Impact Profiles in Psoriatic Arthritis: An Exploratory Latent Class Analysis of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society Health Index.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rubén Queiro, Isla Morante
{"title":"Impact Profiles in Psoriatic Arthritis: An Exploratory Latent Class Analysis of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society Health Index.","authors":"Rubén Queiro, Isla Morante","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify and characterize distinct subgroups of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) based on their responses to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI), using latent class analysis (LCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an exploratory LCA on 17 dichotomous ASAS HI items in a cohort of patients with PsA (n = 90). Model adequacy was evaluated by log-likelihood, Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), entropy, and average posterior probabilities (AvePP). Clinical measures (Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease [PsAID], Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis [DAPSA], tender/swollen joint counts, treatment) were compared across classes. Sensitivity analyses with 3 to 4 classes assessed robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 6-class solution was retained, ordered from class 0 (lowest impact) to class 5 (highest impact). Mean ASAS HI ranged from 1.2 in class 0 to 11.6 in class 5, with parallel increases in PsAID and DAPSA. Conditional probabilities revealed distinct profiles: class 0 had minimal impairment, classes 1-2 showed predominantly physical function limitations of mild to moderate severity, class 3 combined physical and emotional function burden, class 4 was characterized by dominant participation and social impact, and class 5 displayed severe multidimensional impairment. All classes had AvePP > 0.86. Sensitivity analyses with <i>K</i> = 3 and <i>K</i> = 4 reproduced the same gradient of impact but provided less granular separation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LCA of the ASAS HI identified 6 clinically meaningful health impact profiles in PsA. These findings support the use of the ASAS HI as a multidimensional tool capable of capturing diverse patient experiences and may help inform individualized management strategies in PsA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"395-399"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2025-0756","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to identify and characterize distinct subgroups of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) based on their responses to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI), using latent class analysis (LCA).

Methods: We performed an exploratory LCA on 17 dichotomous ASAS HI items in a cohort of patients with PsA (n = 90). Model adequacy was evaluated by log-likelihood, Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), entropy, and average posterior probabilities (AvePP). Clinical measures (Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease [PsAID], Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis [DAPSA], tender/swollen joint counts, treatment) were compared across classes. Sensitivity analyses with 3 to 4 classes assessed robustness.

Results: A 6-class solution was retained, ordered from class 0 (lowest impact) to class 5 (highest impact). Mean ASAS HI ranged from 1.2 in class 0 to 11.6 in class 5, with parallel increases in PsAID and DAPSA. Conditional probabilities revealed distinct profiles: class 0 had minimal impairment, classes 1-2 showed predominantly physical function limitations of mild to moderate severity, class 3 combined physical and emotional function burden, class 4 was characterized by dominant participation and social impact, and class 5 displayed severe multidimensional impairment. All classes had AvePP > 0.86. Sensitivity analyses with K = 3 and K = 4 reproduced the same gradient of impact but provided less granular separation.

Conclusion: LCA of the ASAS HI identified 6 clinically meaningful health impact profiles in PsA. These findings support the use of the ASAS HI as a multidimensional tool capable of capturing diverse patient experiences and may help inform individualized management strategies in PsA.

asa健康指数的探索性潜在类分析揭示了银屑病关节炎的异质性影响概况。
目的:我们旨在利用潜在分类分析(LCA),基于对国际脊椎关节炎协会健康指数评估(ASAS HI)的反应,识别和表征银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者的不同亚组。方法:我们对一组PsA患者(n: 90)的17项asa HI进行了探索性LCA。通过对数似然、AIC、BIC、熵和平均后验概率(AvePP)来评估模型的充分性。临床测量(PsAID, DAPSA,压痛/肿胀关节计数,治疗)在不同班级之间进行比较。3-4类敏感性分析评估稳健性。结果:保留了6级溶液,从0级(最低影响)到5级(最高影响)排序。平均ASAS HI从0级的1.2到5级的11.6不等,PsAID和DAPSA平行增加。条件概率表现出不同的特征:第0类表现为轻度损害,第1-2类主要表现为轻度至中度的身体功能限制,第3类表现为身体和情绪功能负担,第4类表现为主导参与和社会影响,第5类表现为严重的多维损害。各班AvePP均为0.86。K=3和K=4的敏感性分析再现了相同的冲击梯度,但提供了较少的颗粒分离。结论:asa HI的潜在分类分析确定了PsA中6个具有临床意义的健康影响谱。这些发现支持使用ASAS HI作为一种多维工具,能够捕获不同的患者经验,并可能有助于为PsA的个性化管理策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rheumatology
Journal of Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Earl D. Silverman. The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 41 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书