{"title":"Newborn Screening: Current State, Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions.","authors":"Meriam J Avades, Artemiy Kokhanov","doi":"10.1542/neo.26-12-083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the early 1960s, the newborn screening (NBS) program in the United States began with testing for phenylketonuria. Since that time, the NBS program has greatly expanded the number of disorders tested in all newborns. This article reviews the importance of NBS from a public health perspective as well as in the clinical setting to detect, diagnose, and manage conditions early. Current practices vary across the United States as well as internationally. While there have been several advancements in NBS over the past several decades, multiple challenges and limitations remain. Some of these challenges include false-positive and false-negative results, the ethical dilemma of consent, and optimal timing of NBS in the neonatal intensive care unit. Future directions of NBS, both nationally and internationally, include the implementation of next-generation sequencing testing and artificial intelligence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19465,"journal":{"name":"NeoReviews","volume":"26 12","pages":"e809-e819"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeoReviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.26-12-083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the early 1960s, the newborn screening (NBS) program in the United States began with testing for phenylketonuria. Since that time, the NBS program has greatly expanded the number of disorders tested in all newborns. This article reviews the importance of NBS from a public health perspective as well as in the clinical setting to detect, diagnose, and manage conditions early. Current practices vary across the United States as well as internationally. While there have been several advancements in NBS over the past several decades, multiple challenges and limitations remain. Some of these challenges include false-positive and false-negative results, the ethical dilemma of consent, and optimal timing of NBS in the neonatal intensive care unit. Future directions of NBS, both nationally and internationally, include the implementation of next-generation sequencing testing and artificial intelligence.
NeoReviewsMedicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
期刊介绍:
Co-edited by Alistair G.S. Philip, MD, FAAP, and William W. Hay Jr., MD, FAAP, NeoReviews each month delivers 3 to 4 clinical reviews, case discussions, basic science insights and "on the horizon" pieces. Written and edited by experts, these concise reviews are available to NeoReviews subscribers at http://neoreviews.aappublications.org. Since January 2009, all clinical articles have been mapped to the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) content specifications in neonatology.