New geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic constraints on the genesis of kimberlites and ultramafic lamprophyres from the Adelaide Fold Belt and Gawler Craton, South Australia

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Hayden Dalton, Andrea Giuliani, Angus Fitzpayne, Bradley J. Peters
{"title":"New geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic constraints on the genesis of kimberlites and ultramafic lamprophyres from the Adelaide Fold Belt and Gawler Craton, South Australia","authors":"Hayden Dalton,&nbsp;Andrea Giuliani,&nbsp;Angus Fitzpayne,&nbsp;Bradley J. Peters","doi":"10.1007/s00710-025-00938-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the geochemical and isotopic characteristics of Jurassic kimberlites and ultramafic lamprophyres (UMLs) from four clusters within the Adelaide Fold Belt (AFB) and two within the Gawler Craton in South Australia. Petrographic analysis, including the occurrence of magmatic clinopyroxene in the groundmass, supported by a review of available mica and spinel compositional data, indicates that many previously classified kimberlites (Eurelia, Angaston and Terowie) are, in fact, ultramafic lamprophyres. New whole-rock major-, trace element and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic results, augmented by in-situ perovskite and carbonate Sr isotopes, reveal that this sample suite exhibits extensive geochemical variability. These new data highlight the significant role of crustal contamination in modifying not only bulk-rock major, trace element and Sr isotope systematics, the latter being pristine exclusively in low-SiO<sub>2</sub> samples, but also Nd and Hf isotopic signatures. This is most evident for the Mount Hope (εNd<sub>(i)</sub> = -5.1 to -1.5; εHf<sub>(i)</sub> = -8.6 to -2.7) and Cleve (εNd<sub>(i)</sub> = -3.7 to -0.2; εHf<sub>(i)</sub> = -6.6 to +0.3) kimberlites of the Gawler Craton which display geochemically enriched compositions that are rarely seen in kimberlitic rocks. In contrast, the AFB samples exhibit less inter-sample isotopic variability and have compositions that are more typical of kimberlites and UMLs globally (εNd<sub>(i)</sub> = +0.3 to +3.9; εHf<sub>(i)</sub> = +0.7 to +6.6). There is no clear lithospheric thickness control governing the absence of UMLs on the Gawler Craton and their presence within the AFB. Similarly, there are no systematic differences in Sr–Nd-Hf isotopes between uncontaminated kimberlites and UMLs, arguing against obvious differences in their asthenospheric sources. We tentatively suggest that contribution by more pervasively metasomatised lithospheric mantle beneath the AFB compared to the Gawler craton (based on existing garnet xenocryst data) may facilitate the formation of ultramafic lamprophyres in this region. While subduction along the southern palaeo-margin of Pangea likely did not directly trigger magmatism, it may have facilitated deep mantle upwelling linked to the contemporaneous Karoo-Ferrar Large Igneous Province, with related formation of kimberlites and UMLs in South Australia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18547,"journal":{"name":"Mineralogy and Petrology","volume":"119 4","pages":"1043 - 1068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00710-025-00938-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineralogy and Petrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00710-025-00938-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the geochemical and isotopic characteristics of Jurassic kimberlites and ultramafic lamprophyres (UMLs) from four clusters within the Adelaide Fold Belt (AFB) and two within the Gawler Craton in South Australia. Petrographic analysis, including the occurrence of magmatic clinopyroxene in the groundmass, supported by a review of available mica and spinel compositional data, indicates that many previously classified kimberlites (Eurelia, Angaston and Terowie) are, in fact, ultramafic lamprophyres. New whole-rock major-, trace element and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic results, augmented by in-situ perovskite and carbonate Sr isotopes, reveal that this sample suite exhibits extensive geochemical variability. These new data highlight the significant role of crustal contamination in modifying not only bulk-rock major, trace element and Sr isotope systematics, the latter being pristine exclusively in low-SiO2 samples, but also Nd and Hf isotopic signatures. This is most evident for the Mount Hope (εNd(i) = -5.1 to -1.5; εHf(i) = -8.6 to -2.7) and Cleve (εNd(i) = -3.7 to -0.2; εHf(i) = -6.6 to +0.3) kimberlites of the Gawler Craton which display geochemically enriched compositions that are rarely seen in kimberlitic rocks. In contrast, the AFB samples exhibit less inter-sample isotopic variability and have compositions that are more typical of kimberlites and UMLs globally (εNd(i) = +0.3 to +3.9; εHf(i) = +0.7 to +6.6). There is no clear lithospheric thickness control governing the absence of UMLs on the Gawler Craton and their presence within the AFB. Similarly, there are no systematic differences in Sr–Nd-Hf isotopes between uncontaminated kimberlites and UMLs, arguing against obvious differences in their asthenospheric sources. We tentatively suggest that contribution by more pervasively metasomatised lithospheric mantle beneath the AFB compared to the Gawler craton (based on existing garnet xenocryst data) may facilitate the formation of ultramafic lamprophyres in this region. While subduction along the southern palaeo-margin of Pangea likely did not directly trigger magmatism, it may have facilitated deep mantle upwelling linked to the contemporaneous Karoo-Ferrar Large Igneous Province, with related formation of kimberlites and UMLs in South Australia.

南澳大利亚阿德莱德褶皱带和高勒克拉通金伯利岩和超镁质煌斑岩成因的地球化学和Sr-Nd-Hf同位素新约束
本文研究了南澳阿德莱德褶皱带(AFB)的4个岩群和高勒克拉通(Gawler克拉通)的2个岩群的侏罗纪金伯利岩和超镁铁质煌斑岩(UMLs)的地球化学和同位素特征。岩石学分析,包括岩浆斜辉石在地块中的出现,以及对现有云母和尖晶石成分数据的回顾,表明许多以前分类的金伯利岩(Eurelia, Angaston和Terowie)实际上是超镁质煌斑岩。新的全岩主微量元素和Sr- nd - hf同位素结果,加上原位钙钛矿和碳酸盐Sr同位素,表明该样品组具有广泛的地球化学变异性。这些新数据表明,地壳污染不仅在改变大块岩石主元素、微量元素和Sr同位素系统(后者仅在低sio2样品中处于原始状态)方面发挥了重要作用,而且还改变了Nd和Hf同位素特征。这在希望山最为明显(εNd(i) = -5.1 ~ -1.5;ε高频(i) = -8.6 - -2.7)和克里夫(εNd (i) = -3.7 - -0.2;εHf(i) = -6.6 ~ +0.3)的高勒克拉通金伯利岩,其地球化学成分丰富,在金伯利岩中很少见到。相比之下,AFB样品的样品间同位素变异性较小,其组成更具有全球金伯利岩和UMLs的典型特征(εNd(i) = +0.3 ~ +3.9;εHf(i) = +0.7 ~ +6.6)。没有明确的岩石圈厚度控制来控制高勒克拉通上uml的缺失和它们在AFB内的存在。同样,未受污染的金伯利岩和UMLs之间的Sr-Nd-Hf同位素也没有系统差异,这说明它们的软流层来源存在明显差异。我们初步认为,与高勒克拉通相比,AFB下方更广泛的交代岩石圈地幔(基于现有的石榴石异种晶体数据)可能促进了该地区超镁铁质煌斑岩的形成。虽然沿泛大陆南部古边缘的俯冲作用可能没有直接引发岩浆活动,但它可能促进了与同时期karu - ferrar大火成岩省相关的深部地幔上涌,并在南澳大利亚形成了金伯利岩和uml。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mineralogy and Petrology
Mineralogy and Petrology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Mineralogy and Petrology welcomes manuscripts from the classical fields of mineralogy, igneous and metamorphic petrology, geochemistry, crystallography, as well as their applications in academic experimentation and research, materials science and engineering, for technology, industry, environment, or society. The journal strongly promotes cross-fertilization among Earth-scientific and applied materials-oriented disciplines. Purely descriptive manuscripts on regional topics will not be considered. Mineralogy and Petrology was founded in 1872 by Gustav Tschermak as "Mineralogische und Petrographische Mittheilungen". It is one of Europe''s oldest geoscience journals. Former editors include outstanding names such as Gustav Tschermak, Friedrich Becke, Felix Machatschki, Josef Zemann, and Eugen F. Stumpfl.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书