Niamh Fee, Louise E Glover, Renato Bauman, David A Crosby
{"title":"Patient perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in fertility treatment.","authors":"Niamh Fee, Louise E Glover, Renato Bauman, David A Crosby","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2025.2591161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective was to evaluate patient knowledge, attitudes and perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technology within a fertility clinic. Patients were undergoing treatment between June 2024 and December 2024. The Main Outcome Measure(s) were Likert Comfort levels scale and Qualitative analysis of responses. Overall, 206 responses were received. While 41% believed that AI could improve outcomes, most (56%) indicated that they 'did not know'. Overall, respondents were comfortable with AI being used in administrative tasks (69%), assisting with clinical decisions (67%) and assisting an embryologist (74%). However, respondents were not comfortable with AI alone performing embryo selection (93.1%), conducting semen analysis (89.2%), sperm selection in ICSI (90.2%) or reporting an ultrasound scan (84.5%). Men were more likely to be comfortable with AI alone determining which embryo to transfer (<i>p</i> = 0.0037), conducting semen analysis (<i>p</i> = 0.01), and sperm selection for ICSI (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Dominant themes regarding the benefits of AI included its use as an assistant, improving efficiency, and reducing error, while dominant themes of patient concerns included human replacement, loss of empathy, and the need for monitoring. Patients have concerns regarding the introduction of AI into fertility care, with men more likely than women to be comfortable.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":"28 1","pages":"2591161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2025.2591161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective was to evaluate patient knowledge, attitudes and perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technology within a fertility clinic. Patients were undergoing treatment between June 2024 and December 2024. The Main Outcome Measure(s) were Likert Comfort levels scale and Qualitative analysis of responses. Overall, 206 responses were received. While 41% believed that AI could improve outcomes, most (56%) indicated that they 'did not know'. Overall, respondents were comfortable with AI being used in administrative tasks (69%), assisting with clinical decisions (67%) and assisting an embryologist (74%). However, respondents were not comfortable with AI alone performing embryo selection (93.1%), conducting semen analysis (89.2%), sperm selection in ICSI (90.2%) or reporting an ultrasound scan (84.5%). Men were more likely to be comfortable with AI alone determining which embryo to transfer (p = 0.0037), conducting semen analysis (p = 0.01), and sperm selection for ICSI (p = 0.02). Dominant themes regarding the benefits of AI included its use as an assistant, improving efficiency, and reducing error, while dominant themes of patient concerns included human replacement, loss of empathy, and the need for monitoring. Patients have concerns regarding the introduction of AI into fertility care, with men more likely than women to be comfortable.
期刊介绍:
Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society.
The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group.
All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.