CNRs)。由两名盲法放射科医生以5分制评估肿瘤描绘,并使用带bootstrap重采样的聚类接收器工作特征分析评估局部肿瘤扩展的诊断性能。结果:SII在65 keV时始终达到所有解剖部位的最高CNR。SII组的肿瘤描述评分明显高于DEII组(中位数,4.5 vs. 2.0; p < 0.001)。受试者工作特征分析显示,CCT联合SII的诊断准确率最高(曲线下面积[AUC], 0.954),显著优于单独CCT (AUC, 0.929;差异AUC = 0.024, p = 0.02)。CCT联合DEII无明显改善。结论:与CCT相比,65 keV的SII提供了最佳的图像质量,优越的肿瘤描绘,并显着提高了诊断准确性。将这种成像技术纳入CCT方案可以提高对鼻窦和鼻咽恶性肿瘤扩展的评估。缩写:DECT =双能CT, SII =减碘成像,DEII =双能CT衍生的碘成像,CNR =对比噪声比,CCT =常规CT, AUC =曲线下面积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书