The Pelvic Pain Bias Assessment: a new assessment of interpretation bias specific to pelvic pain.

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
PAIN® Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-02 DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003873
Brydee Pickup, Louise Sharpe, Rachel E Menzies, Jemma Todd
{"title":"The Pelvic Pain Bias Assessment: a new assessment of interpretation bias specific to pelvic pain.","authors":"Brydee Pickup, Louise Sharpe, Rachel E Menzies, Jemma Todd","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Pelvic pain is a common and often debilitating experience with limited treatment options. Improving understanding of the psychosocial mechanisms involved in pelvic pain experiences will enhance the efficacy of pain management interventions. Interpretation bias is a promising psychosocial factor in leading models of chronic pain, yet its relevance for pelvic pain remains poorly understood. The current study sought to assess disorder specific interpretation bias in people with endometriosis and other pelvic pain-related conditions. To do so, we developed a new interpretation bias assessment tool based on existing literature and used this to investigate interpretation bias and relationships with pain, menstrual symptoms, and psychological distress across pelvic pain-related conditions. The sample comprised 342 individuals including those with endometriosis, adenomyosis, chronic pelvic pain, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and those without pelvic pain-related conditions. Participants completed an online survey including demographics, new and modified interpretation bias scenarios, pain-related outcomes, and psychological distress. After a rigorous item selection process, 27 ambiguous pelvic pain-related scenarios were retained, forming the Pelvic Pain Bias Assessment (PPBA). Using the PPBA, we replicated our previous finding of elevated interpretation bias among individuals with endometriosis relative to controls and found interpretation bias was also elevated among individuals with other pelvic pain-related conditions relative to controls. Stronger interpretation bias was associated with worse pelvic pain and menstrual symptoms among individuals with and without pelvic pain-related conditions. This study adds to the growing evidence that interpretation bias is associated with a range of pain conditions and poorer pain-related outcomes in pelvic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"1016-1025"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003873","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Pelvic pain is a common and often debilitating experience with limited treatment options. Improving understanding of the psychosocial mechanisms involved in pelvic pain experiences will enhance the efficacy of pain management interventions. Interpretation bias is a promising psychosocial factor in leading models of chronic pain, yet its relevance for pelvic pain remains poorly understood. The current study sought to assess disorder specific interpretation bias in people with endometriosis and other pelvic pain-related conditions. To do so, we developed a new interpretation bias assessment tool based on existing literature and used this to investigate interpretation bias and relationships with pain, menstrual symptoms, and psychological distress across pelvic pain-related conditions. The sample comprised 342 individuals including those with endometriosis, adenomyosis, chronic pelvic pain, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and those without pelvic pain-related conditions. Participants completed an online survey including demographics, new and modified interpretation bias scenarios, pain-related outcomes, and psychological distress. After a rigorous item selection process, 27 ambiguous pelvic pain-related scenarios were retained, forming the Pelvic Pain Bias Assessment (PPBA). Using the PPBA, we replicated our previous finding of elevated interpretation bias among individuals with endometriosis relative to controls and found interpretation bias was also elevated among individuals with other pelvic pain-related conditions relative to controls. Stronger interpretation bias was associated with worse pelvic pain and menstrual symptoms among individuals with and without pelvic pain-related conditions. This study adds to the growing evidence that interpretation bias is associated with a range of pain conditions and poorer pain-related outcomes in pelvic pain.

骨盆疼痛偏倚评估:一种针对骨盆疼痛的解释偏倚的新评估。
摘要:骨盆疼痛是一种常见且经常使人虚弱的经历,治疗方案有限。提高对骨盆疼痛经历的社会心理机制的理解将提高疼痛管理干预的有效性。在慢性疼痛的主要模型中,解释偏差是一个很有希望的社会心理因素,但其与盆腔疼痛的相关性仍然知之甚少。目前的研究旨在评估患有子宫内膜异位症和其他盆腔疼痛相关疾病的患者的疾病特异性解释偏差。为此,我们在现有文献的基础上开发了一种新的解释偏倚评估工具,并使用该工具来研究盆腔疼痛相关疾病的解释偏倚及其与疼痛、月经症状和心理困扰的关系。样本包括342人,包括患有子宫内膜异位症、bbb、慢性盆腔疼痛、多囊卵巢综合征和没有盆腔疼痛相关疾病的人。参与者完成了一项在线调查,包括人口统计、新的和修改的解释偏差情景、疼痛相关结果和心理困扰。经过严格的项目选择过程,保留了27个与骨盆疼痛相关的模糊情景,形成了骨盆疼痛偏差评估(PPBA)。使用PPBA,我们重复了之前的发现,子宫内膜异位症患者的解释偏倚相对于对照组升高,并且发现其他盆腔疼痛相关疾病患者的解释偏倚也相对于对照组升高。在有或没有盆腔疼痛相关疾病的个体中,更强的解释偏倚与更严重的盆腔疼痛和月经症状相关。越来越多的证据表明,解释偏倚与骨盆疼痛的一系列疼痛状况和较差的疼痛相关结果有关,本研究进一步证实了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书