Artificial intelligence-powered signal analysis of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for the screening of Kaposi sarcoma at the point of care

IF 5.9 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Darke Hull, Juan Boza, Jason Manning, Xinying Chu, Ethel Cesarman, Aggrey Semeere, Jeffrey Martin and David Erickson
{"title":"Artificial intelligence-powered signal analysis of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for the screening of Kaposi sarcoma at the point of care","authors":"Darke Hull, Juan Boza, Jason Manning, Xinying Chu, Ethel Cesarman, Aggrey Semeere, Jeffrey Martin and David Erickson","doi":"10.1039/D5SD00068H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Unlike the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) lacks a consistent thermal cycle, making quantification particularly challenging. Previously, we demonstrated that LAMP can accurately diagnose Kaposi sarcoma (KS) from skin lesion biopsies at the point of care (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) = 0.967). A common approach in LAMP analysis involves setting a minimum absorbance threshold and time cutoff for positivity, which can introduce bias. We present a less biased, automated signal processing approach involving the fitting of a signal curve to five, two-parameter algebraic function fits, and the training of an artificial intelligence (AI) model on those parameters and their variances. An extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model was trained and tested on a primary dataset consisting of 1317 LAMP curves (from 451 unique patient samples with replicates). Five-fold <em>k</em>-validation on the train/test set yielded an receiver operating curve (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.952 ± 0.029. Each of the five-fold models were then validated on a separate secondary dataset of 966 LAMP curves (from 414 unique patient samples with replicates) and achieved an AUC of 0.950 ± 0.005. While the traditional methodology (which did not implement <em>k</em>-validation or a test/train split) outperformed the AI model's train/test set performance, the AI model generalized better and achieved a higher accuracy on the validation set (0.950 ± 0.005 <em>vs.</em> 0.9347). It performed even better when the analysis was applied directly to the raw signal data without additional pre-processing steps such as artifact filtering. This suggests that the AI model is more generalizable to new data and is able to discriminate KS-present and KS-absent samples better than traditional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":74786,"journal":{"name":"Sensors & diagnostics","volume":" 2","pages":" 242-247"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12661922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensors & diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2026/sd/d5sd00068h","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlike the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) lacks a consistent thermal cycle, making quantification particularly challenging. Previously, we demonstrated that LAMP can accurately diagnose Kaposi sarcoma (KS) from skin lesion biopsies at the point of care (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) = 0.967). A common approach in LAMP analysis involves setting a minimum absorbance threshold and time cutoff for positivity, which can introduce bias. We present a less biased, automated signal processing approach involving the fitting of a signal curve to five, two-parameter algebraic function fits, and the training of an artificial intelligence (AI) model on those parameters and their variances. An extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model was trained and tested on a primary dataset consisting of 1317 LAMP curves (from 451 unique patient samples with replicates). Five-fold k-validation on the train/test set yielded an receiver operating curve (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.952 ± 0.029. Each of the five-fold models were then validated on a separate secondary dataset of 966 LAMP curves (from 414 unique patient samples with replicates) and achieved an AUC of 0.950 ± 0.005. While the traditional methodology (which did not implement k-validation or a test/train split) outperformed the AI model's train/test set performance, the AI model generalized better and achieved a higher accuracy on the validation set (0.950 ± 0.005 vs. 0.9347). It performed even better when the analysis was applied directly to the raw signal data without additional pre-processing steps such as artifact filtering. This suggests that the AI model is more generalizable to new data and is able to discriminate KS-present and KS-absent samples better than traditional methods.

Abstract Image

人工智能驱动的环介导等温扩增(LAMP)信号分析在护理点筛查卡波西肉瘤。
与聚合酶链反应(PCR)不同,环介导的等温扩增(LAMP)缺乏一致的热循环,使得定量尤其具有挑战性。先前,我们证明LAMP可以准确地从护理点的皮肤病变活检中诊断卡波西肉瘤(KS)(受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC) = 0.967)。LAMP分析中的一种常见方法包括为正性设置最小吸光度阈值和时间截止,这可能会引入偏差。我们提出了一种偏差较小的自动信号处理方法,包括信号曲线拟合到五个双参数代数函数拟合,以及对这些参数及其方差的人工智能(AI)模型的训练。在包含1317条LAMP曲线(来自451个具有重复的独特患者样本)的主要数据集上训练并测试了极端梯度增强(XGB)模型。在训练/测试集上进行5倍k验证,受试者工作曲线(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为0.952±0.029。然后在966个LAMP曲线(来自414个具有重复的独特患者样本)的独立二级数据集上验证每个五重模型,并获得0.950±0.005的AUC。虽然传统方法(没有实现k验证或测试/训练分割)优于AI模型的训练/测试集性能,但AI模型的泛化效果更好,并且在验证集上实现了更高的精度(0.950±0.005 vs. 0.9347)。当分析直接应用于原始信号数据时,它的性能甚至更好,而不需要额外的预处理步骤,如伪影滤波。这表明人工智能模型对新数据的可泛化性更强,并且能够比传统方法更好地区分ks存在和ks缺失的样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书