Insecticide susceptibility of Japanese mason bees (Osmia spp.) versus that of the western honey bee (Apis mellifera).

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Yugo Seko, Makihiko Ikegami, Yoichi Ishiguri, Tomoyuki Yokoi, Koichi Goka, Yoshiko Sakamoto
{"title":"Insecticide susceptibility of Japanese mason bees (<i>Osmia</i> spp.) <i>versus</i> that of the western honey bee (<i>Apis mellifera</i>).","authors":"Yugo Seko, Makihiko Ikegami, Yoichi Ishiguri, Tomoyuki Yokoi, Koichi Goka, Yoshiko Sakamoto","doi":"10.1584/jpestics.D25-036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute toxicity of pesticides to wild bee species is inferred by using the LD<sub>50</sub> values of the western honey bee, <i>Apis mellifera</i>, as a standard baseline. However, substantial discrepancies are often reported between the LD<sub>50</sub> values for wild bees and those for <i>A. mellifera</i>. Here, we conducted tests to compare acute toxicity between Japanese mason bees (<i>Osmia</i> spp.) and the western honey bee. For nearly all tested insecticides, the mortality rates of mason bees were equivalent to, or slightly lower than, those of the western honey bee. However, the LD<sub>50</sub> of acetamiprid in male mason bees was approximately five-fold lower than that in workers of the western honey bee. These results suggest that, although the current pesticide risk assessment is generally conservative for Japanese mason bees, continued attention is warranted to ensure that their sensitivity-particularly to acetamiprid-remains within the presumed safety factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":16712,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pesticide Science","volume":"50 4","pages":"148-154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12665439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pesticide Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D25-036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute toxicity of pesticides to wild bee species is inferred by using the LD50 values of the western honey bee, Apis mellifera, as a standard baseline. However, substantial discrepancies are often reported between the LD50 values for wild bees and those for A. mellifera. Here, we conducted tests to compare acute toxicity between Japanese mason bees (Osmia spp.) and the western honey bee. For nearly all tested insecticides, the mortality rates of mason bees were equivalent to, or slightly lower than, those of the western honey bee. However, the LD50 of acetamiprid in male mason bees was approximately five-fold lower than that in workers of the western honey bee. These results suggest that, although the current pesticide risk assessment is generally conservative for Japanese mason bees, continued attention is warranted to ensure that their sensitivity-particularly to acetamiprid-remains within the presumed safety factor.

Abstract Image

日本石蜂(Osmia spp.)与西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)对杀虫剂的敏感性。
农药对野生蜜蜂的急性毒性是用西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)的LD50值作为标准基线来推断的。然而,野生蜜蜂的LD50值与蜜蜂的LD50值之间经常有实质性的差异。在这里,我们进行了测试,比较日本石匠蜂(Osmia spp.)和西方蜜蜂的急性毒性。在几乎所有被测试的杀虫剂中,石匠蜂的死亡率与西部蜜蜂相当,或略低于西部蜜蜂。然而,对啶虫脒在雄梅森蜂体内的LD50比在工蜂体内的LD50低约5倍。这些结果表明,尽管目前对日本石匠蜂的农药风险评估总体上是保守的,但有必要继续关注,以确保它们的敏感性,特别是对扑虫脒的敏感性,保持在假定的安全系数之内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pesticide Science
Journal of Pesticide Science 农林科学-昆虫学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pesticide Science publishes the results of original research regarding the chemistry and biochemistry of pesticides including bio-based materials. It also covers their metabolism, toxicology, environmental fate and formulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书