Atopy, asthma symptoms and eosinophilic airway inflammation in British woodworkers.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ruth Eleanor Wiggans, Jade Sumner, Edward W Robinson, Charlotte Young, Andrew Simpson, Timothy Yates, David Fishwick, Christopher M Barber
{"title":"Atopy, asthma symptoms and eosinophilic airway inflammation in British woodworkers.","authors":"Ruth Eleanor Wiggans, Jade Sumner, Edward W Robinson, Charlotte Young, Andrew Simpson, Timothy Yates, David Fishwick, Christopher M Barber","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite reducing exposures to wood dust, woodworkers remain at increased risk of asthma. There have been no recent studies of wood dust exposure, respiratory symptoms or asthma in British woodworkers. This cross-sectional study examined factors associated with asthma in British woodworkers across exposure groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants answered a reporter-delivered work and respiratory questionnaire, and underwent fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE<sub>NO</sub>), spirometry and specific IgE measurements. Wood dust exposure was assigned through a job-exposure matrix. Multiple regression evaluated associations between asthma and factors including exposure, atopy and current asthma symptoms (CAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 269 woodworkers participated. Median wood dust exposure was 2.00 mg/m<sup>3</sup> (IQR 1.14 mg/m<sup>3</sup>). CAS, work-related respiratory symptoms (WRRS) and eosinophilic airway inflammation (FE<sub>NO</sub>>40 ppb) were common, present in 46%, 11% and 19% of the cohort, respectively. Atopic woodworkers were more likely to have nasal symptoms (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.85, p<0.05), WRRS (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.11 to 6.92, p<0.05), asthma (OR 3.40, 95% CI 1.49 to 7.81, p<0.01) and FE<sub>NO</sub>>40 ppb (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.88, p<0.05). No effect was seen for airflow obstruction. Symptomatic workers were more likely to have WRRS and asthma (OR 4.29, 95% CI 2.12 to 8.69, p<0.001) but not FE<sub>NO</sub>>40 ppb or airflow obstruction. A dose-response effect with wood dust exposure was not seen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Asthma symptoms were prevalent among British woodworkers, even at low exposure levels. Atopy was associated with asthma, particularly among symptomatic woodworkers. Further studies should phenotype woodworkers at risk of asthma and inform approaches to reduce risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"527-533"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12911571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-110183","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Despite reducing exposures to wood dust, woodworkers remain at increased risk of asthma. There have been no recent studies of wood dust exposure, respiratory symptoms or asthma in British woodworkers. This cross-sectional study examined factors associated with asthma in British woodworkers across exposure groups.

Methods: Participants answered a reporter-delivered work and respiratory questionnaire, and underwent fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), spirometry and specific IgE measurements. Wood dust exposure was assigned through a job-exposure matrix. Multiple regression evaluated associations between asthma and factors including exposure, atopy and current asthma symptoms (CAS).

Results: A total of 269 woodworkers participated. Median wood dust exposure was 2.00 mg/m3 (IQR 1.14 mg/m3). CAS, work-related respiratory symptoms (WRRS) and eosinophilic airway inflammation (FENO>40 ppb) were common, present in 46%, 11% and 19% of the cohort, respectively. Atopic woodworkers were more likely to have nasal symptoms (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.85, p<0.05), WRRS (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.11 to 6.92, p<0.05), asthma (OR 3.40, 95% CI 1.49 to 7.81, p<0.01) and FENO>40 ppb (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.88, p<0.05). No effect was seen for airflow obstruction. Symptomatic workers were more likely to have WRRS and asthma (OR 4.29, 95% CI 2.12 to 8.69, p<0.001) but not FENO>40 ppb or airflow obstruction. A dose-response effect with wood dust exposure was not seen.

Conclusions: Asthma symptoms were prevalent among British woodworkers, even at low exposure levels. Atopy was associated with asthma, particularly among symptomatic woodworkers. Further studies should phenotype woodworkers at risk of asthma and inform approaches to reduce risk.

英国木工的特应性、哮喘症状和嗜酸性气道炎症。
目的:尽管木材粉尘暴露减少,但木工哮喘的风险仍在增加。最近没有关于英国木工接触木屑、呼吸道症状或哮喘的研究。这项横断面研究检查了不同暴露组中英国木工哮喘的相关因素。方法:参与者回答了一份由记者提供的工作和呼吸问卷,并接受了分数呼出一氧化氮(FENO)、肺活量测定和特异性IgE测量。通过工作暴露矩阵分配木尘暴露。多元回归评估了哮喘与暴露、特应性和当前哮喘症状(CAS)等因素之间的关系。结果:共有269名木工参与。木屑暴露中位数为2.00 mg/m3 (IQR为1.14 mg/m3)。CAS、工作相关呼吸道症状(WRRS)和嗜酸性气道炎症(FENO bbb40 ppb)很常见,分别出现在46%、11%和19%的队列中。特应性木工更有可能出现鼻腔症状(OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.18至3.85,pNO>40 ppb (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.03至3.88,pNO>40 ppb)或气流阻塞。未见木屑暴露的剂量反应效应。结论:哮喘症状在英国木工中普遍存在,即使在低暴露水平。特应性与哮喘有关,特别是在有症状的木工中。进一步的研究应该对木工哮喘风险进行表型分析,并告知降低风险的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书