Bion's "Mystic in the Group" Bowlby's Turmoil and Freud's Disavowal: Gifts That Come to the Trauma Field from Psychoanalysis if We Can Grasp Them.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1080/15299732.2025.2589167
Valerie Sinason
{"title":"Bion's \"Mystic in the Group\" Bowlby's Turmoil and Freud's Disavowal: Gifts That Come to the Trauma Field from Psychoanalysis if We Can Grasp Them.","authors":"Valerie Sinason","doi":"10.1080/15299732.2025.2589167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The author addresses how psychoanalysts sometimes create theories enabling the treatment of conditions which they themselves fail to acknowledge. When working with trauma clinicians are subject to disavowal, denial, detachment, and/or dissociation. Papers by Bion, Bowlby, and Freud are discussed for their clinical interest and how their theories prevented them from making use of their own ideas. Bion's outlining of the impact of hierarchy and conformity aids trauma work and its connection to whistleblowing although he didn't discuss child abuse. Bowlby regretted avoiding child abuse yet his work on attachment and loss benefits trauma workers. Freud's avoidance of externality such as socio-political embedded ideas on family and class prevented him from addressing the impact of reality on the structuring of mind. The author identifies examples from her own work illustrating where internalized theory aided her work with patients and where the impact of patients' trauma prevented her from using the tools at her disposal.</p>","PeriodicalId":47476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":" ","pages":"90-102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2025.2589167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author addresses how psychoanalysts sometimes create theories enabling the treatment of conditions which they themselves fail to acknowledge. When working with trauma clinicians are subject to disavowal, denial, detachment, and/or dissociation. Papers by Bion, Bowlby, and Freud are discussed for their clinical interest and how their theories prevented them from making use of their own ideas. Bion's outlining of the impact of hierarchy and conformity aids trauma work and its connection to whistleblowing although he didn't discuss child abuse. Bowlby regretted avoiding child abuse yet his work on attachment and loss benefits trauma workers. Freud's avoidance of externality such as socio-political embedded ideas on family and class prevented him from addressing the impact of reality on the structuring of mind. The author identifies examples from her own work illustrating where internalized theory aided her work with patients and where the impact of patients' trauma prevented her from using the tools at her disposal.

鲍比的混乱和弗洛伊德的否定:如果我们能抓住精神分析对创伤领域的馈赠。
作者阐述了精神分析学家有时是如何创造理论来治疗他们自己都不承认的病症的。当处理创伤时,临床医生往往会拒绝、否认、脱离和/或分离。本文讨论了比昂、鲍比和弗洛伊德的论文,因为他们的临床兴趣以及他们的理论如何阻碍了他们利用自己的想法。Bion概述了等级制度和从众的影响,这有助于创伤研究及其与举报的联系,尽管他没有讨论虐待儿童的问题。鲍尔比后悔没有虐待儿童,但他在依恋和失去方面的工作使创伤工作者受益。弗洛伊德对外部性的回避,比如对家庭和阶级的社会政治嵌入思想,使他无法解决现实对心灵结构的影响。作者从她自己的工作中找出例子,说明内化理论如何帮助她与患者一起工作,以及患者创伤的影响如何阻止她使用她所掌握的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书