The mixed resilience outcomes of water interventions in the pastoral drylands of the Horn of Africa

IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Disasters Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1111/disa.70027
Jackson Wachira, Masresha Taye, Nancy Balfour, Hussein Tadicha
{"title":"The mixed resilience outcomes of water interventions in the pastoral drylands of the Horn of Africa","authors":"Jackson Wachira,&nbsp;Masresha Taye,&nbsp;Nancy Balfour,&nbsp;Hussein Tadicha","doi":"10.1111/disa.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent decades, development and humanitarian actors in the Horn of Africa have employed the concept of resilience to design and justify the establishment of diverse water supply systems. The principal aim of these interventions is to enhance pastoralists' resilience to droughts and other shocks. However, limited empirical research has examined the resilience outcomes of new and existing water supply systems in pastoral areas. This study addresses this gap by analysing primary data collected in Marsabit County in northern Kenya and the Somali region of eastern Ethiopia. Adopting a contextual approach to resilience, the findings challenge the oversimplified narrative that links water supply systems in pastoral drylands directly to resilience. The results reveal major trade-offs: while water infrastructure enhances short-term water access, it also disrupts mobility, generates sociopolitical conflict, engenders ill health, exacerbates inequality, and spawns range degradation. The analysis shows that water supply systems contribute to resilience only when well-governed and aligned with mobility, resource access, diversification, and social networks—conditions rarely met in many dryland contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48088,"journal":{"name":"Disasters","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12667009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disasters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.70027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, development and humanitarian actors in the Horn of Africa have employed the concept of resilience to design and justify the establishment of diverse water supply systems. The principal aim of these interventions is to enhance pastoralists' resilience to droughts and other shocks. However, limited empirical research has examined the resilience outcomes of new and existing water supply systems in pastoral areas. This study addresses this gap by analysing primary data collected in Marsabit County in northern Kenya and the Somali region of eastern Ethiopia. Adopting a contextual approach to resilience, the findings challenge the oversimplified narrative that links water supply systems in pastoral drylands directly to resilience. The results reveal major trade-offs: while water infrastructure enhances short-term water access, it also disrupts mobility, generates sociopolitical conflict, engenders ill health, exacerbates inequality, and spawns range degradation. The analysis shows that water supply systems contribute to resilience only when well-governed and aligned with mobility, resource access, diversification, and social networks—conditions rarely met in many dryland contexts.

Abstract Image

非洲之角牧区旱地水干预措施的复原力好坏参半。
近几十年来,非洲之角的发展和人道主义行动者利用复原力的概念来设计和证明建立多样化供水系统的合理性。这些干预措施的主要目的是提高牧民对干旱和其他冲击的抵御能力。然而,有限的实证研究考察了牧区新建和现有供水系统的弹性结果。本研究通过分析在肯尼亚北部马萨比特县和埃塞俄比亚东部索马里地区收集的原始数据,解决了这一差距。通过对恢复力的上下文分析,研究结果挑战了将干旱牧区供水系统与恢复力直接联系起来的过于简单化的叙述。结果揭示了主要的权衡:虽然水基础设施增加了短期的水获取,但它也扰乱了流动性,产生了社会政治冲突,造成健康不良,加剧了不平等,并导致了范围退化。分析表明,供水系统只有在治理良好并与流动性、资源获取、多样化和社会网络相结合的情况下才能提高抗灾能力,而这些条件在许多旱地环境中很少满足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disasters
Disasters Multiple-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Disasters is a major, peer-reviewed quarterly journal reporting on all aspects of disaster studies, policy and management. It provides a forum for academics, policymakers and practitioners to publish high-quality research and practice concerning natural catastrophes, anthropogenic disasters, complex political emergencies and protracted crises around the world. The journal promotes the interchange of ideas and experience, maintaining a balance between field reports, case study articles of general interest and academic papers. Disasters: Is the leading journal in the field of disasters, protracted crises and complex emergencies Influences disaster prevention, mitigation and response policies and practices Adopts a world-wide geographical perspective Contains a mix of academic papers and field studies Promotes the interchange of ideas between practitioners, policy-makers and academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书