Proton beam therapy versus trans-arterial chemoembolization for BCLC stage B hepatocellular carcinoma-a propensity-matched analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s00066-025-02495-9
Tzu-Ting Liu, Bing-Shen Huang, Yu-Ming Wang, Chieh-Min Liu, Eng-Yen Huang, Hsin-You Ou, Tsung-Hui Hu, Sheng-Nan Lu, Chao-Hung Hung, Yen-Hao Chen, Chung-Shih Chen, Jen-Yu Cheng
{"title":"Proton beam therapy versus trans-arterial chemoembolization for BCLC stage B hepatocellular carcinoma-a propensity-matched analysis.","authors":"Tzu-Ting Liu, Bing-Shen Huang, Yu-Ming Wang, Chieh-Min Liu, Eng-Yen Huang, Hsin-You Ou, Tsung-Hui Hu, Sheng-Nan Lu, Chao-Hung Hung, Yen-Hao Chen, Chung-Shih Chen, Jen-Yu Cheng","doi":"10.1007/s00066-025-02495-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Proton beam therapy (PBT) has a promising local control rate, but clinical data supporting its use for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains insufficient, and its survival benefit over transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has yet to be established. This study aimed to compare the two modalities by evaluating real-world survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort study used data from a multi-institutional medical research database. Treatment-naïve patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B HCC who underwent PBT or TACE as monotherapy were enrolled. Baseline patient and tumor characteristics were used for matching. Overall survival (OS) and post-treatment albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade were assessed, and stratified analyses were performed to evaluate the heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2007 and December 2022, 4349 patients with BCLC‑B HCC were identified, 1172 of whom met the inclusion criteria (PBT: 68; TACE: 1104). The PSM cohort matched 340 patients (PBT: 68; TACE: 272). Cox regression analysis revealed a significant survival benefit in the PBT group (p = 0.032, hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.97). Liver function was assessed in terms of ALBI grade every 3 months for 12 months after treatment, and the proportion of patients who maintained better liver function was greater in the PBT group than in the TACE group (p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with BCLC‑B HCC who are suitable candidates for PBT, PBT preserves better liver function than TACE and provides superior OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":21998,"journal":{"name":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","volume":" ","pages":"852-861"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-025-02495-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Proton beam therapy (PBT) has a promising local control rate, but clinical data supporting its use for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains insufficient, and its survival benefit over transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has yet to be established. This study aimed to compare the two modalities by evaluating real-world survival outcomes.

Methods: The propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort study used data from a multi-institutional medical research database. Treatment-naïve patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B HCC who underwent PBT or TACE as monotherapy were enrolled. Baseline patient and tumor characteristics were used for matching. Overall survival (OS) and post-treatment albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade were assessed, and stratified analyses were performed to evaluate the heterogeneity.

Results: Between January 2007 and December 2022, 4349 patients with BCLC‑B HCC were identified, 1172 of whom met the inclusion criteria (PBT: 68; TACE: 1104). The PSM cohort matched 340 patients (PBT: 68; TACE: 272). Cox regression analysis revealed a significant survival benefit in the PBT group (p = 0.032, hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.97). Liver function was assessed in terms of ALBI grade every 3 months for 12 months after treatment, and the proportion of patients who maintained better liver function was greater in the PBT group than in the TACE group (p = 0.006).

Conclusion: For patients with BCLC‑B HCC who are suitable candidates for PBT, PBT preserves better liver function than TACE and provides superior OS.

质子束治疗与经动脉化疗栓塞治疗BCLC B期肝细胞癌-倾向匹配分析
目的:质子束治疗(PBT)具有良好的局部控制率,但支持其用于中期肝细胞癌(HCC)的临床数据仍然不足,其比经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)的生存益处尚未确定。本研究旨在通过评估现实世界的生存结果来比较这两种模式。方法:倾向评分匹配(PSM)队列研究使用来自多机构医学研究数据库的数据。Treatment-naïve巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC) B期HCC患者接受PBT或TACE作为单药治疗。采用基线患者和肿瘤特征进行匹配。评估总生存期(OS)和治疗后白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分,并进行分层分析以评估异质性。结果:2007年1月至2022年12月,共发现4349例BCLC - B型HCC患者,其中1172例符合纳入标准(PBT: 68; TACE: 1104)。PSM队列匹配340例患者(PBT: 68例;TACE: 272例)。Cox回归分析显示PBT组有显著的生存获益(p = 0.032,风险比(HR) 0.64, 95% CI 0.42 ~ 0.97)。治疗后12个月,每3个月以ALBI分级评估肝功能,PBT组维持较好肝功能的患者比例大于TACE组(p = 0.006)。结论:对于适合PBT的BCLC - B HCC患者,PBT比TACE保留了更好的肝功能,提供了更好的OS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.90%
发文量
141
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, published monthly, is a scientific journal that covers all aspects of oncology with focus on radiooncology, radiation biology and radiation physics. The articles are not only of interest to radiooncologists but to all physicians interested in oncology, to radiation biologists and radiation physicists. The journal publishes original articles, review articles and case studies that are peer-reviewed. It includes scientific short communications as well as a literature review with annotated articles that inform the reader on new developments in the various disciplines concerned and hence allow for a sound overview on the latest results in radiooncology research. Founded in 1912, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the oldest oncological journal in the world. Today, contributions are published in English and German. All articles have English summaries and legends. The journal is the official publication of several scientific radiooncological societies and publishes the relevant communications of these societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书