Scoping the Landscape of Deep Learning for Alzheimer's Disease Stage Classification: Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities.

IF 9.1 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
BME frontiers Pub Date : 2025-11-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.34133/bmef.0202
Salleh Sonko, Mohamed Islam Houssam, Kossi Dodzi Bissadu, Brian O'Connor, Gahangir Hossain
{"title":"Scoping the Landscape of Deep Learning for Alzheimer's Disease Stage Classification: Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities.","authors":"Salleh Sonko, Mohamed Islam Houssam, Kossi Dodzi Bissadu, Brian O'Connor, Gahangir Hossain","doi":"10.34133/bmef.0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep learning (DL) models have been widely applied for Alzheimer's disease (AD) stage classification. This scoping review synthesizes recent research to evaluate current performance benchmarks, identify methodological limitations, and highlight translational barriers. DL has potential to augment diagnostic accuracy and accelerate early intervention in AD, but translation requires models that generalize across datasets and integrate into real-world clinical workflows. Following scoping review methodology, 18 peer-reviewed studies published between 2018 and 2024 were analyzed. We extracted dataset sources, preprocessing strategies, model architectures, performance metrics, and translational considerations. Most studies employed convolutional neural networks (CNNs) or transfer learning (TL) backbones with accuracies frequently reported above 90%. Comparative synthesis revealed that TL and custom CNNs achieved similar headline accuracies, with differences of less than one percentage point. Reported performance was highly sensitive to task framing (cross-sectional vs. progression) and dataset provenance, with curated subsets often yielding near-ceiling internal accuracies but limited generalizability. Only one study implemented true external validation, underscoring a critical translational gap. Cost-effectiveness was rarely discussed explicitly; however, several studies indicated that open datasets reduce financial barriers, while adapting pipelines for EMR, or multisite data entails substantial resource demands. DL for AD classification shows consistent high accuracy but limited robustness, with external validation and financial cost-effectiveness remaining underreported. Future progress depends on standardized evaluation protocols, explicit reporting of financial costs, and the development of clinically interpretable, workflow-integrated models.</p>","PeriodicalId":72430,"journal":{"name":"BME frontiers","volume":"6 ","pages":"0202"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12657713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BME frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/bmef.0202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) models have been widely applied for Alzheimer's disease (AD) stage classification. This scoping review synthesizes recent research to evaluate current performance benchmarks, identify methodological limitations, and highlight translational barriers. DL has potential to augment diagnostic accuracy and accelerate early intervention in AD, but translation requires models that generalize across datasets and integrate into real-world clinical workflows. Following scoping review methodology, 18 peer-reviewed studies published between 2018 and 2024 were analyzed. We extracted dataset sources, preprocessing strategies, model architectures, performance metrics, and translational considerations. Most studies employed convolutional neural networks (CNNs) or transfer learning (TL) backbones with accuracies frequently reported above 90%. Comparative synthesis revealed that TL and custom CNNs achieved similar headline accuracies, with differences of less than one percentage point. Reported performance was highly sensitive to task framing (cross-sectional vs. progression) and dataset provenance, with curated subsets often yielding near-ceiling internal accuracies but limited generalizability. Only one study implemented true external validation, underscoring a critical translational gap. Cost-effectiveness was rarely discussed explicitly; however, several studies indicated that open datasets reduce financial barriers, while adapting pipelines for EMR, or multisite data entails substantial resource demands. DL for AD classification shows consistent high accuracy but limited robustness, with external validation and financial cost-effectiveness remaining underreported. Future progress depends on standardized evaluation protocols, explicit reporting of financial costs, and the development of clinically interpretable, workflow-integrated models.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

深度学习在阿尔茨海默病分期分类中的应用:方法、挑战和机遇。
深度学习(DL)模型在阿尔茨海默病(AD)分期分类中得到了广泛应用。这个范围综述综合了最近的研究,以评估当前的性能基准,确定方法的局限性,并强调翻译的障碍。深度学习有可能提高诊断准确性,加速对阿尔茨海默病的早期干预,但翻译需要跨数据集推广的模型,并整合到现实世界的临床工作流程中。采用范围审查方法,分析了2018年至2024年间发表的18项同行评议研究。我们提取了数据集来源、预处理策略、模型架构、性能指标和翻译考虑因素。大多数研究采用卷积神经网络(cnn)或迁移学习(TL)主干,准确率经常在90%以上。对比综合显示,TL和定制cnn实现了相似的标题准确性,差异不到一个百分点。报告的性能对任务框架(横断面与进展)和数据集来源高度敏感,精心设计的子集通常产生接近上限的内部准确性,但泛化性有限。只有一项研究实施了真正的外部验证,强调了一个关键的翻译差距。很少明确讨论成本效益;然而,一些研究表明,开放数据集减少了财务障碍,而适应EMR或多站点数据的管道需要大量的资源需求。深度学习对AD分类具有一致的高准确性,但鲁棒性有限,外部验证和财务成本效益仍然未被充分报道。未来的进展取决于标准化的评估方案,明确的财务成本报告,以及临床可解释的工作流程集成模型的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书