[Hungarian adaptation of the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire Revised].

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Melinda Reinhardt, Hunor Girasek, Alexandra Soós, Zsolt Horváth, Gábor Gazdag
{"title":"[Hungarian adaptation of the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire Revised].","authors":"Melinda Reinhardt, Hunor Girasek, Alexandra Soós, Zsolt Horváth, Gábor Gazdag","doi":"10.18071/isz.78.0375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Previous suicidal intent and attempt(s) are strong risk factors for current suicidal behaviour. In psy- chiatric practice, however, there are few self-report-based suicide risk assessment measures that can cover the past suicidal spectrum from multiple aspects and identify a cut-off point for suicidal risk. Our aim was therefore to introduce the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire Revised (SBQ-R) into the Hungarian test battery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In our cross-sectional questionnaire study, 229 hospitalized adult psychiatric patients (mean age = 41.64 ys; SD = 14.41; 56.3% female) participated. Beside the SBQ-R, the Rihmer's Brief Suicide Questionnaire, 6-item version, the Beck Hopelessness Scale and the Minnesota Multiphasic Persona-lity Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) clinical personality questionnaire were completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We confirmed the single-factor structure of the SBQ-R with excellent model fit indices in a Hungarian sample. The reliability of the questionnaire is adequate and its construct validity is optimal: it shows moderate to strong correlations with other measures of the suicide spectrum, with hopelessness and with the clinical scales of the MMPI-2. The cut-off point for suicidal risk was set at 7 points, broadly in line with international studies; patients at or above this value are 9 times more likely to have an expressed suicide risk. Hopelesness increases by 13.5% the possibility of the high-risk group membership based on the SBQ-R, while previous suicidal act(s) increase this odds five times higher.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The self-report-based SBQ-R is a reliable, valid, multi-faceted assessment of suicidal behaviour and an effective tool for screening suicidal risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":50394,"journal":{"name":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"78 11-12","pages":"375-387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.78.0375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Previous suicidal intent and attempt(s) are strong risk factors for current suicidal behaviour. In psy- chiatric practice, however, there are few self-report-based suicide risk assessment measures that can cover the past suicidal spectrum from multiple aspects and identify a cut-off point for suicidal risk. Our aim was therefore to introduce the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire Revised (SBQ-R) into the Hungarian test battery.

Methods: In our cross-sectional questionnaire study, 229 hospitalized adult psychiatric patients (mean age = 41.64 ys; SD = 14.41; 56.3% female) participated. Beside the SBQ-R, the Rihmer's Brief Suicide Questionnaire, 6-item version, the Beck Hopelessness Scale and the Minnesota Multiphasic Persona-lity Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) clinical personality questionnaire were completed.

Results: We confirmed the single-factor structure of the SBQ-R with excellent model fit indices in a Hungarian sample. The reliability of the questionnaire is adequate and its construct validity is optimal: it shows moderate to strong correlations with other measures of the suicide spectrum, with hopelessness and with the clinical scales of the MMPI-2. The cut-off point for suicidal risk was set at 7 points, broadly in line with international studies; patients at or above this value are 9 times more likely to have an expressed suicide risk. Hopelesness increases by 13.5% the possibility of the high-risk group membership based on the SBQ-R, while previous suicidal act(s) increase this odds five times higher.

Conclusion: The self-report-based SBQ-R is a reliable, valid, multi-faceted assessment of suicidal behaviour and an effective tool for screening suicidal risk.

[自杀行为问卷匈牙利版修订版]。
背景和目的:以前的自杀意图和企图是当前自杀行为的强烈危险因素。然而,在精神病学实践中,很少有基于自我报告的自杀风险评估方法可以从多个方面涵盖过去的自杀谱,并确定自杀风险的分界点。因此,我们的目的是将自杀行为问卷修订(SBQ-R)引入匈牙利测试电池。方法:采用横断面问卷调查法,对229例住院成人精神病患者(平均年龄41.64岁,SD = 14.41,女性56.3%)进行调查。除SBQ-R外,还完成了Rihmer自杀简易问卷(6项)、Beck绝望量表和明尼苏达多相人格量表-2 (MMPI-2)临床人格问卷。结果:我们在匈牙利样本中证实了SBQ-R的单因素结构,模型拟合指数很好。问卷的信度是足够的,其结构效度是最佳的:它显示出中等到强的相关性与其他测量自杀谱,绝望和临床量表的MMPI-2。自杀风险的分界点设定为7点,与国际研究基本一致;达到或高于此值的患者表达自杀风险的可能性高出9倍。根据SBQ-R,绝望使高风险群体成员的可能性增加13.5%,而先前的自杀行为使这一可能性增加5倍。结论:基于自我报告的SBQ-R是一种可靠、有效、多方面的自杀行为评估方法,是筛查自杀风险的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Clinical Neuroscience (Ideggyógyászati Szemle) is to provide a forum for the exchange of clinical and scientific information for a multidisciplinary community. The Clinical Neuroscience will be of primary interest to neurologists, neurosurgeons, psychiatrist and clinical specialized psycholigists, neuroradiologists and clinical neurophysiologists, but original works in basic or computer science, epidemiology, pharmacology, etc., relating to the clinical practice with involvement of the central nervous system are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书