Psychometric Properties of the Short-Form Revised Lifestyle Evaluation Scale for Metabolic Syndrome-Korean.

IF 2.2
Shinae Seo, Chun-Ja Kim, Se-Won Kang, Dae Jung Kim, Elizabeth A Schlenk
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Short-Form Revised Lifestyle Evaluation Scale for Metabolic Syndrome-Korean.","authors":"Shinae Seo, Chun-Ja Kim, Se-Won Kang, Dae Jung Kim, Elizabeth A Schlenk","doi":"10.1177/26350106251378720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of a short-form Revised Lifestyle Evaluation Scale for Metabolic Syndrome (RLES-MS)-Korean.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was administered to 211 people with diabetes who were taking medication for metabolic syndrome and attending an outpatient clinic at a university-affiliated hospital in Suwon, Korea. Structured questionnaires were used for the psychometric evaluation. The RLES-MS validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis, and reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega.ResultsThe interitem correlation analyses identified 2 low-correlation items, resulting in a 15-item scale. Factor analysis identified 4 dimensions of the RLES-MS: healthy eating and being active, monitoring and managing target goals, healthy coping, and awareness and taking medication. The 4-factor model explained 58.65% of the total variance. Item 8 (taking medication) scored the highest, and Item 2 (healthy eating) scored the lowest, followed by Item 13 (monitoring and managing the target values). Overall, Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega were .864 and .866, respectively. The RLES-MS showed significant associations with quality of life (<i>r</i> = .426, <i>P</i> < .001), self-efficacy (<i>r</i> = .530, <i>P</i> < .001), depressive symptoms (<i>r</i> = -.430, <i>P</i> < .001), and A1C (<i>r</i> = -.163, <i>P</i> = .018).ConclusionsThe RLES-MS showed good validity and moderate reliability, supporting its clinical use for evaluating lifestyle behaviors in Korean people with diabetes and metabolic syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":75187,"journal":{"name":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","volume":"51 6","pages":"578-588"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106251378720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of a short-form Revised Lifestyle Evaluation Scale for Metabolic Syndrome (RLES-MS)-Korean.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was administered to 211 people with diabetes who were taking medication for metabolic syndrome and attending an outpatient clinic at a university-affiliated hospital in Suwon, Korea. Structured questionnaires were used for the psychometric evaluation. The RLES-MS validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis, and reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega.ResultsThe interitem correlation analyses identified 2 low-correlation items, resulting in a 15-item scale. Factor analysis identified 4 dimensions of the RLES-MS: healthy eating and being active, monitoring and managing target goals, healthy coping, and awareness and taking medication. The 4-factor model explained 58.65% of the total variance. Item 8 (taking medication) scored the highest, and Item 2 (healthy eating) scored the lowest, followed by Item 13 (monitoring and managing the target values). Overall, Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega were .864 and .866, respectively. The RLES-MS showed significant associations with quality of life (r = .426, P < .001), self-efficacy (r = .530, P < .001), depressive symptoms (r = -.430, P < .001), and A1C (r = -.163, P = .018).ConclusionsThe RLES-MS showed good validity and moderate reliability, supporting its clinical use for evaluating lifestyle behaviors in Korean people with diabetes and metabolic syndrome.

朝鲜族代谢综合征简易生活方式评价量表的心理测量特性。
目的评价韩国简易代谢综合征生活方式评价量表(RLES-MS)的效度和信度。方法对在韩国水原某大学附属医院门诊接受代谢综合征药物治疗的211例糖尿病患者进行横断面调查。采用结构化问卷进行心理测量评估。采用探索性因子分析检验RLES-MS效度,采用Cronbach’s alpha和McDonald’s omega评估信度。结果项目间相关分析鉴定出2个低相关项目,共编制15个项目量表。因子分析确定了RLES-MS的4个维度:健康饮食和积极运动、监测和管理目标目标、健康应对、意识和服药。4因素模型解释了总方差的58.65%。第8项(服药)得分最高,第2项(健康饮食)得分最低,第13项(监测和管理目标值)得分最低。总的来说,克朗巴赫的α和麦当劳的ω是。864和。866年,分别。RLES-MS与生活质量(r = .426, P < .001)、自我效能感(r = .530, P < .001)、抑郁症状(r = -.430, P < .001)和糖化血红蛋白(r = - 0.163, P = .018)有显著相关性。结论RLES-MS具有良好的效度和中等信度,支持其在韩国糖尿病和代谢综合征患者生活方式行为评价中的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书