Ontologically Challenging Psychedelic Experiences: Considerations for Managing Associated Distress.

Q3 Neuroscience
Eirini K Argyri, Jules Evans
{"title":"Ontologically Challenging Psychedelic Experiences: Considerations for Managing Associated Distress.","authors":"Eirini K Argyri, Jules Evans","doi":"10.1007/7854_2025_609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychedelic substances have been increasingly recognised for their potential in treating various mental health conditions, yet they can also induce what we call ontologically challenging psychedelic experiences (OCPEs), a concept developed in our research to describe experiences that profoundly disrupt an individual's sense of self, reality, and existence. We present OCPEs not as a diagnostic category but as a phenomenological and harm reduction perspective on certain destabilising psychedelic experiences.While some individuals integrate OCPEs with ease, others struggle with ontological instability, existential distress, and impairments that persist long after acute effects. Importantly, ontological challenges are not always negative: for many, when they feel adequately resourced, they form part of the therapeutic mechanism and are a valued opportunity for personal development and growth. Drawing on our qualitative studies alongside other psychological research, we examine the phenomenology of OCPEs and their challenging aftermath, as well as strategies that may help facilitate recovery and integration. Grounding techniques, cognitive (re)framing, and supportive structures are discussed as potentially beneficial approaches and resources.Finally, we outline ethical and practical implications for clinical and harm reduction practice. We highlight the limits of informed consent in psychedelic therapy and argue for the value of preparation and post-experience support that is attuned to ontological disruptions. As empirical evidence remains limited, further research is needed to refine best practices. The development of an ethically responsible approach, informed by the phenomenology of OCPEs, can help maximise benefits of psychedelic substances while minimising long-term harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":11257,"journal":{"name":"Current topics in behavioral neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"431-450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current topics in behavioral neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2025_609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychedelic substances have been increasingly recognised for their potential in treating various mental health conditions, yet they can also induce what we call ontologically challenging psychedelic experiences (OCPEs), a concept developed in our research to describe experiences that profoundly disrupt an individual's sense of self, reality, and existence. We present OCPEs not as a diagnostic category but as a phenomenological and harm reduction perspective on certain destabilising psychedelic experiences.While some individuals integrate OCPEs with ease, others struggle with ontological instability, existential distress, and impairments that persist long after acute effects. Importantly, ontological challenges are not always negative: for many, when they feel adequately resourced, they form part of the therapeutic mechanism and are a valued opportunity for personal development and growth. Drawing on our qualitative studies alongside other psychological research, we examine the phenomenology of OCPEs and their challenging aftermath, as well as strategies that may help facilitate recovery and integration. Grounding techniques, cognitive (re)framing, and supportive structures are discussed as potentially beneficial approaches and resources.Finally, we outline ethical and practical implications for clinical and harm reduction practice. We highlight the limits of informed consent in psychedelic therapy and argue for the value of preparation and post-experience support that is attuned to ontological disruptions. As empirical evidence remains limited, further research is needed to refine best practices. The development of an ethically responsible approach, informed by the phenomenology of OCPEs, can help maximise benefits of psychedelic substances while minimising long-term harm.

本体论上具有挑战性的迷幻体验:管理相关痛苦的考虑。
致幻剂在治疗各种心理健康状况方面的潜力已经得到越来越多的认可,但它们也会引发我们所谓的本体论上具有挑战性的迷幻体验(OCPEs),这是我们在研究中发展起来的一个概念,用来描述深刻破坏个人自我、现实和存在感的体验。我们提出ocpe不是作为一个诊断类别,而是作为现象学和减少伤害的角度对某些不稳定的迷幻体验。虽然有些人可以轻松地融入ocpe,但其他人则与本体论不稳定、存在的痛苦和急性效应后长期存在的损伤作斗争。重要的是,本体论的挑战并不总是消极的:对许多人来说,当他们感到资源充足时,它们构成了治疗机制的一部分,是个人发展和成长的宝贵机会。根据我们的定性研究以及其他心理学研究,我们研究了ocpe的现象学及其具有挑战性的后果,以及可能有助于促进恢复和融入的策略。基础技术,认知(重新)框架和支持结构作为潜在的有益的方法和资源进行了讨论。最后,我们概述了临床和减少伤害实践的伦理和实践意义。我们强调了迷幻治疗中知情同意的局限性,并论证了准备和体验后支持的价值,这与本体论中断相一致。由于经验证据仍然有限,需要进一步研究以完善最佳做法。在ocpe现象的指导下,开发一种道德上负责任的方法,可以帮助将致幻剂的益处最大化,同时将长期危害降到最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书